A more precise characterization of chaperonin substrates

Bioinformatics

Volumn 26, Issue 14, 2010, Pages 1685-1689

  Raineri, Emanuele ^a,b   Ribeca, Paolo ^a,b   Serrano, Luis ^b   Maier, Tobias ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b CENTRE FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN; PROTEOME;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; KINETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PROTEIN FOLDING;

CHAPERONIN 60; CHAPERONINS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; KINETICS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEOME;

EID: 77954502545     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq287     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Altschuler,G. and Willison,K. (2008) Development of free-energy-based models for chaperonin containing TCP-1 mediated folding of actin. J. R. Soc. Interface, 5, 1391-1408.
2. Bloom,J. et al. (2006) Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast. Mol. Biol. Evol., 23, 1751-1761.
3. Chapman,E. et al. (2006) Global aggregation of newly translated proteins in an Escherichia coli strain deficient of the chaperonin GroEL. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 15800-15805.
4. Corbin,R. et al. (2003) Toward a protein profile of Escherichia coli: comparison to its transcription profile. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 9232-9237.
5. Edgar,R. (2004) MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics, 5, 113.
6. Fares,M. et al. (2002) Endosymbiotic bacteria: GroEL buffers against deleterious mutations. Nature, 417, 398.
7. Fenton,W. and Horwich,A. (1997) GroEL-mediated protein folding. Protein Sci., 6, 743-760.
8. Fernandez-Escamilla,A. et al. (2004) Prediction of sequence-dependent and mutational effects on the aggregation of peptides and proteins. Nat. Biotechnol., 22, 1302-1306.
9. Gevaert,K. et al. (2002) Chromatographic isolation of methionine-containing peptides for gel-free proteome analysis: identification of more than 800 Escherichia coli proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 1, 896-903.
10. Hartl,F. and Hayer-Hartl,M. (2002) Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: from nascent chain to folded protein. Science, 295, 1852-1858.
11. Ishihama,Y. et al. (2008) Protein abundance profiling of the Escherichia coli cytos. BMC Genomics, 9, 102.
12. Kanehisa,M. and Goto,S. (2000) KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 27-30.
13. Kerner,M. et al. (2005) Proteome-wide analysis of chaperonin-dependent protein folding in Escherichia coli. Cell, 122, 209-220.
14. Kyte,J. and Doolittle,R. (1982) A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol., 157, 105-132.
15. Niwa,T. et al. (2009) Bimodal protein solubility distribution revealed by an aggregation analysis of the entire ensemble of Escherichia coli proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 4201-4206.
16. Noivirt-Brik,O. et al. (2005) Low folding propensity and high translation efficiency distinguish in vivo substrates of GroEL from other Escherichia coli proteins. Bioinformatics, 23, 3276-3279.
17. Onuchic,J. and Wolynes,P. (2004) Theory of protein folding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 14, 70-75.
18. Prilusky,J. et al. (2005) Foldindex: a simple tool to predict whether a given protein sequence is intrinsically unfolded. Bioinformatics, 21, 3435-3438.
19. Rice,P. et al. (2000) EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet., 16, 276-277.
20. Sakikawa,C. et al. (1999) On the maximum size of proteins to stay and fold in the cavity of GroEL underneathGroES. J. Biol. Chem., 274, 21251-21256.
21. Sangster,T. et al. (2004) Causes, effects and implications of Hsp90-mediated genetic capacitance. Bioessays, 26, 348-362.
22. Specchia,V. et al. (2010) Hsp90 prevents phenotypic variation by suppressing the mutagenic activity of transposons. Nature, 463, 662-665.
23. Stan,G. et al. (2006) Residues in substrate proteins that interact with GroEL in the capture process are buried in the native state. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 4433-4438.
24. Tokuriki,N. and Tawfik,D. (2009) Chaperonin overexpression promotes genetic variation and enzyme evolution. Nature, 459, 668-673.
25. Tokuriki, N. et al. (2007) The stability effects of protein mutations appear to be universally distributed. J. Mol. Biol., 269, 1318-1332.
26. Tomala,K. and Korona,R. (2008) Molecular chaperones and selection against mutations. Biol. Direct, 26, 3-5.
27. Weissman,J. et al. (1994) GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms. Cell, 78, 693-702.
28. Xu,Z. et al. (1997) The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature, 388, 741-750.
29. Yang,Z. and Nielsen,R. (2000) Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evol., 17, 32-43.
30. Yang,Z. (2007) PAML4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol., 24, 1586-1591.