High-throughput screening of chemical exchange saturation transfer MR contrast agents

Contrast Media and Molecular Imaging

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 162-170

  Liu, Guanshu ^a,b   Gilad, Assaf A ^a,b   Bulte, Jeff W M ^a,b   Van Zijl, Peter C M ^a,b   McMahon, Michael T ^a,b  

^a KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

B0 correction; CEST; High throughput; MRI

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL EXCHANGE SATURATION TRANSFER AGENT; LIPOSOME; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AGENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL EXCHANGE SATURATION TRANSFER IMAGING; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; LIQUID; MAGNETIC FIELD; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

CONTRAST MEDIA; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PEPTIDES; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 77954567160     PISSN: 15554309     EISSN: 15554317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cmmi.383     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ward KM, Aletras AH, Balaban RS. A new class of contrast agents for MRI based on proton chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST). J Magn Reson 2000; 143(1): 79-87.
2. Sherry AD, Woods M. Chemical exchange saturation transfer contrast agents for magnetic resononance imaging. Annu Rev Biomed Engng 2008; 10: 391-411.
3. Zhou J, van Zijl PC. Chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging and spectroscopy. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 2006; 48: 109-136. (Pubitemid 44236131)
4. Aime S, Barge A, Delli Castelli D, Fedeli F, Mortillaro A, Nielsen FU, Terreno E. Paramagnetic lanthanide(III) complexes as pH-sensitive chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) contrast agents for MRI applications. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47(4): 639-648.
5. Vinogradov E, He H, Lubag A, Balschi JA, Sherry AD, Lenkinski RE. MRI detection of paramagnetic chemical exchange effects in mice kidneys in vivo. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58(4): 650-655.
6. McMahon MT, Gilad AA, Zhou J, Sun PZ, Bulte JW, van Zijl PC. Quantifying exchange rates in chemical exchange saturation transfer agents using the saturation time and saturation power dependencies of the magnetization transfer effect on the magnetic resonance imaging signal (QUEST and QUESP): Ph calibration for poly-L-lysine and a starburst dendrimer. Magn Reson Med 2006; 55(4): 836-847.
7. Ling W, Regatte R, Navon G, Jerschow A. Assessment of glycosaminoglycan concentration in vivo by chemical exchange-dependent saturation transfer (gagCEST). Proc Natl Acad Sci 2008; 105(7): 2266.
8. Terreno E, Delli Castelli D, Violante E, Sanders HMHF, Sommerdijk NAJM, Aime S. Osmotically shrunken LIPOCEST agents: an innovative class of magnetic resonance imaging contrast media based on chemical exchange saturation transfer. Chemistry - a European Journal 2009; 15(6): 1440-1448.
9. Zhang S, Merritt M, Woessner DE, Lenkinski RE, Sherry AD. PARACEST agents: modulating MRI contrast via water proton exchange. Acc Chem Res 2003; 36: 783-790.
10. Schroder L, Lowery TJ, Hilty C, Wemmer DE, Pines A. Molecular imaging using a targeted magnetic resonance hyperpolarized biosensor. Science 2006; 314(5798): 446-449. (Pubitemid 44628961)
11. Aime S, Carrera C, Delli Castelli D, Geninatti Crich S, Terreno E. Tunable imaging of cells labeled with MRI-PARACEST agents. Angew Chem Int Ed 2005; 44: 1813-1815.
12. Gilad AA, McMahon MT, Walczak P, Winnard PT Jr, Raman V, van Laarhoven HW, Skoglund CM, Bulte JW, van Zijl PC. Artificial reporter gene providing MRI contrast based on proton exchange. Nat Biotechnol 2007; 25(2): 217-219.
13. Zhou J, Lal B, Wilson DA, Laterra J, van Zijl PC. Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50(6): 1120-1126.
14. Sun P, Zhou J, SunW, Huang J, van Zijl P. Detection of the ischemic penumbra using pH-weighted MRI. J Cerebral Blood Flow Metab 2006; 27(6): 1129-1136.
15. 3+-DOTAM-glycine (Gly)-phenylalanine (Phe). Magn Reson Med 2008; 59(2): 374-381.
16. Zhang S, Trokowski R, Sherry AD. A paramagnetic CEST agent for imaging glucose by MRI. J Am Chem Soc 2003; 125(50): 15288-15289.
17. Liu G, Li Y, Pagel MD. Design and characterization of a new irreversible responsive PARACEST MRI contrast agent that detects nitric oxide. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58(6): 1249-1256.
18. Huang C, Morrow J. A PARACEST agent responsive to inner-and outer-sphere phosphate ester interactions for MRI applications. J Am Chem Soc 2009; 131(12): 4206-4207.
19. Castelli DD, Terreno E, Cabella C, Chaabane L, Lanzardo S, Tei L, Visigalli M, Aime S. Evidence for in vivo macrophage mediated tumor uptake of paramagnetic/fluorescent liposomes. NMR Biomed 2009; 22(10): 1084-1092.
20. 19F contrast agent for MR image-guided drug delivery. J Am Chem Soc 2009; 131(4): 1380-1381.
21. Yoo B, Pagel MD. A PARACEST MRI contrast agent to detect enzyme activity. J Am Chem Soc 2006; 128(43): 14032-14033.
22. Chauvin T, Durand P, Bernier M, Meudal H, Doan B, Noury F, Badet B, Beloeil J, Toth E. Detection of enzymatic activity by PARACEST MRI: a general approach to target a large variety of enzymes. Angew Chem Int Ed 2008; 47(23): 4370.
23. McMahon MT, Gilad AA, DeLiso MA, Berman SM, Bulte JW, van Zijl PC. New 'multicolor' polypeptide diamagnetic chemical exchange saturation transfer (DIACEST) contrast agents for MRI. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60(4): 803-8812.
24. Gilad AA, van Laarhoven HW, McMahon MT, Walczak P, Heerschap A, Neeman M, van Zijl PC, Bulte JW. Feasibility of concurrent dual contrast enhancement using CEST contrast agents and super-paramagnetic iron oxide particles. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61(4): 970-974.
25. Aime S, Castelli DD, Lawson D, Terreno E. Gd-loaded liposomes as T1, susceptibility, and CEST agents, all in one. J Am Chem Soc 2007; 129(9): 2430-2431.
26. Bryant R. The dynamics of water-protein interactions. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1996; 25(1): 29-53.
27. Wang H, Ciobanu L, Edison AS, Webb AG. An eight-coil high-frequency probehead design for high-throughput nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Magn Reson 2004; 170(2): 206-212.
28. MacNamara E, Hou T, Fisher G, Williams S, Raftery D. Multiplex sample NMR: an approach to high-throughput NMR using a parallel coil probe. Anal Chim Acta 1999; 397(1-3): 9-16.
29. Banas EM. 'Multi-cloistered' NMR cells. Appl Spectrosc 1969; 23: 281.
30. Reetz MT, Tielmann P, Eipper A, Ross A, Schlotterbeck G. A high-throughput NMR-based ee-assay using chemical shift imaging. Chem Commun 2004; (12): 1366-1367.
31. Perez JM, Josephson L, O'Loughlin T, Hogemann D, Weissleder R. Magnetic relaxation switches capable of sensing molecular interactions. Nat Biotechnol 2002; 20(8): 816-820.
32. Ross A, Schlotterbeck G, Senn H, von Kienlin M. Application of chemical shift imaging for simultaneous and fast acquisition of NMR spectra on multiple samples. Angew Chem Int Ed 2001; 40(17): 3243-3245.
33. Olson DL, Peck TL, Webb AG, Magin RL, Sweedler JV. High-resolution microcoil H-1-NMR for mass-limited, nanoliter-volume samples. Science 1995; 270(5244): 1967-1970.
34. Jones C, Schlosser M, van Zijl P, Pomper M, Golay X, Zhou J. Amide proton transfer imaging of human brain tumors at 3 T. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56(3): 585.
35. Kim M, Gillen J, Landman BA, Zhou J, van Zijl PCM. Water saturation shift referencing (WASSR) for chemical exchange saturation transfer experiments. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61(6): 1441-1450.
36. Stancanello J, Terreno E, Castelli D, Cabella C, Uggeri F, Aime S. Development and validation of a smoothing-splines-based correction method for improving the analysis of CEST-MR images. Contrast Media Mol Imag 2008; 3(4): 136.
37. Sun PZ, Farrar CT, Sorensen AG. Correction for artifacts induced by B(0) and B(1) field inhomogeneities in pH-sensitive chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58(6): 1207-1215.
38. Webb P, Spielman D, Macovski A. Inhomogeneity correction for in vivo spectroscopy by high-resolution water referencing. Magn Reson Med 1992; 23(1): 1-11.
39. Woessner DE, Zhang S, Merritt ME, Sherry AD. Numerical solution of the Bloch equations provides insights into the optimum design of PARACEST agents for MRI. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53(4): 790-799.
40. Henkelman R, Stanisz G, Graham S. Magnetization transfer in MRI: a review. NMR Biomed 2001; 14(2): 57-64.
41. f and relaxation terms - application to saturation and slice selection. Med Phys 1993; 20(1): 5-13.