Repeated reading of syllables among finnish-speaking children with poor reading skills

Scientific Studies of Reading

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 317-340

  Huemer, Sini ^a   Aro, Mikko ^b   Landerl, Karin ^c   Lyytinen, Heikki ^b  

^a Niilo Maki Instituutti   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954649516     PISSN: 10888438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10888430903150659     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ahonen, T., Tuovinen, S., & Leppäsaari, T. (2003). Nopean sarjallisen nimeämisen testi [Test of Rapid Serial Naming]. Jyväskylä, Finland: Niilo Mäki Institute.
2. Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., & Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review, 105, 678-723.
3. Aro, M. (2006). Learning to read: The effect of orthography. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 531-550). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Barber, H., & Kutas, M. (2007). Interplay between computational models and cognitive electrophysiology in visual word recognition. Brain Research Reviews, 53, 98-123.
5. Berends, I., & Reitsma, P. (2006a). Addressing semantics promotes the development of reading fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 247-265.
6. Berends, I., & Reitsma, P. (2006b). Remediation of fluency: Word specific or generalised training effects? Reading and Writing, 19, 221-234.
7. Cole, P., Magnan, A., & Grainger, J. (1999). Syllable-sized units in visual word recognition: Evidence from skilled and beginning readers of French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 507-532.
8. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
9. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. C. (2001). DRC: A dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
10. Dahl, P. R. (1979). An experimental program for teaching high speed word recognition and comprehension skills. In J. E. Button, T. Lovitt, & T. Rowland (Eds.), Communications research in learning disabilities and mental retardation (pp. 33-65). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
11. de Jong, P. F., & Share, D. L. (2007). Orthographic learning during oral and silent reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 55-71.
12. Di Filippo, G., de Luca, M., Judica, A., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (2006). Lexicality and stimulus length effects in Italian dyslexics: Role of the overadditivity effect. Child Neuropsychology, 12, 141-149.
13. Ehri, L.C. (1992). Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogy. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 13-26.
14. Hintikka, S., Landerl, K., Aro, M., & Lyytinen, H. (2008). Training reading fluency: Is it important to practice reading aloud and is generalization possible? Annals of Dyslexia, 58, 59-79.
15. Holopainen, L., Ahonen, T., & Lyytinen, H. (2001). Predicting delay in reading achievement in a highly transparent language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 401-413.
16. Huemer, S., Landerl, K., Aro, M., & Lyytinen, H. (2008). Training reading fluency among poor readers of German: Many ways to the goal? Annals of Dyslexia, 58, 115-137.
17. Häyrinen, T., Serenius-Sirve, S., Korkman, M. (1999). Lukilasse [Screening test of reading, spelling and arithmetic for grade levels 1-6]. Helsinki, Finland: Psykologien kustannus Oy.
18. Judica, A., De Luca, M., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti P. (2002). Training of developmental surface dyslexia improves reading performance and shortens eye fixation duration in reading. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 12, 177-198.
19. Korkman, M., Kirk, U., & Kemp, S. (1997). Lasten neuropsykologinen tutkimus. [NEPSY. A developmental neuropsychological assessment]. Helsinki, Finland: Psykologien Kustannus Oy.
20. Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21.
21. Kyöstiö, O. K. (1980). Is learning to read easy in a language in which the grapheme-phoneme correspondences are regular? In J. F. Kavanagh & R. I. Venezky (Eds.), Orthography, reading, and dyslexia (pp. 35-49). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
22. Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315-334.
23. Landi, N., Perfetti, C. A., Bolger, D. J., Dunlap, S., & Foorman, B. R. (2006). The role of discourse context in developing word form representations: A paradoxical relation between reading and learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 114-133.
24. Leinonen, S., Müller, K., Leppänen, P. H. T., Aro, M., Ahonen, T., & Lyytinen, H. (2001). Heterogeneity in adult dyslexic readers: Relating processing skills to the speed and accuracy of oral text reading. Reading and Writing, 14, 265-296.
25. Lemoine, H. E., Levy, B. A., & Hutchinson, A. (1993). Increasing the naming speed of poor readers: Representations formed across repetitions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 297-328.
26. Levy, B. A. (2001). Moving the bottom: Improving reading fluency. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 357-379). Timonium, MD: York Press.
27. Levy, B. A., Abello, B., & Lysyncchuk, L. (1997). Transfer from word training to reading in context: Gains in reading fluency and comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 173-188.
28. Levy, B. A., Bourassa, D. C., & Horn, C. (1999). Fast and slow namers: Benefits of segmentation and whole word training. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 115-138.
29. Lovett, M. W., Warren-Chaplin, P. M., Ransby, M. J., & Borden, S. L. (1990). Training word recognition skills of reading disabled children: Treatment and transfer effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 769-780.
30. Marinus, E., & de Jong, P. F. (2008). The use of sublexical clusters in normal and dyslexic readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 253-280.
31. Martens, V. E. G., & de Jong, P. F. (2006). The effect of visual word features on the acquisition of orthographic knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 337-356.
32. Martin-Chang, S. L., & Levy, B. A. (2005). Fluency transfer: Differential gains in reading speed and accuracy following isolated word and context training. Reading and Writing, 18, 343-376.
33. Martin-Chang, S. L., Levy, B. A., & O'Neil, S. (2007). Word acquisition, retention, and transfer: Findings from contextual and isolated word training. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 37-56.
34. Niemi, J., Laine, M., & Tuominen, J. (1994). Cognitive morphology in Finnish: Foundations of a new model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 423-446.
35. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145-173). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested Incremental Modelling in the Development of Computational Theories: The CDP+ Model of Reading Aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273-315.
37. Raven, J. C. (1956). Coloured Progressive Matrices. Oxford, UK: Information Press.
38. Reitsma, P. (1983). Printed word learning in beginning readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 36, 321-339.
39. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218.
40. Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: Adirect test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95-129.
41. Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz B. A. (2005). Dyslexia (Specific reading disability). Biological Psychiatry, 1301-1309.
42. Spinelli, D., de Luca, M., Di Filippo, G., Mancini, M., Martelli, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2005). Length effect in word naming latencies: Role of reading experience and reading deficit. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27, 217-235.
43. Tan, A., & Nicholson, T. (1997). Flashcards revisited: Training poor readers to read words faster improves their comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 276-288.
44. Thaler, V., Ebner, E. M., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (2004). Training reading fluency in dysfluent readers with high reading accuracy: Word specific effects but low transfer to untrained words. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 89-113.
45. Tressoldi, P. E., Vio, C., & Iozzino, R. (2007). Efficacy of an intervention to improve fluency in children with developmental dyslexia in a regular orthography. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 203-209.
46. Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - III (WISC-III) [Finnish]. Helsinki, Finland: Psykologien Kustannus.
47. Wentink, W. M. H., van Bon, W. H. J., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Training poor readers' phonological decoding skills: Evidence for syllable bound processing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 163-192.
48. Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1-33.
49. Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Poor reading: A deficit in skill automatization or a phonological deficit? Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 321-340.
50. Yap, R., & van der Leij, A. (1993). Word processing in dyslexics: An automatic decoding deficit? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 261-279.
51. Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3-29.
52. Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., My-Wyatt, A., Ladner, D., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2003). Developmental dyslexia in different languages: Language-specific or universal? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 169-193.
53. Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Judica, A., Orlandi, M., & Spinelli, D. (1999). Markers of developmental surface dyslexia in a language (Italian) with high grapheme-phoneme correspondence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 191-216.