Of substance: The nature of language effects on entity construal

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 487-524

  Li, Peggy ^a   Dunham, Yarrow ^b   Carey, Susan ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Classifiers; Count mass; Cross cultural differences; Language; Linguistic relativity; Noun meaning; Object and substance; Ontological categories; Word learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASIAN; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; TAIWAN; UNITED STATES;

ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; BOSTON; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COGNITION; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; TAIWAN; VERBAL LEARNING; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 64449086481     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Allan K. Nouns and countability. Language 56 3 (1980) 541-567
2. Au T.K.-F. Developing an intuitive understanding of substance kinds. Cognitive Psychology 27 1 (1994) 71-111
3. Barner, D., Inagaki, S., & Li., P. (submitted for publication). Language, thought, and real nouns: Individuation in Japanese, English and Mandarin Chinese. Cognition.
4. Barner D., and Snedeker S. Children's early understanding of mass-count syntax: Individuation, lexical content, and the number asymmetry hypothesis. Language Learning and Development 2 (2006) 163-194
5. Bloom P. How children learn the meanings of words (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
6. In: Bowerman M., and Levinson S. (Eds). Language acquisition and conceptual development (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
7. Boroditsky L., Schmidt L., and Phillips W. Sex, syntax, and semantics. In: Gentner D., and Goldin-Meadow S. (Eds). Language in mind: Advances in the issues of language and thought (2003), MIT Press 61-78
8. Burger J., and Prasada S. Quantification of solid and nonsolid entities: The role of perceived arbitrariness of structure. Proceedings of the twenty-first annual Boston University conference on language development (1997), Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA
9. Carey S. Knowledge acquisition: Enrichment or conceptual change?. In: Carey S., and Gelman R. (Eds). The epigenesis of mind: Essays in biology and cognition (1991), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 257-291
10. Carey S. Does learning a language require the child to reconceptualize the world?. Lingua 92 (1994) 143-167
11. Carey, S. (in press). The origin of concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Casasanto D., and Boroditsky L. Do we think about time in terms of space?. Proceedings of the 25th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
13. Chen, F. (2007). A study of language and thought: Object-substance interpretation among the Tsotsil Mayan. Unpublished undergraduate honors thesis at Harvard University.
14. Chierchia G. Syntactic bootstrapping and the acquisition of noun meanings: The mass-count issue. In: Lust B., Suner M., and Whitman J. (Eds). Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectives (1994), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 301-318
15. Chierchia G. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6 (1998) 339-405
16. Colunga E., and Smith L.B. From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: A role for associative learning. Psychological Review 112 2 (2005)
17. Comrie B. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology (1981), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
18. Crane, S. (2003). Effects of grammar on entity construals and word leaning among speakers of English and Czech. Unpublished undergraduate honors thesis at Swarthmore College.
19. Croft W.A. Typology and universals (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
20. Dickinson D.K. Leaning the names for materials: Factors constraining and limiting hypotheses about word meaning. Cognitive Development 3 (1988) 15-35
21. Dunham, Y., Li, P., & Carey, S. (in preperation). Properties influencing object-substance construal.
22. Feigenson L., Dehaene S., and Spelke E.S. Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 7 (2004) 307-314
23. Fenson L., Dale P.S., Reznick J.S., Bates E., Thal D., and Pethick S. Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 59 5 (1994) [Serial # 242]
24. Fisher, C., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Breaking the linguistic code: Current issues in early language learning. In H. F. Pashler (Series Ed.) & R. Gallistel (Vol. Ed.), Steven's handbook of experimental psychology, Vol. 1: Learning and motivation (3rd ed., pp. 445-496). New York: Wiley.
25. Gathercole V.M., and Min H. Word meaning biases or language-specific effects? Evidence from English, Spanish, and Korean. First Language 17 (1997) 31-56
26. Gathercole V.C.M., and Whitfield L.C. Function as a criterion for the extension of new words. Journal of Child Language 28 (2001) 87-125
27. Gentner D., and Boroditsky L. Individuation, relativity, and early word learning. In: Bowerman M., and Levinson S. (Eds). Language acquisition and conceptual development (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 215-256
28. In: Gentner D., and Goldin-Meadow S. (Eds). Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought (2003), MIT Press
29. Gleitman L., and Papafragou A. Language and thought. In: Holyoak K., and Morrison R. (Eds). Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (2005), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 633-661
30. Gordon P. Evaluating the semantic categories hypothesis: The case of count/mass distinction. Cognition 20 (1985) 209-242
31. Gordon P. Count/mass category acquisition: Distributional distinctions in children's speech. Journal of Child Language 15 (1988) 109-128
32. In: Gumperz J., and Levinson S. (Eds). Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (1996), Cambridge University Press, London, UK
33. Haryu E., Imai M., Okada H., Li. L., Meyer M., Hirsh-Pasek K., et al. Noun bias in Chinese children: Novel noun and verb learning in Chinese, Japanese, and English preschoolers. Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual Boston University conference on language development (2005), Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA 272-283
34. Hohenstein J. Language-related motion event similarities in English- and Spanish-speaking children. Journal of Cognition and Development 6 3 (2005) 403-425
35. Huntley-Fenner G., Carey S., and Solimando S. Objects are individuals but stuff doesn't count: Perceived rigidity and cohesiveness influence infants' representations of small groups of discrete entities. Cognition 8 (2002) 2-3-221
36. Imai M., and Gentner D. A crosslinguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition 62 (1997) 169-200
37. Imai M., and Mazuka R. Re-evaluation of linguistic relativity: Language-specific categories and the role of universal ontological knowledge in the construal of individuation. In: Gentner D., and Goldin-Meadow S. (Eds). Language in mind: Advances in the issues of language and thought (2003), MIT Press 430-464
38. Imai M., and Mazuka R. Revisiting language universals and linguistic relativity: Language-relative construal of individuation constrained by universal ontology. Cognitive Science 31 (2007) 385-414
39. Kobayashi H. The influence of adults' actions on children's inferences about word meanings. Japanese Psychological Research 41 (1999) 35-49
40. Lee H. The acquisition of word meaning in Korean: Perceptual properties, ontological categories, and syntactic cues. Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology 11 2 (1997) 107-120
41. Li P., Barner D., and Huang B. Classifiers as count syntax: Individuation and measurement in the acquisition of Mandarin Chinese. Language, Learning, and Development 4 4 (2008) 1-42
42. Li P., and Gleitman L. Turning the tables: Spatial language and spatial cognition. Cognition 83 (2002) 265-294
43. Lucy J. Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis (1992), Cambridge, University Press, Cambridge
44. Lucy, J. (1996). Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis (Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language, No. 13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Lucy J., and Gaskins S. Grammatical categories and the development of classification preferences: A comparative approach. In: Bowerman M., and Levinson S. (Eds). Language acquisition and conceptual development (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 257-283
46. Lucy J.A., and Gaskins S. Interaction of language type and referent type in the development of nonverbal classification preferences. In: Gentner D., and Goldin-Meadow S. (Eds). Language in mind: Advances in the issues of language and thought (2003), MIT, Cambridge, MA 465-492
47. Matsumoto Y. Order of acquisition in the lexicon: Implications from Japanese classifiers. In: Nelson K.E., and van Kleek A. (Eds). Children's language (1987), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 229-260
48. Mazuka R., and Friedman R. Linguistic relativity in Japanese and English: Is language the primary determinant in object classification?. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9 (2000) 353-377
49. Naigles L., and Terrazas P. Motion-verb generalizations in English and Spanish: Influences of language and syntax. Psychological Science 9 (1998) 363-369
50. Naka M. The acquisition of Japanese numerical classifiers by 2-4-year-old children: The role of caretakers' linguistic inputs. Japanese Psychological Research 41 1 (1990) 70-78
51. Papafragou A. Relations between language and thought: Individuation and the count/mass distinction. In: Lefebvre C., and Cohen H. (Eds). Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (2005), Elsevier Science
52. Pinker S. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language (1994), W. Morrow, New York
53. Prasada S. Learning names for solid substances: Quantifying solid entities in terms of portions. Cognitive Development 8 1 (1993) 83-104
54. Prasada S. Names for things and stuff: An Aristotelian perspective. In: Jackendoff R., Bloom P., and Wynn K. (Eds). Language, logic, and concepts (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 119-146
55. Prasada S., Ferenz K., and Haskell T. Conceiving of entities as objects and stuff. Cognition 83 (2002) 141-165
56. Quine W.V.O. Word and object (1960), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
57. Samuelson L.K. Statistical regularities in vocabulary guide language acquisition in connectionist models and 15-20-month-olds. Developmental Psychology 38 (2002) 1016-1037
58. Samuelson L., and Smith L. Early noun vocabularies: Do ontology, category structure and syntax correspond?. Cognition 73 (1999) 1-33
59. Sandhofer C., Smith L., and Luo J. Counting nouns and verbs in the input: Differential frequencies, different kinds of learning?. Journal of Child Language 27 (2000) 561-585
60. Sapir E. Selected writings in culture, language, and personality (1949), University of California Press, Berkeley
61. Slobin D.I. From thought and language" to "thinking to speaking. In: Gumperz J.J., and Levinson S.C. (Eds). Rethinking linguistic relativity (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 70-96
62. Smith C., Carey S., and Wiser M. On differentiation: A case study of the development of the concepts of size, weight and density. Cognition 21 (1985) 177-237
63. Smith L.B., Jones S.S., Landau B., Gershkoff-Stowe L., and Samuelson L.K. Object name learning provides on-the-job training for attention. Psychological Science 13 1 (2002) 13-19
64. Snedeker, J., & Li, P. (2000). Can the situations in which words occur account for cross-linguistic variation in vocabulary composition? In J. Tai, & Y. Chang (Eds.), Proceedings of seventh international symposium on Chinese languages and linguistics.
65. Snedeker, J., Thorpe, K., & Trueswell, J. (2001). On choosing the parse with the scene: The role of visual context and verb bias in ambiguity resolution. In Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 964-969).
66. Soja N.N. Inferences about the meanings of nouns: The relationship between perception and syntax. Cognitive Development 7 (1992) 29-45
67. Soja N., Carey S., and Spelke E. Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms. Cognition 38 (1991) 179-211
68. Spelke E.S., Kestenbaum R., Simons D., and Wein D. Spatiotemporal continuity, smoothness of motion and object identity in infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 13 (1995) 113-142
69. Subrahmanyam K., and Chen H.N. A cross-linguistic study of children's noun learning: The case of object and substance words. First Language 26 2 (2006) 141-160
70. Subrahmanyam K., Landau B., and Gelman R. Shape, material, and syntax: Interacting forces in children's learning in novel words for objects and substances. Language and Cognitive Processes 14 (1999) 249-281
71. Trueswell J.C., and Kim A.E. How to prune a garden-path by nipping it in the bud: Fast-priming of verb argument structures. Journal of Memory and Language 39 (1998) 102-123
72. Uchida N., and Imai M. Heuristics in learning classifiers: The acquisition of the classifier system and its implications for the nature of lexical acquisition. Japanese Psychological Research 41 1 (1999) 50-69
73. Whorf. The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. In: Carroll J.B. (Ed). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (1939-1956), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 134-159
74. Wynn K. Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature 358 (1992) 749-750
75. Xu F., and Carey S. Infants' metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology 30 (1996) 111-153
76. Yamamoto K., and Keil F. The acquisition of Japanese numerical classifiers - Linkage between grammatical forms and conceptual categories. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9 (2000) 379-409
77. Yoshida H., and Smith L. Shifting ontological boundaries: How Japanese- and English-speaking children generalize names for animals and artifacts. Developmental Sciences 6 1 (2003) 1-34
78. Yoshida H., and Smith L. Known and novel noun extensions: Attention at two levels of abstraction. Child Development 74 2 (2003) 564-577