Words as windows to thought: The case of object representation

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 195-200

  Barner, David ^a   Li, Peggy ^b   Snedeker, Jesse ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Count nouns; Language and thought; Mass nouns; Number; Object perception; Singular plural; Whorfian hypothesis

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954490758     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963721410370294     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Whorf, B.L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (J.B. Carroll, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. A historical classic-one of the first important investigations of language and thought.
2. Gentner, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2001). Individuation, relativity and early word learning. In M. Bowerman & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 215-256). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. A modern classic that discusses early noun learning across different languages and that argues for Whorfian effects.
3. Gleitman, L., & Papafragou, A. (2005). Language and thought. In K. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 633-661). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. A recent review of the language and thought literature, from a non-Whorfian perspective.
4. Barner, D., Inagaki, S., & Li, P. (2009). Language, thought, and real nouns. Cognition, 111, 329-344.
5. Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2005). Quantity judgment and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition, 97, 41-66.
6. Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2006). Children's early understanding of mass-count syntax: Individuations, lexical content, and the number asymmetry hypothesis. Language Learning and Development, 2, 163-194.
7. Barner, D., Thalwitz, D., Wood, J., Yang, S., & Carey, S. (2007). On the relation between the acquisition of singular-plural morphosyntax and the conceptual distinction between one and more than one. Developmental Science, 10, 365-373.
8. Barner, D., Wagner, L., & Snedeker, J. (2008). Events and the ontology of individuals: Verbs as a source of individuating mass and count nouns. Cognition, 106, 805-832.
9. Bowerman, M. (1996). Learning how to structure space for language: A cross-linguistic perspective. In P. Bloom, M.A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M.F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 385- 436). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Colunga, E., & Smith, L.B. (2005). From the Lexicon to Expectations About Kinds: A Role for Associative Learning. Psychological Review, 112, 347-382.
11. Feigenson, L., & Carey, S. (2003). Tracking individuals via object-files: Evidence from infants' manual search. Developmental Science, 6, 568-584.
12. Frank, M.C., Everett, D.L., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2008). Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Piraha language and cognition. Cognition, 108, 819-824.
13. Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Imai, M., & Gentner, D. (1997). A crosslinguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition, 62, 169-200.
15. Iwasaki, N., Vinson, D., & Vigliocco, G. (in press). Does the grammatical count/mass distinction affect semantic representations? Evidence from experiments in English and Japanese. Language and Cognitive Processes.
16. Kay, P., & Regier, T. (2006). Language, thought, and color: Recent developments. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 51-54.
17. Li, P., Dunham, Y., & Carey, S. (2009). Of substance: The nature of language effects on construal. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 487-524.
18. Li, P., Ogura, T., Barner, D., Yang, S.-J., & Carey, S. (2009). Does the distinction between singular and plural sets depend on language? Developmental Psychology, 45, 1644-1653.
19. Lucy, J. (1992). Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20. Malt, B., Sloman, S., Gennari, S., Shi, M., & Wang, Y. (1999). Knowing versus naming: Similarity and linguistic categorization of artifacts. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 230-262.
21. Pelletier, F. (Ed.). (2009). Kinds, things, and stuff: Concepts of generics and mass terms (New Directions in Cognitive Science, Vol. 12). New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Roberson, D., Hanley, J., & Pak, H. (2009). Thresholds for color discrimination in English and Korean speakers. Cognition, 112, 482-487.
23. Samuelson, L., & Smith, L. (1999). Early noun vocabularies: Do ontology, category structure, and syntax correspond? Cognition, 73, 1-33.
24. Quine, W.V.O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Whorf, B. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.