Computer simulation of the distal aspect of the femur for assessment of donor core size and surface curvature for autologous osteochondral transplantation in the canine stifle joint

Veterinary Surgery

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 371-379

  Böttcher, Peter ^a   Zeissler, Markus ^a   Grevel, Vera ^a   Oechtering, Gerhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOG; DOG DISEASE; FEMUR; HINDLIMB; TRANSPLANTATION;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOG DISEASES; DOGS; FEMUR; STIFLE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 77953170218     PISSN: 01613499     EISSN: 1532950X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00671.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Cook JL, Hudson CC, Kuroki K. Autogenous osteochondral grafting for treatment of stifle osteochondrosis in dogs. Vet Surg 2008, 37:311-321.
2. Frank M. Use of osteochondral grafting for therapy of osteochondrosis dissecans (OCD) in the canine knee joint. Description of the technique and preliminary results following the treatment of five cases. Tierärztl Prax 2003, 31:346-355. (K)
3. Hangody L, Fules P. Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weight-bearing joints: ten years of experimental and clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85-A((Suppl 2)):25-32.
4. Hangody L, Udvarhelyi I, Kish G. Autogenous osteochondral graft technique for replacing knee cartilage defects in dogs. Orthop Int 1997, 5:175-181.
5. Gudas R, Kalesinskas RJ, Kimtys V. A prospective randomized clinical study of mosaic osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral defects in the knee joint in young athletes. Arthroscopy 2005, 21:1066-1075.
6. Gudas R, Stankevicius E, Monastyreckiene E. Osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee joint in athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006, 14:834-842.
7. Hangody L, Rathonyi GK, Duska Z. Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A((Suppl 1)):65-72.
8. Wirth CJ, Rudert M. Techniques of cartilage growth enhancement: a review of the literature. Arthroscopy 1996, 12:300-308.
9. Nakagawa Y, Suzuki T, Kuroki H. The effect of surface incongruity of grafted plugs in osteochondral grafting: a report of five cases. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007, 15:591-596.
10. Huang FS, Simonian PT, Norman AG. Effects of small incongruities in a sheep model of osteochondral autografting. Am J Sports Med 2004, 32:1842-1848.
11. Desjardins MR, Hurtig MB, Palmer NC. Heterotopic transfer of fresh and cryopreserved autogenous articular cartilage in the horse. Vet Surg 1991, 20:434-445.
12. Pearce SG, Hurtig MB, Clarnette R. An investigation of 2 techniques for optimizing joint surface congruency using multiple cylindrical osteochondral autografts. Arthroscopy 2001, 17:50-55.
13. Koh JL, Kowalski A, Lautenschlager E. The effect of angled osteochondral grafting on contact pressure: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 2006, 34:116-119.
14. Koh JL, Wirsing K, Lautenschlager E. The effect of graft height mismatch on contact pressure following osteochondral grafting: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 2004, 32:317-320.
15. Koenderink JJ. Solid Shape 1990, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
16. Nielsen M, Olsen O, Sig M. Koenderink corner points. Visual Form 2001 2001, 420-430. Goos G, Hartmanis J, van Leeuwen J. in, (eds), Berlin, Springer-Verlag, pp
17. Ahmad CS, Cohen ZA, Levine WN. Biomechanical and topographic considerations for autologous osteochondral grafting in the knee. Am J Sports Med 2001, 29:201-206.
18. Terukina M, Fujioka H, Yoshiya S. Analysis of the thickness and curvature of articular cartilage of the femoral condyle. Arthroscopy 2003, 19:969-973.
19. Bartz RL, Kamaric E, Noble PC. Topographic matching of selected donor and recipient sites for osteochondral autografting of the articular surface of the femoral condyles. Am J Sports Med 2001, 29:207-212.
20. Böttcher P, Zeissler M, Maierl J. Mapping of split-line pattern and cartilage thickness of selected donor and recipient sites for autologous osteochondral transplantation in the canine stifle joint. Vet Surg 2009, 38:696-704.
21. Böttcher P, Zeissler M, Grevel V. Mapping of subchondral bone density of selected donor and recipient sites for autologous osteochondral transplantation in the canine stifle joint. Vet Surg In press. DOI, 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00657.x
22. Lane JG, Massie JB, Ball ST. Follow-up of osteochondral plug transfers in a goat model: a 6-month study. Am J Sports Med 2004, 32:1440-1450.
23. Schroeder W, Martin K, Lorensen B. The Visualization Toolkit. An Object-Oriented Approach to 3D Graphics 2006, ed 4, New York, NY, Kitware Inc.
24. Fitzpatrick N, Yeadon R, Smith TJ. Early clinical experience with osteochondral autograft transfer for treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the medial humeral condyle in dogs. Vet Surg 2009, 38:246-260.
25. Garner M, Altman D. Confidence intervals rather than P values. Statistics with Confidence 2005, 15-27. Altman D, Machin DBryant T. in, (eds), ed 2, London, BMJ Books, pp
26. Hurtig M, Pearce S, Warren S. Arthroscopic mosaic arthroplasty in the equine third carpal bone. Vet Surg 2001, 30:228-239.
27. Duchow J, Hess T, Kohn D. Primary stability of press-fit-implanted osteochondral grafts. Influence of graft size, repeated insertion, and harvesting technique. Am J Sports Med 2000, 28:24-27.
28. Levy AS, Meier SW. Osteochondral autograft replacement. Articular Cartilage Lesions 2004, 73-81. Cole BJ, Malek MM. in, (eds), New York, Springer-Verlag, pp
29. Choung D, Christensen JC. Mosaicplasty of the talus: a joint contact analysis in a cadaver model. J Foot Ankle Surg 2002, 41:65-75.
30. Guettler JH, Demetropoulos CK, Yang KH. Osteochondral defects in the human knee: influence of defect size on cartilage rim stress and load redistribution to surrounding cartilage. Am J Sports Med 2004, 32:1451-1458.
31. Raimondi MT, Pietrabissa R. Contact pressures at grafted cartilage lesions in the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005, 13:444-450.
32. Hohe J, Ateshian G, Reiser M. Surface size, curvature analysis, and assessment of knee joint incongruity with MRI in vivo. Magn Reson Med 2002, 47:554-561.
33. Thaunat M, Couchon S, Lunn J. Cartilage thickness matching of selected donor and recipient sites for osteochondral autografting of the medial femoral condyle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007, 15:381-386.
34. Böttcher P, Zeissler M, Winkels P. Mosaicplasty in the elbow of a dog: instrumentation and evaluation of achieved joint congruency by computed tomography and computed tomographic osteoabsorptiometry. Tierärztl Prax 2007, 35:253-260. (K)