Bridge-embankment interaction under transverse ground excitation

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 36, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1719-1740

  Kotsoglou, Anastasios ^a   Pantazopoulou, Stavroula ^a  

^a DEMOCRITUS UNIVERSITY OF THRACE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Bridge embankments; Embankment flexibility; Seismic response; Soil structure interaction

Indexed keywords

ABUTMENTS (BRIDGE); BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EMBANKMENTS; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SHEAR DEFORMATION;

BRIDGE EMBANKMENTS; EMBANKMENT FLEXIBILITY; GROUND EXCITATION;

SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS;

BRIDGE; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EMBANKMENT; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GROUND MOTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION;

EID: 34648819960     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.715     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Priestley MJN, Seible F, Calvi GM. Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges. Wiley: New York, 1996.
2. ACI-341 Earthquake Resistant Concrete Bridges. State of the Art Summary of Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Techniques for Concrete Bridges (DRAFT). American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hill, MI, 2003.
3. McCallen DB, Romstad KM. Dynamic analysis of a skewed short-span, Box-Girder Overpass. Earthquake Spectra 1994; 10(4):729-755.
4. Inel M. Displacement-based strategies for the performance-based seismic design of 'short' bridges considering embankment flexibility. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign, IL, 2001.
5. Inel M, Aschheim MA. Seismic design of columns of short bridges accounting for embankment flexibility. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2004; 130(10):1515-1528.
6. CALTRANS. Bridge Design Aids 14-1. California Department of Transportation: Sacramento, CA, 1989.
7. CALTRANS SDC. Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria version 1.1. California Department of Transportation: Sacramento, CA, 1999.
8. ATC-6. Seismic Design Guidelines for Highway Bridges. Applied Technology Council: Redwood City, CA, 1996.
9. ATC-32. Improved Seismic Design Criteria for California Bridges: Provisional Recommendations. Applied Technology Council: Redwood City, CA, 1996.
10. Gazetas G. Seismic response of earth dams: some recent developments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1987; 6(1):3-47.
11. Wilson JC, Tan BS. Bridge abutments: formulation of a simple model for earthquake response analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1990; 116(8):1828-1837.
12. Wilson JC, Tan BS. Bridge abutments: assessing their influence on earthquake response of Meloland Road Overpass. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1990; 116(8):1838-1856.
13. Wissawapaisal C. Modelling the seismic response of short bridges. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign, IL, 1999.
14. Zhang J, Makris N. Kinematic response functions and dynamic stiffnesses of bridge embankments. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:1933-1966.
15. Zhang J, Makris N. Seismic response analysis of highway overcrossings including soil-structure interaction. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:1967-1991.
16. Zhang J, Makris N. Seismic response of highway overcrossings including soil-structure interaction. Report No: UCB/PEER 2001/02, University of California, Berkeley, CA, February 2001.
17. AASHTO-83. Guide Specifications for Seismic Design of Highway Bridges. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials: Washington, DC, 1988.
18. Iwasaki T, Tatsuoka F, Takagi Y. Shear moduli of sands under cyclic torsional shear loading. Soils and Foundations 1978; 18(1):39-56.
19. Tatsuoka F, Iwasaki T, Takagi Y. Hysteretic damping of sands under cyclic loading and its relation to shear modulus. Soils and Foundations 1978; 18(2):25-40.
20. Vucetic M, Dobry R. Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (ASCE) 1991; 117(1):89-107.
21. Seed HB, Idriss IM. Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis. Report No. EERC70-10, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1970.
22. Cosmos Virtual Data Center. Consortium of Organizations for Strong-Motion Observation Systems. Cosmos Virtual Data Center.
23. Kotsoglou A, Pantazopoulou S. Dynamic response of short integral concrete bridges considering soil-structure interaction and embankment flexibility. Second FIB International Congress, Naples, Italy, 2006.
24. Kotsoglou. A, Pamazopoulou. S. Modeling of embankment flexibility and soil-structure interaction in integral bridges. First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
25. Priestley MJN, Ranzo G, Benzoni G, Kowalsky MI. Yield displacement of circular bridge columns. Proceedings of the 4th Caltrans Seismic Research, California Department of Transportation Engineering Center: Sacramento, CA, 1996.
26. Lehman DE, Calderone AJ, Moehle JP. Behavior and design of slender columns subjected to lateral loading. Sixth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, WA, 1998.
27. Panagiotakos TB, Fardis MN. Deformation of reinforced concrete members at yielding and ultimate. ACI Structural Journal 2001; 98(2):135-148.