Conceptual issues in researching the impact of judicial review on government bureaucracies

Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact: International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 43-75

  Sunkin, Maurice ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954369347     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511493782.003     Document Type: Chapter

References (76)

1. G. N. Rosenberg's The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change (Chicago, University of Chicago, 1991).
2. D. A. Schultz (ed.), Leveraging the Law: Using the Courts to Achieve Social Change (New York, Peter Lang, 1998).
3. M. Bulmer, 'Facts, Concepts, Theories and Problems' in M. Bulmer (ed.), Social Research Methods (London, Macmillan, 1984).
4. A. Bryman, Social Research Methods (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001), Chapter 2.
5. M. W. McCann, 'Law and Political Struggles for Social Change: Puzzles, Paradoxes, and Promises in Future Research,' in Schultz, Leveraging the Law, p. 336.
6. G. Richardson and M. Sunkin, 'Judicial Review: Questions of Impact' [1996] Public Law 79.
7. S. Halliday, 'Researching the "Impact" of Judicial Review on Routine Administrative Decision-Making' in D. Cowan (ed.), Housing: Participation and Exclusion (Dartmouth, Aldershot, 1998), p. 196.
8. S. A. De Smith, H. Woolf and J. A. Jowell, Judicial Review of Administrative Action (5th edn, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1995), p. vii.
9. R. Gambitta, 'Litigation, Judicial Deference and Policy Change' in R. Gambitta, M. May and J. Foster (eds.), Governing Through Courts (New York, Sage, 1981).
10. M. Sunkin and K. Pick, 'The Changing Impact of Judicial Review: The Independent Review Service of the Social Fund' [2001] Public Law 736 at 757 (hereafter referred to as the IRS study).
11. S. James, 'The Political and Administrative Consequences of Judicial Review' (1996) 74 Public Administration 613-37 at 619.
12. R. Sainsbury, 'Social Security Decision-Making and Appeals: Chequered History, Uncertain Future?' in N. Harris (ed.), Social Security Law in Context (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 208.
13. Sunkin and Pick, 'The Changing Impact,' p. 757.
14. M. Sunkin, 'Withdrawing: AProblem in Judicial Review?' in P. Leyland and T. Woods (eds.), Administrative Law Facing the Future: Old Constraints and New Horizons (London, Blackstone Press, 1997).
15. L. Bridges, G. Meszaros and M. Sunkin, 'Regulating Judicial Review' [2000] Public Law 651 at 666-9.
16. The Impact of the Human Rights Act on Judicial Review (London, Public Law Project, 2003).
17. T. Daintith and A. Page, The Executive in the Constitution (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999).
18. S. Halliday, 'The Influence of Judicial Review on Bureaucratic Decision-Making' [2000] Public Law 110 at 111.
19. Halliday, 'Researching the "Impact" of Judicial Review,' p. 192.
20. M. Sunkin, 'Judicial Review's Liveability' [1989] Legal Action 10.
21. R. v. Home Secretary, ex parte Khawaja [1984] AC 74.
22. Richardson and Sunkin, 'Questions of Impact,' p. 91.
23. R. O'Leary, 'The Impact of Federal Court Decisions on the Policies and Administration of the US Environmental Protection Agency' (1989) 41 Administrative Law Review 549.
24. Sunkin and Pick, 'The Changing Impact.'.
25. M. Galanter, 'The Radiating Effects of Courts' in K. O. Boyum and L. Mather (eds.), Empirical Theories about Courts (New York, Longman, 1983), pp. 117-42.
26. McCann, 'Law and Political Struggles.'.
27. J. Jowell, 'The Rule of Law Today' in J. Jowell and D. Oliver (eds.), The Changing Constitution (4th edn, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000).
28. J. Mashaw, Bureaucratic Justice (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1983).
29. L. Clements and R. Morris, 'The Millenium Blip: The Human Rights Act 1998 and Local Government' in S. Halliday and P. Schmidt (eds.), Human Rights Brought Home: Socio-Legal Perspectives on Human Rights in the National Context (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2004).
30. Lord Woolf in M. v. Home Office [1993] 3 All ER 537 at 567b.
31. D. Feldman, 'Judicial Review: AWay of Controlling Government?' (1988) 66 Public Administration 21.
32. T. Buck, 'Judicial Review and the Discretionary Social Fund' in T. Buck (ed.), Judicial Review and Social Welfare (London, Pinter, 1998), p. 129.
33. G. Richardson and D. Machin, 'Judicial Review and Tribunal Decision Making: A Study of the Mental Health Review Tribunal' [2000] Public Law 494 at 496.
34. Galanter, 'The Radiating Effects.'.
35. McCann, 'Law and Political Struggles,' p. 334.
36. D. Beetham, Bureaucracy (2nd edn, Buckingham, Open University Press, 1996), especially at pp. 3-4.
37. M. Taggart (ed.), The Province of Administrative Law (Oxford, Hart, 1997).
38. James, 'The Political and Administrative Consequences,' p. 620.
39. P. Hennesey, Whitehall (2nd edn, London, Fontana, 1990).
40. L. Bridges, G. Meszaros and M. Sunkin, Judicial Review in Perspective (2nd edn, London, Cavendish, 1995), especially Chapter 3.
41. R. v. Hull Prison Board of Visitors, ex parte St Germain (No. 1) [1979] QB 425.
42. M. Sunkin and A. Le Sueur, 'Can Government Control Judicial Review' (1991) 44 Current Legal Problems 161-83 at 168.
43. M. Loughlin, 'The Underside of the Law: Judicial Review and the Prison Disciplinary System' (1993) 46 Current Legal Problems 43.
44. M. Loughlin and P. Quinn, 'Prison Rules and Courts: A Study of Administrative Law' (1993) 56 Modern Law Review 497.
45. S. Livingstone, 'The Changing Face of Prison Discipline' in E. Player and M. Jenkins (eds.), Prisons AfterWoolf: Reform Through Riot (London, Routledge, 1994).
46. S. Livingstone, 'The Impact of Judicial Review on Prisons' in B. Hadfield (ed.), Judicial Review: A Thematic Approach (Dublin, Gill and Macmillan, 1995).
47. Sunkin and Pick, 'The Changing Impact.'.
48. S. M. Sterett, Creating Constitutionalism? The Politics of Legal Expertise and Administrative Law in England and Wales (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1997).
49. Kingsley v. UK (2002) 35 EHRR 177 at 302.
50. Lord Hoffmann in Begum v. Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 5, [2003] 2 AC 430 at paras. 55 and 56.
51. I. Loveland, Housing Homeless Persons (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995).
52. M. Hertogh, 'Coercion, Cooperation, and Control: Understanding the Policy Impact of Administrative Courts and the Ombudsman in the Netherlands' (2001) 23 Law and Policy 47-67.
53. D. Barak-Erez, 'Judicial Review of Politics: The Israeli Case' (2002) 29 Journal of Law and Society 611-31.
54. Richardson and Sunkin, 'Questions of Impact,' p. 93.
55. F. Bennion, Statutory Interpretation (2nd edn, London, Butterworths, 1992), p. 94.
56. T. Buck, The Social Fund (2nd edn, London, Sweet and Maxwell, 2000).
57. Richardson and Sunkin, 'Questions of Impact,' pp. 93-4.
58. Sunkin and Le Sueur, 'Government Control,' p. 162.
59. 'Judge Over Your Shoulder: Judicial Review: Balancing the Scales' (London, Cabinet Office, 1994).
60. Daintith and Page, The Executive, p. 345.
61. R. Cotterrell, 'Judicial Review and Legal Theory' in G. Richardson and H. G. Genn (eds.), Administrative Law and Government Action (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1994).
62. H. W. R. Wade and C. F. Forsyth, Administrative Law (8th edn, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 41.
63. R. Lempert, 'Strategies of Research Design in the Legal Impact Study: The Control of Plausible Rival Hypotheses' (1966) 1 Law and Society Review 111-32.
64. G. N. Rosenberg 'Knowledge and Desire: Thinking about Courts and Social Change' in Schultz, Leveraging the Law, pp. 251-91.
65. D. Schultz and S. E. Gottlieb 'Legal Functionalism and Social Change: A Reassessment of Rosenberg's The Hollow Hope' in Schultz, Leveraging the Law, pp. 192-6.
66. M. Weber, The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (New York, Free Press, 1947).
67. R. Baldwin and K. Hawkins, 'Discretionary Justice: Davis Reconsidered' [1984] Public Law 570-99 at 581.
68. Halliday, 'Researching the Impact,' p. 196.
69. M. Hammersley and P. Atkinson, Ethnography: Principles in Practice (2nd edn, London, Routledge, 1995).
70. P. Brewaer, Ethnography (Buckingham, Open University Press, 2000).
71. Halliday, 'The Influence of Judicial Review,' p. 111.
72. H. Becker and B. Geer, 'Participant Observation and Interviewing: AComparison' (1957) 16 Human Organisation 28.
73. M. Denscombe, The Good Research Guide (Buckingham, Open University Press, 1998), p. 148.
74. Loveland, Housing Homeless Persons, p. 4.
75. T. Buck, 'Discretionary Social Fund,' p. 115.
76. R. (on the application of Cowl and others) v. Plymouth City Council (Practice Note) [2002] 1 WLR 803.