Finding contradictions in text

ACL-08: HLT - 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1039-1047

  De Marneffe, Marie Catherine ^a,b   Rafferty, Anna N ^a,b   Manning, Christopher D ^a,b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPONENT BASED; COREFERENCE;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84859888583     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Roy Bar-Haim, Ido Dagan, Bill Dolan, Lisa Ferro, Danilo Giampiccolo, Bernardo Magnini, and Idan Szpektor. 2006. The second PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, Venice, Italy.
2. Nathanael Chambers, Daniel Cer, Trond Grenager, David Hall, Chloe Kiddon, Bill MacCartney, Marie- Catherine de Marneffe, Daniel Ramage, Eric Yeh, and Christopher D. Manning. 2007. Learning alignments and leveraging natural logic. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing.
3. Timothy Chklovski and Patrick Pantel. 2004. Verbocean: Mining the web for fine-grained semantic verb relations. In Proceedings of EMNLP-04.
4. Cleo Condoravdi, Dick Crouch, Valeria de Pavia, Reinhard Stolle, and Daniel G. Bobrow. 2003. Entailment, intensionality and text understanding. Workshop on Text Meaning (2003 May 31).
5. Koby Crammer and Yoram Singer. 2001. Ultraconservative online algorithms for multiclass problems. In Proceedings of COLT-2001.
6. Ido Dagan, Oren Glickman, and Bernardo Magnini. 2006. The PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge. In Quinonero-Candela et al., editor, MLCW 2005, LNAI Volume 3944, pages 177-190. Springer- Verlag.
7. Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Bill MacCartney, and Christopher D. Manning. 2006. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-06).
8. Christiane Fellbaum. 1998. WordNet: an electronic lexical database. MIT Press.
9. Jan Firbas. 1971. On the concept of communicative dynamism in the theory of functional sentence perspective. Brno Studies in English, 7:23-47.
10. Danilo Giampiccolo, Ido Dagan, Bernardo Magnini, and Bill Dolan. 2007. The third PASCAL recognizing textual entailment challenge. In Proceedings of the ACLPASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing.
11. Sanda Harabagiu, Andrew Hickl, and Finley Lacatusu. 2006. Negation, contrast, and contradiction in text processing. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-06).
12. Andrew Hickl, John Williams, Jeremy Bensley, Kirk Roberts, Bryan Rink, and Ying Shi. 2006. Recognizing textual entailment with LCC's GROUNDHOG system. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment.
13. Kevin Humphreys, Robert Gaizauskas, and Saliha Azzam. 1997. Event coreference for information extraction. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Operational Factors in Pratical, Robust Anaphora Resolution for Unrestricted Texts, 35th ACL meeting.
14. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics.
15. Bill MacCartney, Trond Grenager, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Daniel Cer, and Christopher D. Manning. 2006. Learning to recognize features of valid textual entailments. In Proceedings of the North American Association of Computational Linguistics (NAACL-06).
16. Daniel Marcu and Abdessamad Echihabi. 2002. An unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
17. Rowan Nairn, Cleo Condoravdi, and Lauri Karttunen. 2006. Computing relative polarity for textual inference. In Proceedings of ICoS-5.
18. Olivia Sanchez-Graillet and Massimo Poesio. 2007. Discovering contradiction protein-protein interactions in text. In Proceedings of BioNLP 2007: Biological, translational, and clinical language processing.
19. Lucy Vanderwende, Arul Menezes, and Rion Snow. 2006. Microsoft research at rte-2: Syntactic contributions in the entailment task: an implementation. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment.
20. Ellen Voorhees. 2008. Contradictions and justifications: Extensions to the textual entailment task. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. Annie Zaenen, Lauri Karttunen, and Richard S. Crouch. 2005. Local textual inference: can it be defined or circumscribed? In ACL 2005 Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment.
22. Fabio Massimo Zanzotto, Marco Pennacchiotti, and Alessandro Moschitti. 2007. Shallow semantics in fast textual entailment rule learners. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing.