Distinguishing trust from confidence: Manageable difficulties, worth the effort reply to: Trust and confidence: The difficulties in distinguishing the two concepts in research

Risk Analysis

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1025-1027

  Earle, Timothy C ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954690801     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01456.x     Document Type: Note

References (21)

1. Earle TC. Trust in risk management: A model-based review of empirical research. Risk Analysis, 2010 30 : 541 574.
2. Siegrist M. Trust and confidence: The difficulties in distinguishing the two concepts in research. Risk Analysis, 2010 30
3. Huune E ter, Gutteling J. Information needs and risk perception as predictors of risk information seeking. Journal of Risk Research, 2008 11 : 847 862.
4. Moon W, Balasubramanian SK. Public attitudes toward agrobiotechnology: The mediating role of risk perceptions on the impact of trust, awareness, and outrage. Review of Agricultural Economics, 2004 26 : 186 208.
5. McAllister DJ. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 1995 38 : 24 59.
6. Delgado-Ballester E, Munuera-Alemán JL, Yagüe-Guillén MJ. Development and validation of a brand trust scale. International Journal of Market Research, 2003 45 : 35 53.
7. Johnson D, Grayson K. Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. Journal of Business Research, 2005 58 : 500 507.
8. Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P. Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2007 11 : 77 83.
9. Earle TC. Trust, confidence, and the 2008 global financial crisis. Risk Analysis, 2009 785 792.
10. Earle TC, Siegrist M. Trust, confidence and cooperation model: A framework for understanding the relation between trust and risk perception. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 2008 8 : 17 29.
11. Bronfman NC, Vázquez EL, Dorantes G. An empirical study for the direct and indirect links between trust in regulatory institutions and acceptability of hazards. Safety Science, 2009 47 : 686 692.
12. Bronfman NC, Vázquez EL, Gutiérrez VV, Cifuentes LA. Trust, acceptance and knowledge of technological and environmental hazards in Chile. Journal of Risk Research, 2008 11 : 755 773.
13. Montjin-Dorgelo FNH, Midden CJH. The role of negative associations and trust in risk perception of new hydrogen systems. Journal of Risk Research, 2008 11 : 659 671.
14. Earle TC, Cvetkovich G. Social Trust: Toward A Cosmopolitan Society.
15. Earle TC, Siegrist M, Gutscher H. Trust, risk perception, and the TCC model of cooperation. Chapter 1 in Siegrist M, Earle TC, Gutscher H (eds). Trust in Cooperative Risk Management.
16. Chou L-F, Wang A-C, Wang T-Y, Huang M-P, Cheng B-S. Shared work values and team member effectiveness: The mediation of trustfulness and trustworthiness. Human Relations, 2009 61 : 1713 1742.
17. Cazier JA, Shao BBM, St Louis RD. Sharing information and building trust through value congruence. Information Systems Frontiers, 2007 9 : 515 529.
18. Pirson M, Malhotra D. What Matters to Whom? Managing Trust Across Multiple Stakeholder Groups.
19. Pirson M, Malhotra D. Unconventional insights for managing stakeholder trust. Sloan Management Review, 2008 49 : 43 50.
20. Vaske JJ, Absher JD, Bright AD. Salient value similarity, social trust and attitudes toward wildland fire management strategies. Human Ecology Review, 2007 14 : 223 232.
21. Meijnders A, Midden C, Olofsson A, Öhman S, Matthes J, Bondarenko O, Gutteling J, Rusanen M. The role of similarity cues in the development of trust in sources of information about GM food. Risk Analysis, 2009 29 : 1116 1128.