Screening for breast cancer with MRI: Recent experience from the Australian Capital Territory

Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 69-80

  Price, J ^a,b   Chen, Sw ^a  

^a National Capital Diagnostic Imaging   (Australia)

^b NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast MRI; High risk; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SCREENING; CARCINOMA IN SITU; ECHOGRAPHY; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR BIOPSY;

ADULT; AGED; AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 65349144894     PISSN: 17549477     EISSN: 17549485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02040.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Morris EA, Liberman L, Ballon DJ et al. MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population. AJR 2003 181 : 619 26. (Pubitemid 37021827)
2. Kriege M, Brekelmans CTM, Boetes C et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 2004 351 : 427 37. (Pubitemid 38988592)
3. Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004 292 : 1317 25. (Pubitemid 39223222)
4. Leach MO, Boggis CRM, Dixon AK et al. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 2005 365 : 1769 78. (Pubitemid 40744657)
5. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005 23 : 8469 76. (Pubitemid 46260243)
6. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W et al. American Cancer Society Guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007 57 : 75 89. (Pubitemid 46535708)
7. National Breast Cancer Centre. Advice about Familial Aspects of Breast Cancer and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. NBCC, Camperdown, NSW, 2006.
8. ®). ACR, Reston, VA, 2003.
9. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Wardelmann E, Braun M, Kuhn W, Schild HH. Magnetic resonance imaging versus mammography for diagnosing ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 2007 25 : 1504.
10. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 2007 370 : 485 92. (Pubitemid 47214635)
11. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Thornton CM, Van Zee KJ, Tan LK. Fast MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experience. AJR 2003 181 : 1283 93. (Pubitemid 37296404)
12. Lehman CD, DePeri ER, Peacock S, McDonough MD, DeMartini WB, Shook J. Clinical experience with MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR 2005 184 : 1782 7. (Pubitemid 40770148)
13. Liberman L, Bracero N, Morris E, Thornton C, Dershaw DD. MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial clinical experience. AJR 2005 185 : 183 93.
14. Mendel JB, Long M, Slanetz PJ. CT-guided core needle biopsy of breast lesions visible only on MRI. AJR 2007 189 : 152 4. (Pubitemid 46983204)
15. Boyd NF, Dite GS, Stone J et al. Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002 347 : 886 94.
16. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ et al. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007 356 : 227 36.
17. Arpino G, Laucirica R, Elledge RM. Premalignant and in situ breast disease: biology and clinical implications. Ann Intern Med 2005 143 : 446 57. (Pubitemid 41338942)
18. Page DL, Schuyler PA, Dupont WD et al. Atypical lobular hyperplasia as a unilateral predictor of breast cancer risk: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2003 361 : 125 9. (Pubitemid 36092016)
19. Elsheikh TM, Silverman JF. Follow-up surgical excision is indicated when breast core needle biopsies show atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ. Am J Surg Pathol 2005 29 : 534 43. (Pubitemid 43754496)
20. Boetes C, Veltman J, van Die L, Bult P, Wobbes T, Barentsz JO. The role of MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004 86 : 31 7. (Pubitemid 38918896)
21. Port ER, Park A, Borgen PI, Morris E, Montgomery LL. Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia. Ann Surg Oncol 2007 14 : 1051 7.
22. Peters G, Anderson J, Longman G et al. Magnetic resonance findings in women at high risk for developing breast cancer: an Australian feasibility study. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2008 52 : 29 35.
23. Malich A, Fischer DR, Wurdinger S et al. Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses. AJR 2005 185 : 964 70.