Dependency-based paraphrasing for recognizing textual entailment

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 83-88

  Marsi, Erwin ^a   Krahmer, Emiel ^a   Bosma, Wauter ^b  

^a Department of International Business Law   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TEXT PROCESSING;

ADDED VALUES; DATA SET; DEPENDENCY TREES; ITS APPLICATIONS; RECOGNIZING TEXTUAL ENTAILMENTS; TEST SETS;

TREES (MATHEMATICS);

EID: 85121233375     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. R. Bar-Haim, I. Dagan, B. Dolan, L. Ferro, D. Giampiccolo, B. Magnini, and I. Szpektor. 2006. The second pascal recognising textual entailment challenge. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, pages 1–9, Venice, Italy.
2. W. Bosma and C. Callison-Burch. 2006. Paraphrase substitution for recognizing textual entailment. In Proceedings of CLEF.
3. R. de Salvo Braz, R. Girju, V. Punyakanok, D. Roth, and M. Sammons. 2005. An inference model for semantic entailemnt in natural language. In Proceedings of the First Pascal Challenge Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment, pages 29–32.
4. A. Hickl, J. Williams, J. Bensley, K. Roberts, B. Rink, and Y. Shi. 2006. Recognizing textual entailment with lccs groundhog system. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, pages 80–85, Venice, Italy.
5. Dekang Lin and Patrick Pantel. 2001. Discovery of inference rules for question answering. Natural Language Engineering, 7(4):343–360.
6. Dekang Lin. 1998. Dependency-based evaluation of minipar. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Evaluation of Parsing Systems at LREC 1998, pages 317–330, Granada, Spain.
7. E. Marsi, E. Krahmer, W. Bosma, and M. Theune. 2006. Normalized alignment of dependency trees for detecting textual entailment. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, pages 56–61, venice, Italy.
8. Adam Meyers, Roman Yangarber, and Ralph Grisham. 1996. Alignment of shared forests for bilingual corpora. In Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-96), pages 460–465, Copenhagen, Denmark.
9. R. Nielsen, W. Ward, and J.H. Martin. 2006. Toward dependency path based entailment. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, pages 44–49, Venice, Italy.
10. R. Raina, A. Haghighi, C. Cox, J. Finkel, J. Michels, K. Toutanova, B. MacCartney, M.C. de Marneffe, C.D. Manning, and A.Y. Ng. 2005. Robust textual inference using diverse knowledge sources. In Proceedings of PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Workshop.
11. J. C. Reynar and A. Ratnaparkhi. 1997. A maximum entropy approach to identifying sentence boundaries. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, Washington, D.C.