Testing the roles of species native origin and family membership in intentional plant introductions using nursery data across the state of Kentucky

Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society

Volumn 136, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 122-127

  Harris, Courtney ^a   Jiang, Hao ^a   Liu, Dongjiao ^a   Brian, Zachary ^a   He, Kate ^a  

^a MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

family membership; intentional plant introduction; invasive species; Kentucky; nursery plants; species native origin

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ECOSYSTEM STRUCTURE; HORTICULTURE; HUMAN ACTIVITY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INVASIVE SPECIES; TAXONOMY;

KENTUCKY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77954639896     PISSN: 10955674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3159/08-RA-080R1.1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. ALLEN, C. R., A. S. GARMESTANI, J. A. LABRAM, A. E. PECK, AND L. B. PREVOST. 2006. When landscaping goes bad: the incipient invasion of Mahonia bealei in the Southeastern United. States. Biol. Invasions 8: 169-176.
2. BASKIN, Y. 2002. A Plague of Rats and Rubbervines: the Growing Threat of Species Invasion. Island Press, Washington, DC. 377 p.
3. COHEN, A. N. AND J. T. CARLTON. 1998. Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded, estuary. Science 279: 555-558.
4. DAEHLER, C. C. AND D. A. CARINO. 2000. Predicting invasive plants: prospects for a general, screening system based, on current regional models. Biol. Invasions 2: 93-102.
5. D'ANTONIO, C. M. AND P. M. VITOUSEK. 1992. Biological, invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/ fire cycle and global change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 63-87.
6. DEHNEN-SCHMUTZ, K., J. TOUZA, C. PERRINGS, AND M. WILLIAMSON. 2007. The horticultural trade and ornamental plant invasions in Britain. Conserv. Biol. 21: 224-231.
7. DILLENBURG, L. R., D. F. WHIGHAM, A. H. TERAMURA, AND I. N. FORSETH. 1993. Effects of below-and aboveground competition from the vines Lonicera japonica and Parthenociisus quinquefolio on the growth of the tree host Liquidambar styraciflua. Oecologia 93: 48-54.
8. ELLSTRAND, N. C. AND K. A. SCHIERENBECK. 2006. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Euphytica 148: 35-46.
9. EWEL, J. J., D. J. O'DOWD, J. BERGELSON, C. C. DAEHLER, C. M. D'ANTONIO, L. D. GOMEZ, D. R. GORDON, R. J. HOBBS, A. HOLT, K. R. HOPPER, C. E. HUGHES, M. LAHART, R. R. B. LEAKEY, W. G. LEE, L. L. LOOPE, D. H. LORENCE, S. M. LOUDA, A. E. LUGO, P. B. MCEVOY, D. M. RICHARDSON, AND P. M. VITOUSEK. 1999. Deliberate introductions of species: research, needs. BioScience 49: 619-630.
10. FERNALD, M. L. 1950. Gray's Manual of Botany. Dioscorides Press, Portland, OR. 1632 p.
11. GUO, Q., H. QIAN, R. E. RlCKLEFS, AND W. Xi. 2006. Distributions of exotic plants in eastern Asia and North America. Ecol. Lett. 9: 827-834.
12. HAMILTON, M. A., B. R. MURRAY, M. W. CADOTTE, G. C. HOSE, A. C. BAKER, C. J. HARRIS, AND D. LicARi. 2005. Life-history correlates of plant invasiveness at regional and continental scales. Ecol. Lett. 8: 1066-1074.
13. HERRON, P. M., C. T. MARTINE, A. M. LATIMER, AND S. A. LEICHT-YOUNG. 2007. Invasive plants and their ecological strategies: prediction and explanation of woody plant invasion in New England. Divers. Distrib. 13: 633-644.
14. HOLM, L., J. DOLL, E. HOLM, J. PAMCHO, AND J. HERBERGER. 1997. World Weeds: Natural History and Distribution. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. 391 p.
15. JONES, R. L. 2005. Plant Life of Kentucky: An Illustrated. Guide to the Vascular Flora. The University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
16. JUDD, W. S., C. S. CAMPBELL, E. A. KELLOGG, P. F. STEVENS, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 2002. Plant Systematics-A Phylogenetic Approach. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA. 576 p.
17. KOLAR, C. S. AND D. M. LODGE. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 199-204.
18. KRIVANEK, M. AND P. PYŚEK. 2006. Predicting invasions by woody species in a temperate zone: a test of three risk assessment schemes in the Czech Republic (Central Europe). Divers. Distrib. 12: 319-327.
19. KY-EPPC. 2000. Invasive exotic plant list.
20. LEE, C. E. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 386-391.
21. LEVINE, J. M., M. VILA, C. M. D'ANTONIO, J. S. DUKES, K. GRIGULIS, AND S. LAVOREL. 2003. Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. Bio. 270: 775-781.
22. Li, Y., Z. CHENG, Y. PEI, K. LOU, D. ZHAO, Q. YAO, H. DUAN, AND Q. LI. 2004. Invasive ornamental plants: problems, challenges, and molecular tools to neutralize their invasiveness. CRC Cr. Rev. Plant Sci. 23: 381-389.
23. LOCKWOOD, J. L., P. CASSEY, AND T. BLACKBURN. 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 223-228.
24. MACK, R. N., D. SIMBERLOFF, W. M. LONSDALE, H. EVANS, M. CLOUT, AND F. A. BAZZAZ. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10: 689-710.
25. MACK, R. N. AND M. ERNEBERG. 2002. The United States naturalized flora: largely the product of deliberate introductions. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 89: 176-189.
26. MERRIAM, E. W. AND E. FEIL. 2002. The potential impact of an introduced shrub on native plant diversity and forest regeneration. Biol. Invasions 4: 369-373.
27. MORSE, L. E., J. T. KARTESZ, AND L. S. KUTNER. 1995. Native vascular plants, p. 205-209. In E. T. LaRoe, G. S. Farris, C. E. Puckett, P. D. Doran, and M. J. Mac [eds.], Our Living Resources: A Report to the Nation on the Distribution, Abundance, and Health of U.S. Plants, Animals and Ecosystems. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, Washington, DC.
28. PANETTA, F. D. 1993. A system of assessing proposed plant introductions for weed potential. Plant Prot. Quart. 8: 10-14.
29. PETERS, W. L., M. H. MEYER, AND N. ANDERSON. 2006. Minnesota horticultural industry survey on invasive plants. Euphytica 148: 75-86.
30. PIMENTEL, D., R. ZUNIGA, AND D. MORRISON. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 52: 273-288.
31. PYŚEK, P. 1998. Is there a taxonomie patter to plant invasions? Oikos 82: 282-294.
32. PYŚEK, P., V. JAROSIK, AND T. KUCERA. 2002. Patterns of invasion in temperate nature reserves Biol. Conserv. 104: 13-24.
33. PYŚEK, P., D. M. RICHARDSON, M. REJMÁNEK, G. L. WEBSTER, M. WILLIAMSON, AND J. KIRSCHNER. 2004. Alien plants in checklists and floras: toward better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53: 131-143.
34. QIAN, H. AND R. E. RICKLEFS. 2000. Large-scale processes and the Asian bias in temperate plant species diversity. Nature 407: 180-182.
35. QIAN, H. AND R. E. RICKLEFS. 2004. Geographical distribution and ecological conservatism of disjunct genera of vascular plants in eastern Asia and eastern North America. Ecology 92: 253-265.
36. QIAN, H. 2001. Diversity in temperate plants in East Asia. Nature 413: 129-1.30.
37. QIAN, H. 2002. Floristic relationships between Eastern Asia and North America: test of Gray's hypothesis. Am. Nat. 160: 317-332.
38. REICHARD, S. AND C. HAMILTON. 1997. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv. Biol. 11: 1993-1203.
39. REICHARD, S. H. AND P. WHITE. 2001. Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States. BioScience 51: 103-113.
40. REJMÁNEK, M., D. M. RICHARDSON, S. I. HIGGINS, M. J. PiTCAiRN, AND E. GROTKOPP. 2005. Ecology of invasive plants: state of the art, p. 104-161. In H. A. Mooney, R. N. Mack, J. A. McNeely, L. E. Neville, P. J. Schei, and J. K. Waage [eds.], Invasive Alien Species: A New Synthesis. Island. Press, Washington, DC.
41. RICHARDSON, D. M. AND M. REJMÁNEK. 2004. Conifers as invasive aliens: a global survey and predictive framework. Divers. Distrib. 10: 321-331.
42. RICKLEFS, R. E., H. QIAN, AND P. S. WHITE. 2004. The region effect on mesoscale plant species richness between eastern Asia and eastern North America. Ecography 27: 129-136.
43. STAGE, C. A. 1991. New Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
44. WEBSTER, C. R., M. A. JENKINS, AND S. JOSE. 2006. Woody invaders and the challenges they pose to forest ecosystems in the eastern United States. J. Forest. 104: 366-374.
45. WILLIAM, L. P., M. H. MEYER, AND N. O. ANDERSON. 2006. Minnesota horticultural, industry survey on invasive plants. Euphytica 148: 75-86.
46. WILLIAMSON, M. H. AND A. FITTER. 1996. The characters of successful invaders. Biol. Conserv. 78: 163-170.