False-negative ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of the breast: Difference with US-detected and MRI-detected lesions

Breast Cancer

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 110-117

  Sakamoto, Naomi ^a,b   Tozaki, Mitsuhiro ^a   Higa, Kuniki ^a   Abe, Satoko ^a   Ozaki, Shinji ^a   Fukuma, Eisuke ^a  

^a Breast Center   (Japan)

^b NARA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; False negative rate; MRI detected lesions; Ultrasound guided vacuum assisted biopsy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; BREAST SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ULTRASOUND GUIDED VACUUM ASSISTED BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER INVASION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LUNG CARCINOMA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; VACUUM;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY; VACUUM; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954729567     PISSN: 13406868     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-009-0112-1     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, Stavros AT, Johnson KK, Yakes WF. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology. 1993;187:507-11.
2. Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF. Ultrasound-guided core breast biopsy: utility and cost-effectiveness. Radiology. 1998;208:717-23.
3. Simon JR, Kalbhen CL, Cooper RA, Flisak ME. Accuracy and complication rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: initial results. Radiology. 2000;215:694-7.
4. Liberman L. Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40:483-500.
5. Harvey JA, Moran RE, DeAngelis GA. Technique and pitfalls of ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy of the breast. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2000;21:337-403.
6. Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ. Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the Mammotome. Am Surg. 1996;62:738-44.
7. Berg WA, Krebs TL, Campassi C, Magder LS, Sun CC. Evaluation of 14- and 11-gauge directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy probes and 14-gauge biopsy guns in a breast parenchymal model. Radiology. 1997;205:203-8.
8. Parker SH, Klaus AJ, McWey PJ, Schilling KJ, Cupples TE, Duchesne N, et al. Sonographically guided directional vacuumassisted breast biopsy using a handheld device. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:405-8.
9. Philpotts LE, Hooley RJ, Lee CH. Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:347-51.
10. Perez-Fuentes JA, Longobardi IR, Acosta VF, Marin CE, Liberman L. Sonographically guided directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: preliminary experience in Venezuela. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:1459-63.
11. Cassano E, Urban LA, Pizzamiglio M, Abbate F, Maisonneuve P, Renne G, et al. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: experience with 406 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;102:103-10.
12. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 4th ed. Reston, Virginia: American College of Radiology; 2003.
13. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881-8.
14. Morakkabati-Spitz N, Leutner C, Schild H, Traeber F, Kuhl C. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:2010-7.
15. Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K. Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:313-21.
16. Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Higa K, Tsunoda Y, Ogawa T, Abe S, et al. Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI. Breast Cancer. 2008;15:241-6.
17. Kuhl CK, Morakkabati N, Leutner CC, Schmiedel A, Wardelmann E, Schild HH. MR imaging-guided large-core (14-gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone. Radiology. 2001;220:31-9.
18. Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Sittek H, Casselman J, Anderson I, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuumassisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer. 2006;106:982-90.
19. Tozaki M, Yamashiro N, Suzuki T, Kawano N, Ozaki S, Sakamoto N, Abe S, Ogawa T, Katayama N, Tsunoda Y, Fukuma E. MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: is it an essential technique? Breast Cancer. 2008 Sep 20.
20. Gobbi H, Simpson JF, Borowsky A, Jensen RA, Page DL. Metaplastic breast tumors with a dominant fibromatosis-like phenotype have a high risk of local recurrence. Cancer. 1999;85:2170-82.
21. Sneige N, Yaziji H, Mandavilli SR, Perez ER, Ordonez NG, Gown AM, et al. Low-grade (fibromatosis-like) spindle cell carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:1009-16.
22. Ivan D, Selinko V, Sahin AA, Sneige N, Middleton LP. Accuracy of core needle biopsy diagnosis in assessing papillary breast lesions: histologic predictors of malignancy. Mod Pathol. 2004;17:165-71. (Pubitemid 41656512)
23. Rosen EL, Bentley RC, Baker JA. Imaging-guided core needle biopsy of papillary lesions of the breast. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1185-92.
24. Sydnor MK, Wilson JD, Hijaz TA, Massey HD, Shaw de Paredes ES. Underestimation of the presence of breast carcinoma in papillary lesions initially diagnosed at core-needle biopsy. Radiology. 2007;242:58-62.
25. Renshaw AA, Derhagopian RP, Tizol-Blanco DM, Gould EW. Papillomas and atypical papillomas in breast core needle biopsy specimens: risk of carcinoma in subsequent excision. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;122:217-21.
26. Liberman L, Tornos C, Huzjan R, Bartella L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. Is surgical excision warranted after benign, concordant diagnosis of papilloma at percutaneous breast biopsy? Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1328-34.
27. Mercado CL, Hamele-Bena D, Oken SM, Singer CI, Cangiarella J. Papillary lesions of the breast at percutaneous core-needle biopsy. Radiology. 2006;238:801-8.
28. Jacobs TW, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ. Nonmalignant lesions in breast core needle biopsies: to excise or not to excise? Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26:1095-110.
29. Fenoglio C, Lattes R. Sclerosing papillary proliferations in the female breast: a benign lesion often mistaken for carcinoma. Cancer. 1974;33:691-700.
30. Carter D. Intraductal papillary tumors of the breast: a study of 78 cases. Cancer. 1977;39:1689-92.
31. Tavassoli FA. Papillary lesions. In: Tavassoli FA, editor. Pathology of the breast. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange; 1992. p. 193-227.
32. Shin HJ, Kim HH, Kim SM, Yang HR, Sohn JH, Kwon GY, et al. Papillary lesions of the breast diagnosed at percutaneous sonographically guided biopsy: comparison of sonographic features and biopsy methods. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:630-6.
33. Shah VI, Raju U, Chitale D, Deshpande V, Gregory N, Strand V. False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast: an analysis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 consecutive cases of missed breast cancer. Cancer. 2003;97:1824-31.