Response simulation and seismic assessment of highway overcrossings

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 991-1013

  Kotsoglou, Anastasios ^a   Pantazopoulou, Stavroula ^a  

^a DEMOCRITUS UNIVERSITY OF THRACE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Abutments; Highway overcrossings; Pushover curve; Seismic assessment; Seismic response; Soil structure interaction

Indexed keywords

ABUTMENTS (BRIDGE); DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EMBANKMENTS; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES; OVERPASSES; PILE FOUNDATIONS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOILS; STREAM FLOW;

ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE; BRIDGE STRUCTURES; CAPACITY CURVES; EARTH EMBANKMENT; EMBANKMENT FILL; EMBANKMENT SOILS; GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS; GROUND EXCITATION; HIGHWAY OVERCROSSINGS; INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; INTERACTION EFFECT; MATERIAL PROPERTY; NEW DESIGN; PARAMETERIZED; PARAMETRIC STUDY; PRACTICAL PROCEDURES; PUSHOVER CURVE; SEISMIC ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DISPLACEMENT; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; SHORT BRIDGES; SIMULATION PROCEDURES; SOIL MASS; SUPPORT CONDITIONS;

DYNAMIC RESPONSE;

BRIDGE; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EMBANKMENT; MODELING; MOTORWAY; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION;

EID: 77954590414     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.982     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Priestley MJN, Seible F, Calvi GM. Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges. Wiley: New York, 1996.
2. Kappos A, Potikas P, Sextos A. Seismic assessment of an overpass bridge accounting for non-linear material and soil response and varying boundary conditions. Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN 2007), Rethymnon, Greece, 2007.
3. Mackie K, Stojadinovic B. Seismic demands for performance-based design of bridges. PEER Report 2003/16. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2003.
4. Sextos A, Taskari O. Single and multi-platform simulation of linear and non-linear bridge-soil systems. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security: Coupled Site and Soil-Structure Interaction Effects with Application to Seismic Risk Mitigation. Springer: Berlin, 2009; Part III, 225-239.
5. Wilson JC, Tan BS. Bridge abutments: formulation of a simple model for earthquake response analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1990; 116(8):1828-1837.
6. Wilson JC, Tan BS. Bridge abutments: assessing their influence on earthquake response of Meloland road overpass. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1990; 116(8):1838-1856.
7. McCallen DB, Romstad KM. Dynamic analysis of a skewed short-span, box-girder overpass. Earthquake Spectra 1994; 10(4):729-755.
8. Goel RK, Chopra AK. Evaluation of bridge abutment capacity and stiffness during earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra 1997; 13(1):1-23.
9. ACI-341. Earthquake resistant concrete bridges. State of the Art Summary of Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Techniques for Concrete Bridges (DRAFT), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hill, MI, 2003.
10. CALTRANS. CALTRANS Seismic Design Criteria, Version 1.4, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, U.S.A. 2006.
11. ATC-6. Seismic Design Guidelines for Highway Bridges, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, 1981.
12. ATC-32. Improved Seismic Design Criteria for California Bridges: Provisional Recommendations, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, 1996.
13. Gazetas G. Seismic response of earth dams: Some recent developments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1987; 6(1):3-47.
14. Wissawapaisal C. Modelling the seismic response of short bridges. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1999.
15. Inel M. Displacement-based strategies for the performance-based seismic design of 'short' bridges considering embankment flexibility. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2001.
16. Inel M, Aschheim MA. Seismic design of columns of short bridges accounting for embankment flexibility. Journal of Structural Engineering 2004; 130(10):1515-1528.
17. Zhang J, Makris N. Kinematic response functions and dynamic stiffnesses of bridge embankments. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:1967-1991.
18. Zhang J, Makris N. Seismic response analysis of highway overcrossings including soil-structure interaction. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:1933-1966.
19. Zhang J, Makris N. Seismic response of highway overcrossings including soil-structure interaction. Report No. UCB/PEER 2001/02, University of California, Berkeley, February 2001.
20. Price TE, Eberhard MO. Effects of spatially varying ground motions on short bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering 1998; 124(8):948-955.
21. Price TE, Eberhard MO. Factors contributing to bridge-embankment interaction. Journal of Structural Engineering 2005; 131(9):1345-1354.
22. Kotsoglou A, Pantazopoulou S. Dynamic response of short integral concrete bridges considering soil-structure interaction and embankment flexibility. 2nd FIB International Congress, Naples, Italy, 2006.
23. Kotsoglou A, Pantazopoulou S. Modeling of embankment flexibility and soil-structure interaction in integral bridges. First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
24. Kotsoglou A, Pantazopoulou S. Bridge-embankment interaction under transverse ground excitation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36(12):1719-1740.
25. Kotsoglou A, Pantazopoulou S. Seismic performance and limit state assessment of highway overcrossings. COMPDYN 2007-Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Rethymno, Greece, 13-16 June 2007.
26. Kotsoglou A, Pantazopoulou S. Soil-Structure Interaction: Capacity Curve Evaluation and Seismic Assessment of Highway Overcrossings. 4th ICEGE-International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece, 25-28 June 2007.
27. Kotsoglou A, Pantazopoulou S. Assessment and modeling of embankment participation in the seismic response of integral abutment bridges. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2009; 7:343-361.
28. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Applying incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Spectra 2004; 20(2):523-553.
29. AASHTO-83, Guide Specifications for Seismic Design of Highway Bridges. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials: Washington, DC, 1988.
30. Iwasaki T, Tatsuoka F, Takagi Y. Shear moduli of sands under cyclic torsional shear loading. Soils and Foundations 1978; 18(1):39-56.
31. Tatsuoka F, Iwasaki T, Takagi Y. Hysteretic damping of sands under cyclic loading and its relation to shear modulus. Soils and Foundations 1978; 18(2):25-40.
32. Vucetic M, Dobry R. Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1991; 117(1):89-107.
33. Seed HB, Idriss IM. Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis. Report No. EERC70-10, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1970.
34. Fajfar P. Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28(9):979-993.
35. Fajfar P. A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. EERI Earthquake Spectra 2000; 16(3):573-592.
36. Chopra AK, Goel RK. Capacity-demand-diagram methods based on inelastic design spectrum. EERI Earthquake Spectra 1999; 15(4):637-656.
37. Aschheim M, Black E. Yield point spectra for seismic design and rehabilitation, Earthquake Spectra. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute 2000; 16(2):317-335.
38. FEMA-274. NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report No. FEMA-274, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., October 1997.
39. Newmark NM, Hall WJ. Seismic design criteria for nuclear reactor facilities, building practices for disaster mitigation. Report No. 46, National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1973; 209-236.
40. Cuesta I, Aschheim M. Inelastic response spectra using conventional and pulse R-factors. Journal of Structural Engineering 2001; 127(9):1013-1020.
41. Cuesta I, Aschheim M, Fajfar P. Simplified R-factor relationships for strong ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 2003; 19(1):25-45.
42. Mavroeidis GP, Dong G, Papageorgiou AS. Near-fault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33: 1023-1049.
43. Mylonakis G, Voyagaki E. Yielding oscillator subjected to simple pulse waveforms: numerical analysis & closed-form solutions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(15):1949-1974.
44. Panagiotakos TB, Fardis MN. Deformation of reinforced concrete members at yielding and ultimate. ACI Structural Journal 2001; 98(2):135-148.
45. FEMA-356. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
46. Bowles J. Foundation Analysis and Design (5th edn). McGraw-Hill: New York, 1996.