Addressing semantics promotes the development of reading fluency

Applied Psycholinguistics

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 247-265

  Berends, Inez E ^a   Reitsma, Pieter ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644910401     PISSN: 01427164     EISSN: 14691817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0142716406060279     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Archer, N., & Bryant, P. (2001). Investigating the role of context in learning to read: A direct test of Goodman's model. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 579-591.
2. Aro, M., & Wimmer, H. (2003). Learning to read: English in comparison to six more regular orthographies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 621-635.
3. Badian, N. A. (2001). Phonological and orthographic processing: Their roles in reading prediction. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 179-202.
4. Bowers, P. G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing : An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 69-85.
5. Brady, S., & Shankweiler, D. P. (Eds.). (1991). Phonological processes in literacy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Breznitz, Z. (1997). Effects of accelerated reading rate on memory for text among dyslexic readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 289-297.
7. Brus, B. Th., & Voeten, M. J. M. (1973). Eén-Minuut-Test. Nijmegen: Berkhout Nijmegen B.V.
8. Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition, 91, 77-111.
9. Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386-406.
10. Dixon, M., Stuart, M., & Masterson, J. (2002). The relationship between phonological awareness and the development of orthographic representations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 295-316.
11. Donker, A., Berends, I., & Reitsma, P. (2004). The effect of feedback on child-computer interaction. In H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 197- 210). Münster, Germany: Waxmann Verlag GmbH.
12. Ehri, L. C. (2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In M. S. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 135-154). Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the national reading panel's meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250-287.
14. Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1983). Development of word identification speed in skilled and less skilled beginning readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 3-18.
15. Elbro, C. (1996). Early linguistic abilities and reading development: A review and a hypothesis about distinctness of phonological representations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 453-485.
16. Georgiewa, P., Rzanny, R., Gaser, C., Gerhard, U., Vieweg, U., Freesmeyer, D., et al. (2002). Phonological processing in dyslexic children: A study combining functional imaging and event related potentials. Neuroscience Letters, 318, 5-8.
17. Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Erlbaum.
18. Hagtvet, B. E. (2003). Listening comprehension and reading comprehension in poor decoders: Evidence for the importance of syntactic and semantic skills as well as phonological skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 505-539.
19. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662-720.
20. Hutzler, F., Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Wimmer, H., & Zorzi, M. (2004). Do current connectionist learning models account for reading development in different languages? Cognition, 91, 273-296.
21. Ischebeck, A., Indefrey, P., Usui, N., Nose, I., Helwig, F., & Taira, M. (2004). Reading in a regular orthography: An fMRI study investigating the role of visual familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 727-741.
22. Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., & Pfeiffer, S. L. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453-464.
23. Laing, E., & Hulme, C. (1999). Phonological and semantic processes influence beginning readers' ability to learn to read words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 183-207.
24. Lemoine, H. E., Levy, B. A., & Hutchinson, A. (1993). Increasing the naming speed of poor readers: Representations formed across repetitions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 297-328.
25. Mayringer, H., & Wimmer, H. (2000). Pseudoname learning by German-speaking children with dyslexia: Evidence for a phonological learning deficit. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75, 116-133.
26. Morris, R. D., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., et al. (1998). Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 347-373.
27. Nicholson, T. (1991). Do children read words better in context or in lists? A classic study revisited. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 444-450.
28. Norbury, C. F., & Chiat, S. (2000). Semantic intervention to support word recognition: A single-case study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 16, 141-163.
29. Perfetti, C. A. (1977). Language comprehension and fast decoding: Some psycholinguistic prerequisites for skilled reading comprehension. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Cognition, curriculum and comprehension (pp. 20-41). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
30. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189-213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32. Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. A., Jenner, A. R., Katz, L., Frost, S. J., Lee, J. R., et al. (2001). Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 479-492.
33. Reitsma, P. (1983). Printed word learning in beginning readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 36, 321-339.
34. Sandak, R., Mencl, W. E., Frost, S. J., & Pugh, K. R. (2004). The neurobiological basis of skilled and impaired reading: Recent findings and new directions. Scientific Studies of Reading, 83, 273-292.
35. Sandak, R., Mencl, W. E., Frost, S. J., Rueckl, J. G., Katz, L., Moore, D., et al. (2004). The neurobiology of adaptive learning in reading: A contrast of different training conditions. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 67-88.
36. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218.
37. Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95-129.
38. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
39. Tan, A., & Nicholson, T. (1997). Flashcards revisited: Training poor readers to read words faster improves their comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 276-288.
40. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276-286.
41. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., et al. (1999). Preventing reading failure in children with phonological processing difficulties: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 579-593.
42. van den Bosch, K., & van Bon, W. H. J., & Schreuder, R. (1995). Poor readers' decoding skills: Effects of training with limited exposure duration. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 110-125.
43. van Loon-Vervoorn, W. A. (1985). Voorstelbaarheidswaarden van Nederlandse woorden. Lisse, Switzerland: Swets & Zeitlinger.
44. Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2-40.
45. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415-438.
46. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (2000). Naming-speed processes and developmental reading disabilities: An introduction to the special issue on the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 322-324.
47. Yap, R., & van der Leij, A. (1993). Word processing in dyslexics: An automatic decoding deficit? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 261-279.