Mapping Subchondral Bone Density of Selected Donor and Recipient Sites for Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation in the Canine Stifle Joint Using Computed Tomographic Osteoabsorptiometry

Veterinary Surgery

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 496-503

  Böttcher, Peter ^a   Zeissler, Markus ^a   Grevel, Vera ^a   Oechtering, Gerhard ^a   Maierl, Johann ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DOG; DOG DISEASE; FEMUR; HINDLIMB; HISTOLOGY; PATELLA; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; TRANSPLANTATION; WEIGHT BEARING; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; DOG DISEASES; VETERINARY;

ANIMALS; BONE DENSITY; DOG DISEASES; DOGS; FEMUR; PATELLA; STIFLE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS; WEIGHT-BEARING;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 77954451873     PISSN: 01613499     EISSN: 1532950X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00674.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Cook JL, Hudson CC, Kuroki K. Autogenous osteochondral grafting for treatment of stifle osteochondrosis in dogs. Vet Surg 2008, 37:311-321.
2. Frank M. Use of osteochondral grafting for therapy of osteochondrosis dissecans (OCD) in the canine knee joint. Description of the technique and preliminary results following the treatment of five cases. Tierärztl Prax 2003, 31:346-355.
3. Hangody L, Rathonyi GK, Duska Z. Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A((Suppl 1)):65-72.
4. Böttcher P, Zeissler M, Grevel V, Oechtering G. Computer simulation of the distal aspect of the femur for assessment of donor core size and surface curvature for autologous osteochondral transplantation in the canine stifle joint. Vet Surg 2010, 39:371-379.
5. Böttcher P, Zeissler M, Maierl J. Mapping of split-line pattern and cartilage thickness of selected donor and recipient sites for autologous osteochondral transplantation in the canine stifle joint. Vet Surg 2009, 38:696-704.
6. Changoor A, Hurtig M, Runciman R. Mapping of donor and recipient site properties for osteochondral graft reconstruction of subchondral cystic lesions in the equine stifle joint. Equine Vet J 2006, 38:330-336.
7. Schlichting K, Schell H, Kleemann RU. Influence of scaffold stiffness on subchondral bone and subsequent cartilage regeneration in an ovine model of osteochondral defect healing. Am J Sports Med 2008, 36:2379-2391.
8. von Rechenberg B, Akens MK, Nadler D. Changes in subchondral bone in cartilage resurfacing-an experimental study in sheep using different types of osteochondral grafts. Osteoarthr Cartil 2003, 11:265-277.
9. Hangody L, Udvarhelyi I, Kish G. Autogenous osteochondral graft technique for replacing knee cartilage defects in dogs. Orthop Int 1997, 5:175-181.
10. Müller-Gerbl M. The subchondral bone plate. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 1998, 141:1-134. III-XI
11. Easton KL, Kawcak CE. Evaluation of increased subchondral bone density in areas of contact in the metacarpophalangeal joint during joint loading in horses. Am J Vet Res 2007, 68:816-821.
12. Maierl J, Schäfer C, Böttcher P. Die subchondrale Knochendichte am Fesselgelenk des Pferdes. Teil 1: Computertomographische Osteoabsorptiometrie (CT-OAM). Pferdeheilkunde 2001, 17:339-345.
13. Mühlhofer H, Ercan Y, Drews S. Mineralisation and mechanical strength of the subchondral bone plate of the inferior tibial facies. Surg Radiol Anat 2009, 31:237-243.
14. Müller-Gerbl M, Putz R, Hodapp N. Computed tomography-osteoabsorptiometry for assessing the density distribution of subchondral bone as a measure of long-term mechanical adaptation in individual joints. Skeletal Radiol 1989, 18:507-512.
15. Müller-Gerbl M, Putz R, Hodapp NH. Computed tomography-osteoabsorptiometry: a method of assessing the mechanical condition of the major joints in a living subject. Clin Biomech 1990, 5:193-198.
16. Maierl J, Kaiser A, Böttcher P. Subchondral bone density pattern in the normal canine carpal joint. J Biomech 2006, 39((Suppl 1)):S502.
17. Adams JE. Quantitative computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 2009, 71:415-424.
18. Schroeder W, Martin K, Lorensen B. The Visualization Toolkit. An Object-Oriented Approach to 3D Graphics 2006, ed 4, New York, NY, Kitware Inc.
19. Riegert S. An anatomical and biomechanical analysis of the canine stifle joint (articulatio genus), Thesis, Institute of Veterinary Anatomy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany, 2004
20. Garner M, Altman D. Confidence intervals rather than P values. Statistics with Confidence 2005, 15-27. Altman D, Machin DBryant T. (eds), ed 2, London, BMJ Books
21. Noble J, Alexander K. Studies of tibial subchondral bone density and its significance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985, 67:295-302.
22. Hurtig M, Pearce S, Warren S. Arthroscopic mosaic arthroplasty in the equine third carpal bone. Vet Surg 2001, 30:228-239.
23. Lane JG, Tontz JWL, Ball ST. A morphologic, biochemical, and biomechanical assessment of short-term effects of osteochondral autograft plug transfer in an animal model. Arthroscopy 2001, 17:856-863.
24. Radin EL, Rose RM. Role of subchondral bone in the initiation and progression of cartilage damage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986, 213:34-40.
25. Fahlgren A, Messner K, Aspenberg P. Meniscectomy leads to an early increase in subchondral bone plate thickness in the rabbit knee. Acta Orthop Scand 2003, 74:437-441.
26. Lajeunesse D. The role of bone in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004, 12((Suppl A)):S34-S38.
27. Kawcak CE, McIlwraith CW, Norrdin RW. The role of subchondral bone in joint disease: a review. Equine Vet J 2001, 33:120-126.
28. Pearce SG, Hurtig MB, Clarnette R. An investigation of 2 techniques for optimizing joint surface congruency using multiple cylindrical osteochondral autografts. Arthroscopy 2001, 17:50-55.
29. Hangody L, Vasarhelyi G, Hangody LR. Autologous osteochondral grafting-technique and long-term results. Injury 2008, 39((Suppl 1)):S32-S39.
30. Nakaji N, Fujioka H, Nagura I. The structural properties of an osteochondral cylinder graft-recipient construct on autologous osteochondral transplantation. Arthroscopy 2006, 22:422-427.
31. Kock N, Smolders J, van Susante J. A cadaveric analysis of contact stress restoration after osteochondral transplantation of a cylindrical cartilage defect. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008, 16:461-468.
32. Samii VF, Les CM, Schulz KS. Computed tomographic osteoabsorptiometry of the elbow joint in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 2002, 63:1159-1166.
33. Böttcher P, Zeissler M, Winkels P. Mosaicplasty in the elbow of a dog: instrumentation and evaluation of achieved joint congruency by computed tomography and computed tomographic osteoabsorptiometry. Tierärztl Prax 2007, 35(K):253-260.
34. Kaiser A, Böttcher P, Maierl J. Subchondral bone density pattern in the canine carpal joint. Tierärztl Prax 2007, 35(K):261-266.
35. Dickomeit M, Maierl J, Böttcher P. 436-437. Subchondral bone density in the healthy canine elbow joint-a new approach to a better understanding of the diseased joint, in BSAVA Congress 2007, Birmingham, UK, April 12-15, 2007, pp
36. Maierl J, Böttcher P, Liebich HG. Biomechanics of the fractured medial coronoid process and the isolated anconeal process in the canine elbow joint. Anat Histol Embryol 2005, 34:31.
37. Maierl J, Lieser B, Böttcher P. Morphological and biomechanical properties of the canine hip joint. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005, 18:A32.
38. Müller-Gerbl M. CT-Osteoabsorptiometrie (CT-OAM) und ihr Einsatz zur Analyse der Langzeitbeanspruchung der großen Gelenke in vivo. PhD Thesis, Anatomische Anstalt, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany, 1991
39. Chalmers HJ, Dykes NL, Lust G. Assessment of bone mineral density of the femoral head in dogs with early osteoarthritis. Am J Vet Res 2006, 67:796-800.