Impact studies in the United Kingdom

Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact: International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 103-128

  Richardson, Genevra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646081751     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511493782.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (104)

1. C. Forsyth (ed.), Judicial Review and the Constitution (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000).
2. G. Richardson and M. Sunkin, 'Judicial Review: Questions of Impact' [1996] Public Law 79.
3. G. Richardson, Law, Process and Custody: Prisoners and Patients (London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1993).
4. D. Galligan, Due Process and Fair Procedures (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996).
5. J. Mashaw, Due Process in the Administrative State (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1985).
6. S. Halliday, 'The Influence of Judicial Review on Bureaucratic Decision-Making' [2000] Public Law 110.
7. M. Tushnet, Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1999).
8. R. Cranston, 'Reviewing Judicial Review' in G. Richardson and H. Genn (eds.), Administrative Law and Government Action (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994).
9. R. Rawlings, 'Litigation as Political Action' in I. Loveland (ed.), A Special Relationship? American Influences on Public Law in the UK (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996).
10. S. Livingstone, 'The Impact of Judicial Review on Prisons' in B. Hadfield (ed.), Judicial Review: A Thematic Approach (Dublin, Gill and McMillan, 1995).
11. G. Richardson and M. Sunkin, 'Judicial Review: Questions of Impact' [1996] Public Law 79.
12. S. Halliday, 'Researching the Impact of Judicial Review on Routine Administrative Decision-Making' in D. Cowan (ed.), Housing, Participation and Exclusion (Aldershot, Dartmouth, 1998).
13. T. Daintith and A. Page, The Executive in the Constitution (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999).
14. Halliday, 'Researching the Impact.'.
15. T. Prosser, Test Cases for the Poor: Legal Techniques in the Politics of Social Welfare (London, Child Poverty Action Group, 1983).
16. M. Loughlin and P. Quinn, 'Prisons, Rules and Courts: A Study of Administrative Law' (1993) 56 Modern Law Review 497.
17. Richardson, Law, Process and Custody.
18. Livingstone, 'The Impact of Judicial Review.'.
19. Richardson, Law, Process and Custody.
20. S. Livingstone and T. Owen, Prison Law (2nd edn, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999).
21. Prosser, Test Cases.
22. C. Harlow, 'Administrative Reaction to Judicial Review' [1976] Public Law 116.
23. T. Campbell, K. D. Ewing and A. Tomkins (eds.), Sceptical Essays on Human Rights (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001).
24. S. Fredman, 'Scepticism Under Scrutiny: Labour Law and Human Rights' in Campbell, Ewing and Tomkins, Scepticism.
25. Tushnet, Taking the Constitution.
26. M. Tushnet, 'Scepticism about Judicial Review: A Perspective from the United States' in Campbell, Ewing and Tomkins, Scepticism.
27. W. Sadurski, 'Rights-Based Constitutional Review in Central and Eastern Europe' in Campbell, Ewing and Tompkins, Scepticism.
28. W. Sadurski, 'Judicial Review and the Protection of Constitutional Rights' (2002) 22 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 275.
29. S. James, 'The Political and Administrative Consequences of Judicial Review' (1996) 74 Public Administration 613.
30. M. Kerry, 'Administrative Law and Judicial Review' (1986) 64 Public Administration 163.
31. A. Hammond, 'Judicial Review: The Continuing Interplay Between Law and Policy' [1998] Public Law 34.
32. Hammond, 'Judicial Review,' p. 43.
33. T. Prosser, 'Politics and Judicial Review: The Atkinson Case and Its Aftermath' [1979] Public Law 59.
34. L. Bridges, C. Game, J. McBridge, O. Lomas and S. Ranson, Legality and Local Politics (Aldershot, Gower, 1987).
35. I. Loveland, Housing Homeless Persons (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995).
36. D. Obadina, 'Judicial Review and Gypsy Site Provision' in T. Buck (ed.), Judicial Review and Social Welfare (London, Pinter, 1998).
37. T. Daintith and A. Page, The Executive in the Constitution (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999).
38. T. Mullen, K. Pick and T. Prosser, Judicial Review in Scotland (Chichester, Wiley, 1996).
39. T. Buck, 'Judicial Review and the Discretionary Social Fund: The Impact on a Respondent Organisation' in T. Buck (ed.), Judicial Review and Social Welfare (London, Pinter, 1998).
40. Halliday, 'The Influence of Judicial Review'.
41. Halliday, 'Researching the Impact.'.
42. G. Richardson and D. Machin, 'Judicial Review and Tribunal Decision-Making: A Study of the Mental Health Review Tribunal' [2000] Public Law 494.
43. G. Richardson and D. Machin, 'Doctors on Tribunals: A Confusion of Roles' (2000b) 176 British Journal of Psychiatry 110.
44. M. Sunkin and K. Pick, 'The Changing Impact of Judicial Review' [2001] Public Law 736.
45. Halliday, 'The Influence of Judicial Review,' p. 111.
46. Buck, 'Discretionary Social Fund,' p. 115.
47. Sunkin and Pick, 'The Changing Impact,' p. 742.
48. Mullen, Pick and Prosser, Judicial Review, p. 114.
49. Halliday, 'Researching the Impact,' pp. 190-5.
50. Buck, 'Discretionary Social Fund,' pp. 129-30.
51. Halliday, 'The Influence of Judicial Review,' pp. 116-17.
52. Sunkin and Pick, 'The Changing Impact.'.
53. Halliday, 'The Influence of Judicial Review.'.
54. S. Halliday, 'Internal Review and Administrative Justice' (2001) 23 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 473.
55. C. Scott, 'Accountability in the Regulatory State' (2000) 27 Journal of Law and Society 38.
56. Loveland, Housing Homeless Persons, Chapter 11.
57. Sunkin and Pick, 'The Changing Impact,' p. 748.
58. Daintith and Page, The Executive, p. 337.
59. Halliday, 'The Influence of Judicial Review,' p. 122.
60. Richardson and Machin, 'Judicial Review'.
61. Richardson and Machin, 'Doctors on Tribunals.'.
62. S. Sterett, Creating Constitutionalism? The Politics of Legal Expertise and Administrative Law (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1997).
63. Halliday, 'The Influence of Judicial Review,' p. 122.
64. G. Richardson and D. Machin, 'A Clash of Values? Mental Health Review Tribunals and Judicial Review' (1999) 1 Journal of Mental Health Law 3.
65. N. Eastman and J. Peay, Law Without Enforcement: Integrating Mental Health and Justice (Oxford, Hart, 1999).
66. P. Bartlett and R. Sandland, Mental Health Law: Policy and Practice (London, Blackstone, 2000).
67. J. Peay, Decisions and Dilemmas: Working with Mental Health Law (Oxford, Hart, 2003).
68. G. Teubner, A. Bankowska, R. Adler and Z. Bankowski, Law as an Autopoietic System (Oxford, Blackwell, 1993).
69. M. King, 'The "Truth" about Autopoiesis' (1993) 20 Journal of Law and Society 218.
70. Richardson and Machin, 'Doctors on Tribunals.'.
71. D. Feldman, 'Judicial Review: AWay of Controlling Government?' (1988) 66 Public Administration 21.
72. R. Rawlings, 'Litigation as Political Action' in I. Loveland (ed.), A Special Relationship? American Influences on Public Law in the UK (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1995).
73. G. Teubner, 'Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law' (1983) 17 Law and Society Review 239.
74. M. Loughlin, Public Law and Political Theory (Oxford, Clarendon, 1992).
75. J. Black, 'Constitutionalising Self Regulation' (1996) 59 Modern Law Review 24.
76. J. Black, 'Reviewing Regulatory Rules' in J. Black, P. Muchlinski and P. Walker, Commercial Regulation and Judicial Review (Oxford, Hart, 1998).
77. P. Craig, Administrative Law (4th edn, London, Sweet and Maxwell, 1998).
78. A. Von Hirsch, A. Ashworth and M. Wasik, Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory: Essays in Honour of Andrew Von Hirsch (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1998), pp. 44-87.
79. Scott, 'Accountability,' p. 19.
80. M. Loughlin, Legality and Locality: The Role of Law in Central-Local Government Relations (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996).
81. Scott, 'Accountability'.
82. G. Teubner, Enterprise Corporatism: New Industrial Policy and the 'Essence' of the Legal System (Florence, European University Institute, 1987).
83. Scott, 'Accountability'.
84. Black, 'Reviewing.'.
85. Administrative Justice: Some Necessary Reforms: Report of the Committee of the Justice/All Souls Review of Administrative Law in the United Kingdom (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1998).
86. D. McBarnet and C. Whelan, 'The Elusive Spirit of the Law: Formalism and the Struggle for Legal Control' (1991) 54 Modern Law Review 848-73.
87. Black, 'Reviewing.'.
88. Richardson and Machin, 'Judicial Review,' p. 514.
89. Black, 'Reviewing.'.
90. Richardson, Law, Process and Custody, pp. 251-2.
91. D. B. Wexler and B. W. Winick (eds.), Law as a Therapeutic Key: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence (Durham, NC, Carolina Academic Press, 1996).
92. The Public Law Project, The Impact of the Human Rights Act on Judicial Review: An Empirical Research Study (Oxford, Nuffield Foundation, 2003).
93. J. G. Francis, The Politics of Regulation: A Comparative Perspective (Oxford, Blackwell, 1993).
94. R. Baldwin and M. Cave, Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999).
95. A. I. Ogus, Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994).
96. J. Black, Rules and Regulators (Oxford, Clarendon, 1997).
97. I. Ayres and J. Braithwaite, Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1992).
98. Teubner, Bankowska, Adler and Bankowski, Law as an Autopoietic System.
99. J. Black, 'Regulatory Conversations' (2002) 29 Journal of Law and Society 163.
100. K. Hawkins, Environment and Enforcement (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1984).
101. K. Hawkins and J. Thomas, Enforcing Regulation (Boston, Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1984).
102. Ayres and Braithwaite, Responsive Regulation.
103. B. Hutter, Compliance: Regulation and Environment (Oxford, Clarendon, 1997).
104. M. Hertogh, 'Coercion, Cooperation and Control: Understanding the Policy Impact of Administrative Courts and the Ombudsman in the Netherlands' (2001) 23 Law and Policy 47-67.