Predictors of driving ability following stroke: A systematic review

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 98-114

  Marshall, Shawn C ^a   Molnar, Frank ^b   Man Son Hing, Malcolm ^b   Blair, Richard ^c   Brosseau, Lucie ^a   Finestone, Hillel M ^a,c,d   Lamothe, Catherine ^a   Korner Bitensky, Nicol ^e   Wilson, Keith G ^a,f,g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c BRUYÈRE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^d Rehabilitation Center   (Canada)

^e MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^f Rehabilitation Centre   (Canada)

^g OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Driving; Predictors; Stroke; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; DATA BASE; DRIVING ABILITY; EVALUATION; FITNESS; HUMAN; NEWCASTLE OTTAWA QUALITY ASSESSMENT SCALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; RATING SCALE; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; REY OSTERREITH COMPLEX FIGURE DESIGN; SCREENING TEST; STROKE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; USEFUL FIELD OF VIEW TEST;

EID: 33847683973     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1401-98     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Fisk GD, Owsley C, Mennemeier M. Vision, attention, and self-reported driving behaviors in community-dwelling stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(4):469-477.
2. Fisk GD, Owsley C, Pulley LV. Driving after stroke: driving exposure, advice, and evaluations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(12):1338-1345.
3. French D, Hanson CS. Survey of driver rehabilitation programs. Am J Occup Ther. 1999;53(4):394-397.
4. Driving and Parkinson's disease. Lancet. 1990;336(8718):781.
5. Akinwuntan AE, DeWeerdt W, Feys H, Baten G, Amo P, Kiekens C. The validity of a road test after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:421-426.
6. Galski T, Ehle HT, Bruno RL. An assessment of measures to predict the outcome of driving evaluations in patients with cerebral damage. Am J Occup Ther. 1990;44(8):709-713.
7. Galski T, Bruno RL, Ehle HT. Driving after cerebral damage: a model with implications for evaluation. Am J Occup Ther. 1992;46(4):324-332.
8. Galski T, Bruno RL, Ehle HT. Prediction of behind-the-wheel driving performance in patients with cerebral brain damage: a discriminant function analysis. Am J Occup Ther. 1993;47(5):391-396.
9. Nouri FM, Lincoln NB. Predicting driving performance after stroke. BMJ. 1993;307(6902):482-483.
10. Akinwuntan AE, Feys H, DeWeerdt W, Pauwels J, Baten G, Strypstein E. Determinants of driving after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(3):334-341.
11. Sundet K, Goffeng L, Hofft E. To drive or not to drive: neuropsychological assessment for driver's license among stroke patients. Scand J Psychol. 1995;36(1):47-58.
12. Mazer BL, Korner-Bitensky NA, Sofer S. Predicting ability to drive after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(7):74 3-750.
13. Jones R, Giddens H, Croft D. Assessment and training of brain-damaged drivers. Am J Occup Ther. 1983;37(11):754-760.
14. Korner-Bitensky NA, Mazer BL, Sofer S, et al. Visual testing for readiness to drive after stroke: a multicenter study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79(3):253-259.
15. Lundberg C, Caneman G, Samuelsson SM, Hakamies-Blomqvist L, Almkvist O. The assessment of fitness to drive after a stroke: the Nordic Stroke Driver Screening Assessment. Scand J Psychol. 2003;44(1):23-30.
16. Daigneault G, Joly P, Frigon JY. Executive functions in the evaluation of accident risk of older drivers. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002;24(2):221-238.
17. Royall DR, Mahurin RK, Gray KF. Bedside assessment of executive cognitive impairment: the executive interview. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40(12):1221-1226.
18. Klavora P, Young M, Heslegrave RJ. A review of a major driver rehabilitation centre: a ten-year client profile. Can J Occup Ther. 2000;67(2):128-134.
19. Michon JA. Dealing with Danger. Summary Report of a Workshop in the Traffic Research Centre. The Netherlands: Groningen; 1979.
20. Simms B. Perception and driving: theory and practice. Br J Occup Ther. 1985;48(12):363-366.
21. Mulrow CD. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994;309(6954):597-599.
22. Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.2.0. Issue 2 ed. Oxford: The Cochrane Library; 2003.
23. Radford KA, Lincoln NB. Concurrent validity of the stroke drivers screening assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:324-328.
24. The Cochrane Library. www. cochrane.org. 2005.
25. Kashyap S, Moher D, Fung MF, Rosenwaks Z. Assisted reproductive technology and the incidence of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(4):785-794.
26. Mazer BL, Sofer S, Korner-Bitensky N, Gelinas I, Hanley J, Wood-Dauphinee S. Effectiveness of a visual attention retraining program on the driving performance of clients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(4):541-550.
27. Klavora P, Gaskovski P, Martin K, et al. The effects of Dynavision rehabilitation on benind-the-wheel driving ability and selected psychomotor abilities of persons after stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 1995;49(6):534-542.
28. Schanke AK, Sundet K. Comprehensive driving assessment: neuropsychological testing and on-road evaluation of brain injured patients. Scand J Psychol. 2000;41(2):113-121.
29. Golper LA, Rau MT, Marshall RC. Aphasic adults and their decisions on driving: an evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980;61(1):34-40.
30. Nouri FM, Lincoln NB. Validation of a cognitive assessment: predicting driving performance after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1992;6:275-281.
31. Reitan RM. Trail Making Test: Manual for Administration and Scoring. Tucson, AZ: Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory; 1986.
32. Rey A. Le test de copie figure complexe. Paris: Editions centre de psychologie appliqué; 1959.
33. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6-18.
34. Lee HC, Lee AH, Cameron D. Validation of a driving simulator by measuring the visual attention skill of older adult drivers. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57(3):324-328.
35. Marottoli RA, de Leon CFM, Glass TA, Williams CS, Cooney LM, Jr., Berkman LF. Consequences of driving cessation: decreased out-of-home activity levels. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2000;55(6):S334-S340.
36. Nouri FM, Tinson DJ, Lincoln NB. Cognitive ability and driving after stroke. Int Disabil Stud. 1987;9(3):110-115.
37. Legh-Smith J, Wade DT, Hewer RL. Driving after a stroke. J Royal Soc Med. 1986;79(April):200-203.
38. Canadian Medical Association. Physicians Guide to Driver Examination. 5th ed. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Medical Association; 1991.
39. American Medical Association. Physician's Guide to Assessing and Counselling Older Drivers. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, National Highway Traffic Safety; 2003.
40. Williams, Graham JD. Are older motorists a menace? Consumers Res. 1995;18-22.
41. Colarusso RP, Hammill DD. Motor Free Visual Perception Test Revised. San Fafael, CA: Academic Therapy Publications; 1996.
42. Owsley C, Ball K. Assessing visual function in the older driver. Clin Geriatr Med. 1993;9(2):389-401.
43. Trankle U, Gelau C, Metker T. Risk perception and age-specific accidents of young drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 1990;22(2):119-125.
44. Ulleberg P, Rundmo T. Risk-taking attitudes among young drivers: the psychometric qualities and dimensionality of an instrument to measure young drivers' risk-taking attitudes. Scand J Psychol. 2002;43(3):227-237.
45. Croft D, Jones RD. The value of off-road tests in the assessment of driving potential of unlicensed disabled people. Br J Occup Ther. 1987;50:357-361.
46. ManSon-Hing M, Marshall SC, Molnar FJ, Wilson KG, Crowder C, Chambers LW. A Canadian research strategy for older drivers: the CanDRIVE program. Geriatr Today. 2004;7:86-92.
47. Kumar R, Powell B, Tani N, Naliboff B, Metter EJ. Perceptual dysfunction in hemiplegia and automobile driving. Gerontologist. 1991;31(6):807-810.
48. van Zomeren AH, Brouwer WH, Minderhoud JM. Acquired brain damage and driving: a review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68(10):697-705.