A Single Institution Review of New Breast Malignancies Identified Solely by Sonography

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 203, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 894-898

  Greene, Tobi ^a   Cocilovo, Costanza ^a   Estabrook, Alison ^a   Chinitz, Lynn ^a   Giuliano, Christina ^a   Rosenbaum Smith, Sharon ^a   Tartter, Paul I ^a  

^a ST LUKE S ROOSEVELT HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; TUMOR BIOPSY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 33751018586     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.017     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Gordon P.B., Goldenberg S.L., and Chan N.H. Solid breast lesions: diagnosis with US-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology 189 (1993) 573-580
2. Wild J.J., and Neal D. The use of high frequency ultrasonic waves for detecting changes of texture in the living tissue. Lancet 1 (1951) 655
3. Cole-Bueglet C., Goldberg B., Kurtz A., et al. Ultrasound mammography: a comparison with radiographic mammography. Radiology 139 (1981) 693-698
4. Cole-Beuglet C., Soriano R.Z., Kurtz A.B., and Goldberg B.B. Ultrasound analysis of 104 primary breast carcinomas classified according to histopathologic type. Radiology 147 (1983) 191-196
5. Kopans D.B. Breast sonographic screening is not ready for prime time. AJR 181 (2003) 1426-1428
6. Farria D., and Feig S.A. An introduction to economic issued in breast imaging. Radiol Clin North Amer 38 (2000) 825-842
7. American College of Radiology. Standard for the performance of breast ultrasound examination (1994)
8. Kolb T.M., Lichy J., and Newhouse J.H. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts; Detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 207 (1998) 191-199
9. Kolb T.M., Lichy J., and Newhouse J.H. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them; An analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225 (2002) 165-175
10. Crystal P., Strano S.D., Shcharynski S., et al. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR 181 (2003) 177-182
11. Buchberger W., DeKoekkoek-Doll P., Springer P., et al. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic work up. AJR 173 (1999) 921-927
12. Leconte I., Feger C., Galant C., et al. Mammography and subsequent whole sonography of non-palpable breast cancers: The importance of radiologic breast density. AJR 180 (2003) 1675-1679
13. Kaplan S. Clinical utility of bilateral whole breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 221 (2001) 641-649
14. Gordon P.B., and Goldenberg S.L. Malignant breast masses detected only by US. A retrospective review. Cancer 76 (1995) 626-630
15. Berg W.A. Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN 6666). AJR 180 (2003) 1225-1226
16. Stavros A.T. Breast ultrasound (2004), Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia