Spatial dynamics and the evolution of social monogamy in mammals

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 747-752

  Dobson, F Stephen ^a,b   Way, Brittany M ^b   Baudoin, Claude ^c  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13   (France)

Author keywords

body mass; home range; local population density; mammals; monogamy; phylogeny

Indexed keywords

BODY MASS; HOME RANGE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MAMMAL; MONOGAMY; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION DENSITY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SPATIAL VARIATION;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 77954352008     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arq048     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Allainé D. 2000. Sociality, mating system and reproductive skew in marmots: evidence and hypotheses. Behav Processes. 51:21-34.
2. Bininda-Emonds ORP, Gittleman JL, Purvis A. 1999. Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: a complete phylog-eny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia). Biol Rev. 74:143-175.
3. Birkhead TR, Møller AP. 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection. San Diego (CA): Academic Press.
4. Brotherton PNM, Komers PE. 2003. Mate guarding and the evolution of social monogamy in mammals. In: Reichard U, Boesch C, editors. Monogamy: mating strategies and partnerships in birds, humans and other mammals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 42-58.
5. Charmantier A, Blondel J, Perret P, Lambrechts MM. 2004. Do extra-pair paternities provide genetic benefits for female blue tits Parus caeruleus? J Avian Biol. 35:524-532.
6. Clutton-Brock TH. 1989. Mammalian mating systems. Proc R Soc Lond. Ser B Biol Sci. 236:339-372.
7. Creel SR, Waser PM. 1991. Failures of reproductive suppression in dwarf mongooses (Helogale parvula): accident or adaptation? Behav Ecol. 2:7-16.
8. Damuth J. 1981. Population density and body size in mammals. Nature. 290:699-700.
9. Damuth J. 1987. Interpsecific allometry of population density in mammals and other animals: the independence of body mass and population energy-use. Biol J Linn Soc. 31:193-246.
10. Debry RW. 2003. Identifying conflicting signal in a multigene analysis reveals a highly resolved tree: the phylogeny of Rodentia (Mammalia). Syst Biol. 52:604-617.
11. Dobson FS. 1982. Competition for mates and predominant juvenile male dispersal in mammals. Anim Behav. 30:1183-1192.
12. Dobson FS. 1985. The use of phylogeny in behavior and ecology. Evolution. 39:1384-1388.
13. Dobson FS, Jones WT. 1985. Multiple causes of dispersal. Am Nat. 126:855-858.
14. Dobson FS, Zinner B, Silva M. 2003. Testing models of biological scaling with mammalian population densities. Can J Zool. 81: 844-851.
15. Dubost G. 1988. Ecology and social life of the red acouchi, Myoprocta exilis; comparison with the orange-rumped agouti, Dasyprocta lepor-ina. J Zool (Lond). 214:107-123.
16. Emlen ST, Oring LW. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 197:215-223.
17. Felsenstein J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat. 125:1-15.
18. Fietz J, Zischler H, Schwiegk C, Tomiuk J, Dausmann KH, Ganzhorn JU. 2000. High rates of extra-pair young in the pair-living fat-tailed dwarf lemur, Cheirogaleus medius. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 49:8-17.
19. Fisher DO, Double MC, Blomberg SP, Jennions MD, Cockburn A. 2006. Post-mating sexual selection increases lifetime fitness of poly-androus females in the wild. Nature. 444:89-92.
20. Frame L, Malcolm J, Frame G, van Lawick H. 1979. Social organization of African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) on the Serengeti plains, Tanzania, 1967-1978. Z Tierpsychol. 50:225-249.
21. Garland T Jr, Bennett AF, Rezende EL. 2005. Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. J Exp Biol. 208:3015-3035.
22. Garland T Jr, Harvey PH, Ives AR. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst Biol. 41:18-42.
23. Garland T Jr, Midford PE, Ives AR. 1999. An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral values. Am Zool. 39:374-388.
24. Girman DJ, Mills MGL, Gefffen E, Wayne RK 1997. A molecular genetic analysis of social structure, dispersal, and interpack relationships of the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 40:187-198.
25. Goossens B, Graziani L, Waits LP, Farand E, Magnolon S, Coulon J, Bel MC, Taberlet P, Allainé D. 1998. Extra-pair paternity in the monogamous alpine marmot revealed by nuclear DNA microsatel-lite analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 43:281-288.
26. Greenwood PJ. 1980. Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav. 28:1140-1162.
27. Harvey PH, Pagel MD. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Jaarola M, Mart́inková N, Gunduz I, Brunhoff C, ZimaJ, Nadachowski A, Amori G, Bulatova NS, Chondropoulos B, Fraguedakis-Tsolis S. 2004. Molecular phylogeny of the speciose vole genus Microtus (Arvicolinae, Rodentia) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Phlogenet Evol. 33:647-663.
29. Jansa SA, Weksler M. 2004. Phylogeny of muroid rodents: relationships within and among major lineages as determined by IRBP gene sequences. Mol Phlogenet Evol. 31:256-276.
30. Jedrzejewski W, Schmidt K, Theuerkauf J, Jedrzejewska B, Kowalczyk R 2007. Territory size of wolves Canis lupus: linking local (Bialo-wieza Primeval Forest, Poland) and Holarctic-scale patterns. Ecog-raphy. 30:66-76.
31. Jennions MD, Petrie M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 75:21-64.
32. Jones JS, Wynne-Edwards KE. 2001. Paternal behaviour in biparental hamsters, Phodopus campbelli, does not require contact with the pregnant female. Anim Behav. 62:453-464.
33. Kalcounis-Rüppell MC, Ribble DO. 2007. A phylogenetic analysis of breeding systems of neotomine-peromyscine rodents. In: Wolff JO, Sherman PW, editors. Rodent societies: an ecological &evolutionary perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 68-85.
34. Keane B, Waser PM, Creel SR, Creel NM, Elliot LF, Minchella DJ. 1994. Subordinate reproduction in dwarf mongooses. Anim Behav. 47:65-75.
35. Kelt DA, Van Vuren DH. 2001. The ecology and macroecology of mammalian home range area. Am Nat. 157:637-645.
36. Kleiman DG. 1977. Monogamy in mammals. Q Rev Biol. 52:39-69.
37. Komers PE, Brotherton PNM. 1997. Female space use is the best predictor of monogamy in mammals. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 264:1261-1270.
38. Koprowski JL. 1993. Behavioral tactics, dominance, and copulatory success among male fox squirrels. Ethol Ecol Evol. 5:169-176.
39. Kummer H. 1968. Social organization of the hamadryas baboon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Lane JE, Boutin S, Gunn MR, Slate J, Coltman DW 2008. Female multiple mating and paternity in free-ranging North American red squirrels. Anim Behav. 75:1927-1937.
41. Manno TG, Dobson FS. 2008. Why are male Columbian ground squirrels territorial? Ethology. 114:1049-1060.
42. Manno TG, Vlasak AN, DeBarbieri LM, Wright KS, Kennedy SE, Dob-son FS. 2007. Why do male Columbian ground squirrels give a mating call? Anim Behav. 74:1319-1327.
43. Masters JC, Boniotto M, Crovella S, Roos C, Pozzi L, Delpero M. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships among the Lorisoidea as indicated by craniodental morphology and mitochondrial sequence data. Am J Primatol. 69:6-15.
44. Matthee CA, Davis SK 2001. Molecular insights into the evolution of the family Bovidae: a nuclear DNA perspective. Mol Biol Evol. 18:1220-1230.
45. Matthee CA, Robinson TJ. 1999. Cytochrome b phylogeny of the family Bovidae: resolution within the Alcelaphini, Antilopini, Neotragi-ni, and Tragelaphini. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 12:31-46.
46. McElligott AG, Hayden TJ. 2001. Postcopulatory vocalizations offal-low bucks: who is listening? Behav Ecol. 12:41-46.
47. Mock DW, Fujioka M. 1990. Monogamy and long-term pair bonding in vertebrates. Trends Ecol Evol. 5:39-43.
48. Price SA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Gittleman JL. 2005. A complete phy-logeny of the whales, dolphins and even-toed hoofed mammals (Cetartiodactyla). Biol Rev. 80:445-473.
49. Purvis A. 1995. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 348:405-421.
50. Rathbun GB, Rathbun CD. 2006. Social structure of bushveld sengi (Elephantulus intufi) in Namibia and the evolution of monogamy in the Macroscelidea. J Zool. 269:391-399.
51. Reichard U, Boesch C. 2003. Monogamy: mating strategies and partnerships in birds, humans and other mammals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Reyes A, Gissi C, Catzeflis F, Nevo E, Pesole G, Saccone C. 2004. Congruent mammalian trees from mitochondrial and nuclear genes using Bayesian methods. Mol Biol Evol. 21:397-403.
53. Ribble DO. 2003. The evolution of social and reproductive monogamy in Peromyscus: evidence from Peromyscus californicus (the California mouse). In: Reichard U, Boesch C, editors. Monogamy: mating strategies and partnerships in birds, humans and other mammals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 81-92.
54. Richardson PRK. 1987. Aardwolf mating system: overt cuckoldry in an apparently monogamous mammal. S Afr J Sci. 83:405-410.
55. van Schaik CP, Dunbar RIM. 1990. The evolution of monogamy in large primates: a new hypothesis and some crucial tests. Behaviour. 115:29-61.
56. van Schaik CP, Kappeler PM. 2003. The evolution of social monogamy in primates. In: Reichard U, Boesch C, editors. Monogamy: mating strategies and partnerships in birds, humans and other mammals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 59-80.
57. Shuster SM, Wade MJ. 2003. Mating systems and strategies. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
58. Sillero-Zubiri C, Gottelli D, Macdonald DW. 1996. Male philopatry, extra-pack copulations and inbreeding avoidance in Ethiopian wolves (Canis simensis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 38:331-340.
59. Silva M, Downing JA. 1995a. CRC handbook of mammalian body masses. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
60. Silva M, Downing JA. 1995b. The allometric scaling of density and body mass: a nonlinear relationship for terrestrial mammals. Am Nat. 145:704-727.
61. Smith AT, Ivins BL. 1986. Territorial intrusions by pikas (Ochotona princes) as a function of occupant activity. Anim Behav. 34:392-397.
62. Solomon NG, Keane B, Knoch LR, Hogan PJ. 2004. Multiple paternity in socially monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Can J Zool. 82:1667-1671.
63. Springer MS, Stanhope MJ, Madsen O, de Jong WW. 2004. Molecules consolidate the placental mammal tree. Trends Ecol Evol. 19: 430-438.
64. Steppan SJ, Adkins RM, Anderson J. 2004. Phylogeny and divergence-date estimates of rapid radiations in muriod rodents based on multiple nuclear genes. Syst Biol. 53:533-553.
65. Stoner CJ, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Caro T. 2003. The adaptive significance of coloration in lagomorphs. Biol J Linn Soc. 79: 309-328.
66. Sugg DW, Chesser RK, Dobson FS, Hoogland JL. 1996. Population genetics meets behavioral ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 11:338-342.
67. Symonds MRE. 2005. Phylogeny and life histories of the 'Insectivora': controversies and consequences. Biol Rev. 80:93-128.
68. Tamura N. 1995. Postcopulatory mate guarding by vocalization in the Formosan squirrel. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 36:377-386.
69. Wade MJ, Shuster SM. 2005. Don't throw Bateman out with the bathwater!. Integr Comp Biol. 45:945-951.
70. Wittenberger JF, Tilson RL. 1980. The evolution of monogamy: hypotheses and evidence. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 11:197-232.
71. Wolff JO, Dunlap AS. 2002. Multi-male mating, probability of conception, and litter size in the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster). Behav Processes. 58:105-110.
72. Wolff JO, Macdonald DW. 2004. Promiscuous females protect their offspring. Trends Ecol Evol. 19:127-134.
73. Wynne-Edwards KE. 1987. Evidence for obligate monogamy in the Djungarian hamster, Phodopus campbelli\pop survival under different parenting conditions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 20:427-437.
74. Wynne-Edwards KE. 1998. Evolution of parental care in Phodopus: conflict between adaptations for survival and adaptations for rapid reproduction. Am Zool. 38:238-250.