Public engagement and the impact of fairness perceptions on decision favorability and acceptance

Science Communication

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 256-280

  Besley, John C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Fairness; Justice; Nuclear; Political communication; Public engagement

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954569890     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: 15528545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547009358624     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Besley, J.C. (2009). Focusing on fairness in science and risk communication. In L. Kahlor & P. Stout (Eds.), Communicating science: New agendas in science communication (pp. 68-87). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Besley, J.C., Kramer, V.L., Yao, Q., & Toumey, C.P. (2008). Interpersonal discussion following citizen engagement on emerging technology. Science Communication, 30, 209-235.
3. Besley, J.C., & McComas, K.A. (2005). Framing justice: Using the concept of procedural justice to advance political communication research. Communication Theory, 15, 414-436.
4. Besley, J.C., McComas, K.A., & Trumbo, C.W. (2008). Local newspaper coverage of health authority fairness during cancer cluster investigations. Science Communication, 29, 498-521.
5. Besley, J.C., McComas, K.A., & Waks, L. (2006). Media use and the perceived justice of local science authorities. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 801-818.
6. Besley, J.C., & Shanahan, J. (2005). Media attention and exposure in relation to support for agricultural biotechnology. Science Communication, 26, 347-367.
7. Bickerstaff, K., Lorenzoni, I., Pidgeon, N.F., Poortinga, W., & Simmons, P. (2008). Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: Nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 145-169.
8. Bolsen, T., & Cook, F.L. (2008). The polls-trends: Public opinion on energy policy: 1974-2006. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 364-388.
9. Burkhalter, S., Gastil, J., & Kelshaw, T. (2002). A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Communication Theory, 12, 398-422.
10. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Colquitt, J.A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
12. Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C., & Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
13. Colquitt, J.A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C.P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 3-58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Colquitt, J.A., & Shaw, J.C. (2005). How should organizational justice be measured? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 113-152). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Darke, P.R., & Chaiken, S. (2005). The pursuit of self-interest: Self-interest bias in attitude judgment and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 864-883.
16. Delli Carpini, M.X. (2004). Mediating democratic engagement: The impact of communications and citizens' involvement in political and civic life. In L. Lee Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 395-434). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Delli Carpini, M.X., Cook, F.L., & Jacobs, L.R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315-344.
18. DeVellis, R.F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Earle, T.C., & Siegrist, M. (2006). Morality information, performance information, and the distinction between trust and confidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 383-416.
20. Earle, T.C., & Siegrist, M. (2008). On the relation between trust and fairness in environmental risk management. Risk Analysis, 28, 1395-1413.
21. Earle, T.C., Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2007). Trust, risk perception and the TCC model of cooperation. In M. Siegrist, T. C. Earle, & H. Gutscher (Eds.), Trust in cooperative risk management: Uncertainty and scepticism in the public mind (pp. 1-50). London: Earthscan.
22. Fishkin, J.S. (1997). The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23. Gamson, W.A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1-37.
24. Gangl, A. (2003). Procedural justice theory and evaluations of the lawmaking process. Political Behavior, 25, 119-149.
25. Gastil, J., & Levine, P. (2005). The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Hibbing, J.R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (1995). Congress as public enemy: Public attitudes toward American political institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Hibbing, J.R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2001). Process preferences and American politics: What the people want government to be. American Political Science Review, 95, 145-153.
28. Hibbing, J.R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans' beliefs about how government should work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Holbert, R.L., Kwak, N., & Shah, D.V. (2003). Environmental concern, patterns of television viewing, and pro-environmental behaviors: Integrating models of media consumption and effects. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 177-196.
30. Kasperson, J.X., Kasperson, R.E., Perkins, B.J., Renn, O., & White, A.L. (2005). Media risk signals and the proposed Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository: 1985-1989. In J. X. Kasperson & R. E. Kasperson (Eds.), The social contours of risk: Publics, risk communication, and the social amplification of risk (pp. 133-160). London: Earthscan.
31. Landler, M. (2007, January 28). With apologies, nuclear power gets a second look. The New York Times, p. A3.
32. Lee, C.J., Scheufele, D.A., & Lewenstein, B.V. (2005). Public attitudes toward emerging technologies: Examining the interactive effects of cognitions and affect on public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Science Communication, 27, 240-267.
33. McComas, K.A., Arvai, J.L., & Besley, J.C. (2008). Linking public participation and decision making through risk communication. In R. L. Heath & D. H. O'Hair (Eds.), Handbook of crisis and risk communication (pp. 364-385). New York: Routledge.
34. McComas, K.A., Besley, J.C., & Trumbo, C.W. (2006). Why citizens do and don't attend public meetings about possible local cancer clusters. Policy Studies Journal, 34, 671-698.
35. McComas, K.A., Besley, J.C., & Yang, Z. (2008). Risky business: The perceived justice of local scientists and community support for their research. Risk Analysis, 28, 1539-1552.
36. McComas, K.A., & Trumbo, C.W. (2001). Source credibility in environmental health-risk controversies: Application of Meyer's credibility index. Risk Analysis, 21, 467-480.
37. McComas, K.A., Trumbo, C.W., & Besley, J.C. (2007). Public meetings about suspected cancer clusters: The impact of voice, interactional justice, and risk perception on attendees' attitudes in six communities. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 527-549.
38. McLeod, J.M., Scheufele, D.A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16, 315-336.
39. Metlay, D. (1999). Institutional trust and confidence: A journey into a conceptual quagmire. In G. CVetkovich & R. E. Lofstedt (Eds.), Social trust and the management of risk (pp. 100-161, 180-181). London: Earthscan.
40. Miller, D.T. (1999). The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist, 54, 1053-1060.
41. Moy, P., & Pfau, M. (2000). With malice toward all? The media and public confidence in democratic institutions. Westport, CT: Praeger.
42. Mufson, S. (2007, July 31). Firm applies to expand nuclear plant in Maryland. The Washington Post, p. A1.
43. Nisbet, M.C., Scheufele, D.A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B.V. (2002). Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology. Communication Research, 29, 584-608.
44. Page, B.I. (1996). Who deliberates? Mass media in modern democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46. Pidgeon, N.F., Lorenzoni, I., & Poortinga, W. (2008). Climate change or nuclear power-No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 18(1), 69-85.
47. Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N.F. (2003). Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis, 23, 961-972.
48. Public Service Commission of South Carolina. (2008). Combined application of South Carolina Electric and Gas Company for a certificate of environmental compatibility and public convenience and necessity and for a base load review order for the construction and operation of a nuclear facility in Jenkinsville, South Carolina (Docket 2008-196-E). Retrieved August 25, 2008, from http://dms.psc.sc.gov/dockets/dockets.cfc?Method=DocketDetail&DocketID=103552.
49. Rasinski, K.A., Tyler, T.R., & Fridkin, K. (1985). Exploring the function of legitimacy: Mediating effects of personal and institutional legitimacy on leadership endorsement and system support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 386-394.
50. Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51. Renn, O., Webler, T., & Wiedemann, P.M. (1995). Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
52. Rowe, G., & Frewer, L.J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 30, 251-290.
53. Ryfe, D.M. (2002). The practice of deliberative democracy: A study of 16 deliberative organizations. Political Communication, 19, 359-377.
54. Scana. (2009). SCE&G's new nuclear plans approved by Public Service Commission of South Carolina. Retrieved February 17, 2009, from http://www.scana.com/en/investor-relations/news-releases/sceg-new-nuclear-plans-approved-by-psc.htm.
55. Scheufele, D.A. (2000). Talk or conversation? Dimensions of interpersonal discussion and their implications for participatory democracy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 727-743.
56. Shah, D.V. (1998). Civic engagement, interpersonal trust, and television use: An individual-level assessment of social capital. Political Psychology, 19, 469-496.
57. Shah, D.V., McLeod, D.M., Kosicki, G.M., & Mcleod, J.M. (2008). Media and civic participation: On understanding and misunderstanding communication effects. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 207-227). New York: Routledge.
58. Siegrist, M., Earle, T.C., & Gutscher, H. (2003). Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (EMF) risks. Risk Analysis, 23, 705-716.
59. Sjoberg, L. (2003). Attitudes and risk perceptions of stakeholders in a nuclear waste siting issue. Risk Analysis, 23, 739-749.
60. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-285.
61. Slovic, P. (1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19, 689-701. (Reprinted from Environment, ethics, and behavior: The psychology of environmental valuation, pp. 277-313, by M. H. Bazerman, D. M. Messick, A. Tenbrunsel, & K. A. Wade-Benzoni, Eds., 1997, San Francisco, New Lexington Press).
62. Smith, T.W. (1999). The delegates experience. In M. McCombs & A. Reynolds (Eds.), The poll with a human face: The national issues convention experiment in political communication (pp. 39-58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63. Southwell, B.G., & Torres, A. (2006). Connecting interpersonal and mass communication: Science news exposure, perceived ability to understand science, and conversation. Communication Monographs, 73, 334-350.
64. Thibaut, J.W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
65. Tyler, T.R. (1986). Justice and leadership endorsement. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition (pp. 257-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66. Tyler, T.R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
67. Tyler, T.R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
68. Tyler, T.R., & Blader, S.L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349-361.
69. Tyler, T.R., Boeckmann, R.J., Smith, H.J., & Huo, Y.J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview.
70. Tyler, T.R., Casper, J.D., & Fisher, B. (1989). Maintaining allegiance toward political authorities: The role of prior attitudes and the use of fair procedures. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 629-652.
71. Tyler, T.R., & Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social Identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 482-497.
72. Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York: Academic Press.
73. Tyler, T.R., & McGraw, K.M. (1986). Ideology and the interpretation of personal experience: Procedural justice and political quiescence. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 115-128.
74. Tyler, T.R., Rasinski, K.A., & Griffin, E. (1986). Alternative images of the citizen: Implications for public-policy. American Psychologist, 41, 970-978.
75. Tyler, T.R., Rasinski, K.A., & McGraw, K.M. (1985). The influence of perceived Injustice on the endorsement of political leaders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 700-725.
76. U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). American factfinder. Retrieved February 17, 2009, from http://factfinder.census.gov.
77. van den Bos, K. (2005). What is responsible for the fair process effect? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 273-300). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
78. van den Bos, K., & Lind, E.A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 1-60). New York: Academic Press.
79. van den Bos, K., & Miedema, J. (2000). Toward understanding why fairness matters: The influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 355-366.
80. Verba, S., Burns, N., & Schlozman, K.L. (1997). Knowing and caring about politics: Gender and political engagement. Journal of Politics, 59, 1051-1072.