Factors contributing to bridge-embankment interaction

Journal of Structural Engineering

Volumn 131, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1345-1354

  Price, T E ^a   Eberhard, M O ^b  

^a City College of New York   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Bridge foundations; Embankments; Performance characteristics; Seismic response; Soil structure interaction

Indexed keywords

BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS; PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; CONCRETE BRIDGES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SEISMOLOGY; SOIL MECHANICS; STIFFNESS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EMBANKMENTS;

EID: 27644518696     PISSN: 07339445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:9(1345)     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Applied Technology Council (ATC) (1996). "Improved seismic design criteria for California bridges: Provisional recommendations." ATC-32, Redwood City, Calif.
2. Clough, R. W., and Penzien, J. (1993). Dynamics of structures, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
3. Crouse, C. B., and Price, T. (1993). "Dynamic soil-foundation interaction at the Meloland Road overcrossing." Proc. ASCE Structural Engineering in Natural Hazards Mitigation, Irvine, Calif., Vol. 1, 355-360.
4. Douglas, B. M., Crouse, C. B., Werner, S. D., and Maragakis, E. A. (1993). "Quick release dynamic tests of the Meloland Road Overcrossing." Rep. Prepared for CALTrans, Sacramento, Calif.
5. Eringen, A. C., and Suhubi, E. S. (1975). Elastodynamics, Vol. II, Academic, New York.
6. Gates, J. H., and Smith, M. J. (1982). "Verification of dynamic modeling methods by prototype excitation." Rep. No. FHWA/CA/SD-82/07, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, Calif.
7. Goel, R. K. (1997). "Earthquake characteristics of bridges with integral abutments." J. Struct. Eng., 123(11), 1435-1443.
8. Goel, R. K., and Chopra, A. K. (1997). "Evaluation of bridge abutment capacity and stiffness during earthquakes." Earthquake Spectra, 13(1), 1-23.
9. Heuze, F. E., Ueng, T., Hutchings, L., Jarpe, S., and Kasameyer, P. (1997). "A coupled seismic-geotechnical approach to site-specific strong motion." Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 16, 259-272.
10. Humar, J. L. (1990). Dynamics of structures, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
11. Maragakis, E. A., Douglas, B. M., and Abdel-Ghaffar, S. M. (1994). "An equivalent linear finite element approach for the estimation of pile foundation stiffnesses." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 23, 1115-1124.
12. Maroney, B., Romstad, K., and Chajes, M. (1990). "Interpretation of Rio Dell freeway response during six recorded earthquake events." Proc., 4th U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Palm Springs, Calif.
13. McCallen, D. B., and Romstad, K. M. (1994). "Dynamic analyses of a skewed short-span box-girder overpass." Earthquake Spectra, 10(4), 729-755.
14. Price, T. E. (1997). "Influence of embankment/superstructure interaction on the seismic response of bridges." PhD dissertation, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
15. Price, T. E., and Eberhard, M. O. (1998). "Model for incorporating embankment/superstructure interaction into bridge analysis." Proc., Structural Engineering World Congress, San Francisco.
16. Price, T. E., Owen, A. N., and Smith, R. C. (2000). "Serviceability vibration evaluation of long floor systems." Proc., 14th Engineering Mechanics Conf., ASCE, Reston, Va.
17. Reimer, M., Salgado, R., and Mitchell, J. K. (1993). "Dynamic properties of Painter Street soils." Rep. No. UCB/GT-93/07, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
18. Roesset, J. M., Whitman, R. V., and Dobry, R. (1973). "Modal analysis for structures with foundation interaction." J. Struct. Div. ASCE, 99(3), 399-416.
19. Sweet, J., and Morrill, K. B. (1993). "Nonlinear soil-structure interaction simulation of the Painter Street Overcrossing." Proc., 2nd Annual Caltrans Seismic Research Workshop, Sacramento, Calif.
20. Ventura, C. E., Finn, W. D. L., Wagner, P. R., and Felber, A. J. (1995). "Ambient vibration studies of three short-span reinforced concrete bridges." Proc., 11th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico.
21. Vucetic, M., and Dobry, R. (1991). "Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response." J. Geotech. Eng., 117(1), 89-107.
22. Werner, S. D. (1993). "Study of Caltrans' seismic evaluation procedures for short bridge overcrossing structures." Dames and Moore, Inc., Oakland, Calif.
23. Werner, S. D., Beck, J. L., and Levine, M. B. (1987). "Seismic response evaluation of Meloland Road Overpass using 1979 Imperial Valley Earthquake records." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 15, 249-274.
24. Wilson, J. C., and Justason, M. (1996). "Three-dimensional modeling of stiffness characteristics for highway bridge abutments." Proc., 4th National Workshop on Bridge Research in Progress. Rep. No. NCEER-96-BRIP, MCEER, Buffalo, N.Y.
25. Wilson, J. C., and Tan, B. S. (1990). "Bridge abutments: formulation of a simple model for earthquake response analysis." J. Eng. Mech., 116(8), 1828-1837.
26. Wolf, J. P. (1994). Foundation vibration analysis using simple physical models, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
27. Zhang, J., and Makris, N. (2001). "Seismic response analysis of highway overcrossings including soil-structure interaction." Rep. No. UCB/PEER 2001/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, Calif.