Computing relative polarity for textual inference

ICoS 2006 - Inference in Computational Semantics, Workshop Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 67-76

  Nairn, Rowan ^a   Condoravdi, Cleo ^a   Karttunen, Lauri ^a  

^a PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA HANDLING; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; CANONICALIZATION; DETECTION PROCESS; DIFFERENT CLASS; DIFFERENT EFFECTS; EMBEDDINGS; NATURAL LANGUAGES; PROPAGATION ALGORITHM; RELATIVE POLARITY; SEMANTIC RELATIONS;

EMBEDDINGS;

EID: 37249032036     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Bobrow, D., C. Condoravdi, R. Crouch, R. Kaplan, L. Karttunen, T. King, V. de Paiva and A. Zaenen, A basic logic for textual inference, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Inference for Textual Question Answering, Pittsburgh, PA, 2005, http://www2.parc.com/istl/groups/nltt/papers/textual-inference.pdf.
2. Condoravdi, C., R. Crouch, R. Stolle, V. de Paiva and D. Bobrow, Entailment, intensionality and text understanding, in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Text Meaning, Human Language Technology Conference (HLT-NAACL-2003), Edmonton, Canada, 2003, http://www2.parc.com/spl/members/stolle/Papers/condoravdi-textmeaning.pdf.
3. Crouch, R., Packed rewriting for mapping semantics to KR, in: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Tilburg, the Netherlands, 2005, http://www2.parc.com/istl/groups/nltt/papers/iwcs05_crouch.pdf.
4. Crouch, R., R. Sauri and A. Fowler, AQUAINT pilot knowledge-based evaluation: Annotation guidelines (2005), http://www2.parc.com/istl/groups/nltt/papers/aquaint_kb_pilot_evaluation_guide.pdf.
5. Geis, M. and A. Zwicky, On invited inferences, Linguistic Inquiry 2 (1971), pp. 561-565.
6. Grice, H. P., Logic and conversation, in: P. Cole and J. L. Morgan, editors, Speech Acts, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1989 pp. 41-58.
7. Ido Dagan, O. G. and B. Magnini, The PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge, in: Proceedings of the PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, Southampton, U.K., 2005, http://www.cs.biu.ac.il/~glikmao/rte05/dagan_et_al.pdf.
8. Karttunen, L., Implicative verbs, Language 47 (1971), pp. 340-358.
9. Karttunen, L., The logic of English predicate complement constructions (1971), distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club. http://www2.parc.com/istl/members/karttune/publications/english_predicate.pdf.
10. Karttunen, L. and A. Zaenen, Veridicity, in: G. Katz, J. Pustejovsky and F. Schilder, editors, Annotating, Extracting and Reasoning about Time and Events, number 05151 in Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (2005), http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2005/314.
11. Kiparsky, P. and C. Kiparsky, Fact, in: D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits, editors, Semantics. An Inderdisciplinary Reader, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1971.
12. Zaenen, A., L. Karttunen and R. Crouch, Local textual inference: can it be defined or circumscribed?, in: Workshop on the Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment, Ann Arbor, MI, 2005, http://www2.parc.com/istl/members/karttune/publications/acl2005workshop.pdf.