Judicial review litigation as an incentive to change in local authority public services in England and Wales

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 20, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2010, Pages

  Platt, Lucinda ^a   Sunkin, Maurice ^a   Calvo, Kerman ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954374324     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: 14779803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muq027     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Audit Commission. 2003. Human rights: Improving public service delivery. London: Audit Commission.
2. Bondy, Varda, and Maurice Sunkin. 2008. Accessing judicial review. Public Law. 647-667
3. -. 2009a. Settlement in judicial review proceedings. Public Law. 237-259
4. -. 2009b. The dynamics of judicial review litigation: The resolution of public law challenges before final hearing. London: Public Law Project.
5. Bridges, Lee, George Meszaros, and Maurice Sunkin. 1995. Judicial review in perspective, 2nd ed. London: Cavendish Publishing.
6. Buck, Alexy, Pascoe Pleasence, and Nigel J. Balmer. 2008. Do citizens known how to deal with legal issues? Some empirical insights. Journal of Social Policy 37:661-681
7. Calvo, Kerman, Lucinda Platt, and Maurice Sunkin. 2008. Does judicial review influence the quality of local authority services? Institute for Social and Economic Research Working Paper 2007-2034 Colchester, UK: Univ. of Essex.
8. Cane, Peter. 2004. Understanding judicial review and its impact. In Judicial review and bureaucratic impact: International and interdisciplinary perspectives, eds. M. Hertogh and S. Halliday, 15-42. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
9. Canon, Bradley C. 2004. Studying bureaucratic implementation of judicial policies in the United States: Conceptual and methodological approaches. In Judicial review and bureaucratic impact: International and interdisciplinary perspective, eds. M. Hertogh and S. Halliday, 76-101. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
10. Clarke, John. 2005. Performing for the public: doubt, desire and the evaluation of public services. In The values of bureaucracy, ed. P. du Gay, 211-233 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
11. Commission for Social Care Inspection. 2005. Safeguarding children: The second joint chief inspectors' report on arrangements to safeguard children. London: CSCI.
12. Cowan, David, and Simon Halliday. 2003. The appeal of internal review. Oxford: Hart.
13. Creyke, Robin, and John McMillan. 2004. Judicial review outcomes-An empirical study. Australian Journal of Administrative Law 11:82-100.
14. du Gay, Paul. 2000. In praise of bureaucracy: Weber, organisation, ethics. London: Sage.
15. -(ed). 2005. The values of bureaucracy. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
16. Fréchette, Guillaume R. 2001. Random-effects ordered probit. Stata Technical Bulletin 59:23-27
17. Free, Elli. 2005. Local authority support to unaccompanied asylum-seeking young people: Changes since the Hillingdon judgment. Save the children research report. London: Save the Children.
18. Gambitta, Richard. 1981. Litigation, judicial deference and policy change. Law & Policy 3:141-165
19. Genn, Hazel. 1999. Paths to justice. Oxford: Hart.
20. Gregg, Paul, Paul A. Grout, Anita Ratcliffe, Sarah Smith, and Frank Windmeijer. 2008. How important is pro-social behaviour in the delivery of public services? Research Paper 07/197. The Centre for Market and Public Organisation. Bristol, UK: Univ. of Bristol.
21. Halliday, Simon. 2004. Judicial review and compliance with administrative law. Oxford: Hart.
22. -. 2000. The influence of judicial review on bureaucratic decision-making. Public Law 110-122.
23. Hertogh, Marc, and Simon Halliday, eds. 2004. Judicial review and bureaucratic impact: International and interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
24. Hoggett, Paul. 2005. A service to the public: The containment of ethical and moral conflicts by public bureaucracies. In The values of bureaucracy, ed. P. du Gay, 165-191 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
25. Houston, David J. 2000. Public-service motivation: A multivariate test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10:713-727
26. Jacobs, Rowena, and Maria Goddard. 2007. How do performance indicators add up? An examination of composite indicators in public services. Public Money and Management 27:103-110
27. Law Commission. 2008. Administrative redress: Public bodies and the citizen. Consultation Paper No. 187. London: Law Commission.
28. Levinson, Daryil J. 2000. Making governments pay: Markets, politics and the allocation of constitutional costs. University of Chicago Law Review 67:345.
29. Lewis, Clive. 2004. Judicial remedies in public law, 3rd ed London: Sweet & Maxwell.
30. Loveland, Ian. 1995. Housing homeless persons: Administrative law and process. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
31. McLean, Ian, Dirk Haubrich, and Roxana Gutiérrez-Romero. 2007. The perils and pitfalls of performance measurement: The CPA regime for local authorities in England. Public Money and Management, 27:111-118
32. Miller, Daniel. 2005. What is best "value"? Bureaucracy, virtualism and local governance. In The values of bureaucracy, ed. P. du Gay, 233-257 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
33. Needham, Catherine E. 2006. Customer care and the public service ethos. Public Administration 84:845-860.
34. O'Leary, Rosemary. 1989. The impact of federal court decisions on policies and administration of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Administrative Law Review 41:549-574
35. Refugee Council. 2005. Ringing the changes: The impact of guidance on the use of Sections 17 and 20 of the Children Act 1989 to support unaccompanied asylum-seeking children. London: Refugee Council.
36. Richardson, Genevra. 2004. Impact studies in the UK. In Judicial review and bureaucratic impact: International and interdisciplinary perspectives, eds. Marc Hertogh and Simon Halliday, 103-129: Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
37. Richardson, Genevra, and Maurice Sunkin. 1996. Judicial review: Questions of impact. Public Law 79-103.
38. Rosenthal, Lawrence. 2007. A theory of governmental damages liability: Torts, constitutional torts and takings. Journal of Constitutional Law, 9:797-870.
39. Simmons, Richard A., Johnston Birchall, and Alan Prout. 2007. Hearing voices: User involvement in public services. Consumer Policy Review 17:234-240.
40. Sunkin, Maurice. 2004. Conceptual issues in researching the impact of judicial review on government bureaucracies. In Judicial review and bureaucratic impact: International and interdisciplinary perspectives, eds. Marc Hertogh and Simon Halliday, 43-76. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
41. Sunkin, Maurice, Kerman Calvo, Lucinda Platt, and Todd Landman. 2007. Mapping the use of judicial review to challenge local authorities in England & Wales. Public Law 545-567
42. Tate C. Neal, and Torbjörn Vallinder, eds. The global expansion of judicial power. New York: New York Univ. Press.