The new learners-millennials!!

International Anesthesiology Clinics

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 13-25

  Kurup, Viji ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRTH; EDUCATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; LEARNING STYLE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; MEDICINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; RECREATION; RESEARCH; REVIEW; SEARCH ENGINE; AGE; ANESTHESIOLOGY; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMAN; LEARNING; PROCEDURES; TEACHING;

AGE FACTORS; ANESTHESIOLOGY; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; LEARNING; TEACHING;

EID: 77954701112     PISSN: 00205907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e3181e5c1b4     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Jonas S. The case for change in medical education in the United States. Lancet. 1984;2:452-454.
2. Swanson AG, Anderson MB. Educating medical students. Assessing change in medical education-the road to implementation. Acad Med. 1993;68:S1-S46.
3. Johnson SA, Romanello ML. Generational diversity: teaching and learning approaches. Nurse Educ. 2005;30:212-216.
4. Howe N, Strauss W. Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. New York: Vintage Books; 2000.
5. Jones S, Fox, S. Generations Online in 2009 Pew Internet and American Life Project. Jan 28, 2009, http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/Generations- Online-in-2009.asp, accessed on May 24, 2010.
6. Pew Research Center. Millennials: Confident. Connected. Open to Change, Feb 24, 2010, http://pewsocialtrends.org/pubs/751/millennials-confident- connected-open-tochange, accessed May 24, 2010.
7. Rideout Victoria JFUG, Roberts Donald H. Generation M2-Media in the lives of 8-18 year olds Kaiser Family Foundation report, 2010.
8. Kurup V, Ruskin K. Information Technology in Anesthesia education. In: Stonemetz J, Ruskin K, eds. Anesthesia Informatics. 1st ed. London: Springer-Verlag; 2008:397-408.
9. Hodges AR, Meiman M. IM is for Instant Millennials: developing staffing models and best practices for instant messaging. Tech Serv Quart. 2009;26:199-206.
10. Madden M, Jones S. The Internet Goes to College. Washington: Pew Internet and American Life Project; Sept 15, 2002:2-21, http://www.pewinternet.org/ Reports/ 2002/The-Internet-Goes-to-College.aspx, accessed May 24, 2010.
11. Skiba Diane J, Barton Amy J. Adapting your teaching to accomodate the net generation of learners. Online J Issue Nursing 2006;11:15.
12. Brown J. Growing up digital: how the web changes work, education and the ways people learn. Change. 2000;32:10-20.
13. Alwin DF. Family of Origin and cohort differences in verbal ability. Am Sociol Rev. 1991;56:625-638.
14. Wilson JA, Gove WR. The intercohort decline in verbal ability: does it exist? Am Sociol Rev. 1999;64:253-266.
15. Flynn JR. Massive IQ gains in 14 Nations: what IQ tests really measure. Review. Psychol Bull. 1987;101:171-191.
16. Glenn ND. Television watching, newspaper reading, and cohort differences in verbal ability. Sociol Educ. 1994;67:216-230.
17. Noel Levitz. National Freshman Attitudes Report. 2009:1-16.
18. Wilson ME. Teaching, learning, and Millennial students. New Directions Student Services. 2004;106:59-71.
19. Greenfield PM. Technology and informal education: what is taught, what is learned. Science. 2009;323:69-71.
20. Lenhart A. Teens, Video Games and Civics. Washington: Pew Internet and American life Project; 2008.
21. Rosser JC Jr, Lynch PJ, Cuddihy L, et al. The impact of video games on training surgeons in the 21st century. Arch Surg. 2007;142:181-186.
22. Anand V. A study of time management: the correlation between video game usage and academic performance markers. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007;10: 552-559.
23. Gentile DA, Lynch PJ, Linder JR, et al. The effects of violent video game habits on adolescent hostility, aggressive behaviors, and school performance. J Adolesc. 2004; 27:5-22.
24. Skoric M, Linda Lay CT, Lijie Neo R. Children and video games: addiction, engagement, and scholastic achievement. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009;12:567-572.
25. Green SC, Bavelier D. Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature. 2003;423:534-537.
26. Pardue KT, Morgan P. Millennials considered: a new generation, new approaches, and implications for nursing education. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2008;29:74-79.
27. Chu LF, Young C, Zamora A, et al. Anesthesia 2.0: Internet-based information resources and Web 2.0 applications in anesthesia education. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010; 23:218-227.
28. Armstrong GB, Chung L. Background television and reading memory in context: assessing TV interference and facilitative context effects on encoding versus retrieval processes. Communication Res. 2000;27:327-352.
29. Steven Appelbaum AM, Fernandez A. The multi-tasking paradox: perceptions, problems and strategies. Manage Decision. 2008;46:1313-1325.
30. Hembrooke H, Gay G. The laptop and the lecture: the effects of multitasking in learning environments. J Comput Higher Educ. 2003;15:46-64.
31. Ophir E, Nass C, Wagner AD. Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106:15583-15587.
32. Eitel F, Kanz K, Hortig E, et al. Do we face a fourth paradigm shift in medicinealgorithms in education? J Eval Clin Pract. 2000;6:321-333.
33. Davis D, O'Brien MA, Freemantle N, et al. Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA. 1999; 282:867-874.
34. Oblinger DG, Hawkins B. The myth about students. Educause. 2005; Educause Review, 40 (5), Sept/Oct 2005.:12-13; http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+ Review/EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume40/TheMythaboutStudents/158010, accessed May 24, 2010.
35. Marc P. "Engage me or enrage me." What today's learners demand. Educause Review 40 (5), Sept/Oct. 2005; http://www.educause.edu/ EDUCAUSE+Review/EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume40/ EngageMeorEnrageMeWhatTodaysLe/ 158006, accessed May 24, 2010.