Does the grammatical count/mass distinction affect semantic representations? Evidence from experiments in English and Japanese

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 189-223

  Iwasaki, Noriko ^a   Vinson, David P ^b   Vigliocco, Gabriella ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Count mass nouns; Linguistic relativity; Semantic similarity; Speech errors

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; FEMALE; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JAPANESE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH AND LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORY VALIDATION; VERBALIZATION;

EID: 77951247091     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960902978517     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Allan, K. (1980). Nouns and countability. Language, 56, 541-567.
2. Amano, S., & Kondo, T. (Eds.). (2003). NTT Database CD-ROMs. Nihongo-no goitokusei. (Lexical properties of Japanese). Vol. 1-7, Tokyo: Sanseido.
3. Athanasopoulos, P. (2006). Effects of the grammatical representation of number on cognition in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(1), 89-96.
4. Bloom, P. (1990). Semantic structure and language development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: MIT.
5. Bloom, P. (1994). Syntax-semantics mappings as an explanation for some transitions in language development. In Y. Levy (Ed.), Other children, other languages: Issues in the theory of language acquisition (pp. 41-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
6. Bloom, P., & Keil, F. (2001). Thinking through language. Mind and Language, 16, 351-367.
7. Butler, Y. G. (2002). Second language learners' theories on the use of English articles: An analysis of the metalinguistic knowledge used by Japanese students in acquiring the English article system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 451-480.
8. Conrad, B., & Schousboe, S. (1992). Publications on English themes. Vol. 19, Meaning and English grammar. Department of English, University of Copenhagen.
9. Cook, V., Bassetti, B., Kasai, C., Sasaki, M., & Takahashi, J. A. (2006). Do bilinguals have different concepts? The case of shape and material in Japanese L2 users of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 10(2), 137-152.
10. Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Fisher, C. (1994). Structure and meaning in the verb lexicon: Input for a syntax-aided verb learning procedure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 473-518.
12. Fisher, C., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L.R. (1991). On the semantic content of subcategorization frames. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 331-392.
13. Fisher, C., & Gleitman, L. R. (2002). Language acquisition. In H. F. Pashler (Series Ed.) & C. R. Gallistel (Volume Ed.), Steven's Handbook of Experimental Psychology: Vol. 1. Learning and motivation (pp. 445-496). New York: Wiley.
14. Fromkin, V. A. (1973). Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
15. Garrard, P., Carroll, E., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2004). Dissociation of lexical syntax and semantics: Evidence from focal cortical degeneration. Neurocase, 10, 353-362.
16. Garrett, M. F. (1984). The organization of processing structure for language production: Application to aphasic speech. In D. Caplan, A. R. Lecours, & A. Smith (Eds.), Biological perspectives on language (pp. 172-193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Garrett, M. F. (1992). Lexical retrieval processes: Semantic field effects. In E. Kittay & A. Lehrer (Eds.), Frames, fields and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp. 377-395). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
18. Gleason, H. A. (1961). An introduction to descriptive linguistics. Revised version. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
19. Gleitman, L. R., Cassidy, K., Nappa, R., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2005). Hard words. Language Learning and Development, 1, 23-64.
20. Grimshaw, J. (1981). Form, function, and the language acquisition device. In C. L. Baker & J. J. McCarthy (Eds.), The logical problem of language acquisition (pp. 165-182). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Imai, M., & Gentner, D. (1997). A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition, 62, 169-200.
22. Imai, M., & Mazuka, R. (2003). Reevaluating linguistic relativity: Language-specific categories and the role of universal ontological knowledge in the construal of individuation. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 429-464). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Imai, M., & Mazuka, R. (2007). Language-relative construal of individuation constrained by universal ontology: Revisiting language universals and linguistic relativity. Cognitive Science, 31(3), 385-414.
24. Kay, G. (1995). English loanwords in Japanese. World Englishes, 14(1), 67-76.
25. Kousta, S.-T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2008). Investigating linguistic relativity through bilingualism: The case of grammatical gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory and Cognition, 34, 843-858.
26. Landau, B., & Gleitman, L. (1985). Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
28. Lucy, J. A. (1992). Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the Linguistic Relativity hypothesis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Lucy, J. A., & Gaskins, S. (2001). Grammatical categories and the development of classification preferences: a comparative approach. In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 257-283). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Master, P. (1987). A cross-linguistic interlanguage analysis of the acquisition of the English article system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
31. Matsumoto, Y. (1988). The Japanese classifiers -ken and -mune: Prototype and background of existence. Sophia Linguistica, 23/24, 19-29.
32. Matsumoto, Y. (1993). Japanese numeral classifiers: A study of semantic categories and lexical organization. Linguistics, 31, 667-713.
33. Mazuka, R., & Friedman, R. S. (2000). Linguistic relativity in Japanese and English: Is language the primary determinant in object classification? Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 9, 353-377.
34. McCawley, J. D. (1975). Lexicography and the count/mass distinction. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 314-321.
35. Middleton, E. L., Wisniewski, E. J., Trindel, K. A., & Imai, M. (2004). Separating the chaff from the oats: Evidence for a conceptual distinction between count noun and mass noun aggregates. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 371-394.
36. Mufwene, S. S. (1984). The count/mass distinction and the English lexicon. In D. Testen, V. Mishra, & J. Drogo (Eds.), Papers from parasession on lexical semantics (pp. 200-221). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
37. Murdoch Books (2001). Food: the definitive guide. Sydney: Murdoch Books.
38. Papafragou, A. (2005). Relations between language and thought: Individuation and the count/mass distinction. In C. Lefebvre & H. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
39. Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1972). A grammar of contemporary English (pp. 169-171). New York: Seminar Press.
41. Romney, A. K., Moore, C. C., & Rusch, C. D. (1997). Cultural universals: Measuring the semantic structure of emotion terms in English and Japanese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 94, 5489-5494.
42. Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
43. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime Reference Guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
44. Slobin, D. (1996). From 'thought and language' to 'thinking for speaking. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70-96). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45. Slobin, D. (2000). Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeir & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp. 107-138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
46. Stanlaw, J. (2005). Japanese English: Language and the culture contact. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
47. Steinhauer, K., Pancheva, R., Newman, A. J., Gennari, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2001). How the mass counts: An electrophysiological approach to the processing of lexical features. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 12(5), 999-1005.
48. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Indefrey, P., Levelt, W., & Hellwig, F. (2004a). Role of grammatical gender and semantics in German word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 483-497.
49. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P, Lewis, W., & Garrett, M. F. (2004b). The meanings of object and action words. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 422-488.
50. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Martin, R. C., & Garrett, M. F. (1999). Is 'count' and 'mass' information available when the noun is not? An investigation of tip of the tongue states and anoma. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 534-558.
51. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Paganelli, F., & Dworzynski, K. (2005). Grammatical gender effects on cognition: Implications for language learning and language use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 501-524.
52. Whorf, B. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: selected writing of Benjamin Lee Whorf, J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. Wierzbicka, A. (1983). Oats' and 'wheat': the fallacy of arbitrariness. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Symposium on iconicity in syntax (pp. 311-342). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
54. Wierzbicka, A. (1988). The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
55. Willan, A. (1989). Grande Enciclopedia della cuicina: Tecnich consigli ricette. Milan: RCS Rizzoli Libri S.p.A.
56. Wisniewski, E. J., Lamb, C. A., & Middleton, E. L. (2003). On the conceptual basis for the count and mass noun distinction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 583-624.