A comparative study between the preoperative diagnostic tumor size and the postoperative pathologic tumor size in patients with breast tumors

Journal of Breast Cancer

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 187-197

  Hwang, Ki Tae ^a   Kim, Hyeyoung ^a   Chung, Jung Kee ^a   Jung, In Mok ^a   Heo, Seung Chul ^a   Ahn, Young Joon ^a   Ahn, Hye Seong ^a   Cha, Joo Hee ^a   Chung, Se Yeong ^a   Chang, Mee Soo ^a   Noh, Dong Young ^b  

^a Seoul National University Boramae Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Comparative study; Tumor burden

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 77954721988     PISSN: 17386756     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2010.13.2.187     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Greene T, Cocilovo C, Estabrook A, Chinitz L, Giuliano C, Rosenbaum Smith S, et al. A single institution review of new breast malignancies identified solely by sonography. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203: 894-8.
2. Buchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P, Obrist P, Dünser M. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:921-7.
3. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. A retrospective review. Cancer 1995;76:626-30.
4. Tohno E, Ueno E, Watanabe H. Ultrasound screening of breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2009;16:18-22.
5. Uchida K, Yamashita A, Kawase K, Kamiya K. Screening ultrasonography revealed 15% of mammographically occult breast cancers. Breast Cancer 2008;15:165-8.
6. Honjo S, Ando J, Tsukioka T, Morikubo H, Ichimura M, Sunagawa M, et al. Relative and combined performance of mammography and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in the general population: a pilot study in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2007;37: 715-20.
7. Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, Uchida Y. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, multidetector row computed tomography, ultra-sonography, and mammography for tumor extension of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008;112:461-74.
8. Price J, Chen SW. Screening for breast cancer with MRI: recent experience from the Australian Capital Territory. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2009;53:69-80.
9. Almubarak M, Osman S, Marano G, Abraham J. Role of positron-emission tomography scan in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 2009;23:255-61.
10. Lee CS, Bong JG, Park JH, Lee YS, Paik SM, Shin MJ, et al. The accuracy of the physical examination, mammography, and ultraso-nography in the assessment of tumor size and axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patient. J Korean Breast Cancer Soc 2003; 6:87-94.
11. Herrada J, Iyer RB, Atkinson EN, Sneige N, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN. Relative value of physical examination, mammography, and breast sonography in evaluating the size of the primary tumor and regional lymph node metastases in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 1997;3:1565-9.
12. Fornage BD, Toubas O, Morel M. Clinical, mammographic, and sonographic determination of preoperative breast cancer size. Cancer 1987;60:765-71.
13. Bosch AM, Kessels AG, Beets GL, Rupa JD, Koster D, van Engel-shoven JM, et al. Preoperative estimation of the pathological breast tumour size by physical examination, mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study on 105 invasive tumours. Eur J Radiol 2003;48: 285-92.
14. Forouhi P, Walsh JS, Anderson TJ, Chetty U. Ultrasonography as a method of measuring breast tumour size and monitoring response to primary systemic treatment. Br J Surg 1994;81:223-5.
15. Jiang YX, Liu H, Liu JB, Zhu QL, Sun Q, Chang XY. Breast tumor size assessment: comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007;33:1873-81.
16. Cheung YC, Wan YL, Lo YF, Leung WM, Chen SC, Hsueh S. Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation for breast cancers after sonographically guided core-needle biopsy: a comparison study. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:756-61.
17. Weatherall PT, Evans GF, Metzger GJ, Saborrian MH, Leitch AM. MRI vs. histologic measurement of breast cancer following chemotherapy: comparison with x-ray mammography and palpation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:868-75.
18. Davis PL, Staiger MJ, Harris KB, Ganott MA, Klementaviciene J, McCarty KS Jr, et al. Breast cancer measurements with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1996;37:1-9.
19. Choi GH, Bae JW, Lee JB, Koo BH. Clinical, mammographic, and ultrasonographic assessment of breast cancer size. J Korean Surg Soc 2003;58:331-6.
20. Meden H, Neues KP, Röben-Kämpken S, Kuhn W. A clinical, mammographic, sonographic and histologic evaluation of breast cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995;48:193-9.
21. Pain JA, Ebbs SR, Hern RP, Lowe S, Bradbeer JW. Assessment of breast cancer size: a comparison of methods. Eur J Surg Oncol 1992; 18:44-8.
22. Devolli-Disha E, Manxhuka-Kërliu S, Ymeri H, Kutllovci A. Comparative accuracy of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast symptoms according to age and breast density. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2009;9:131-6.
23. Fasching PA, Heusinger K, Loehberg CR, Wenkel E, Lux MP, Sch-rauder M, et al. Influence of mammographic density on the diagnostic accuracy of tumor size assessment and association with breast cancer tumor characteristics. Eur J Radiol 2006;60:398-404.
24. Saarenmaa I, Salminen T, Geiger U, Heikkinen P, Hyvärinen S, Isola J, et al. The effect of age and density of the breast on the sensitivity of breast cancer diagnostic by mammography and ultrasonography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001;67:117-23.
25. Watermann DO, Tempfer C, Hefler LA, Parat C, Stickeler E. Ultrasound morphology of invasive lobular breast cancer is different compared with other types of breast cancer. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31:167-74.
26. Evans N, Lyons K. The use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast less than 10 mm in size. Clin Radiol 2000;55:261-3.
27. Kim DY, Moon WK, Cho N, Ko ES, Yang SK, Park JS, et al. MRI of the breast for the detection and assessment of the size of ductal carcinoma in situ. Korean J Radiol 2007;8:32-9.