Phylogenetic relationships among the lorisoidea as indicated by craniodental morphology and mitochondrial sequence data

American Journal of Primatology

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 6-15

  Masters, Judith C ^a,b   Boniotto, Michele ^c   Crovella, Sergio ^c   Roos, Christian ^d   Pozzi, Luca ^e   Delpero, Massimiliano ^e  

^a NATAL MUSEUM   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

^d GERMAN PRIMATE CENTER   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Galagidae; Lorisidae; Molecules; Morphology; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CRANIUM; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PRIMATE; RELATEDNESS; TAXONOMY;

ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; DENTITION; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PROSIMIAN; SKULL;

ANIMALS; DENTITION; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; LORISIDAE; PHYLOGENY; SKULL;

GALAGOIDES; GALAGONIDAE; LORIDAE; MICROCEBUS MURINUS; PRIMATES; STREPSIRHINI;

EID: 33846354989     PISSN: 02752565     EISSN: 10982345     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20322     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Charles-Dominique P, Martin RD. 1970. Evolution of lorises and lemurs. Nature 227: 257-260.
2. Crovella S, Masters JC, Rumpler Y. 1994. Highly repeated DNA sequences as phylogenetic markers among the Galaginae. Am J Primatol 32:177-185.
3. De Boer LEM. 1973. Cytotaxonomy of the Lorisoidea (Primates: Prosimii). II. Chromsome studies in the Lorisidae and karyological relationships within the superfamily. Genetica 44:330-367.
4. DelPero M, Masters JC, Zuccon D, Cervella P, Crovella S, Ardito G. 2000. Mitochondrial sequences as indicators of generic classification in galagos. Int J Primatol 21: 889-904.
5. Farris JS, Källersjö M, Kluge AG, Bult C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
6. Gray JE. 1872. Notes on Propithecus, Indris, and other lemurs (Lemurina) in the British Museum. Proc Zool Soc Lond 1872:846-860.
7. Groves C. 2001. Primate taxonomy. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. 350p.
8. Hill WCO. 1953, Primates. Comparative anatomy and taxonomy. I: Strepsirhini. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 798p.
9. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F, Hall B. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
10. Jenner RA. 2004. Accepting partnership by submission? Morphological phylogenetics in a molecular millenium. Syst Biol 53: 333-342.
11. Kingdon JA. 1997. The Kingdon field guide to African mammals. San Diego: Academic Press. 465p.
12. Kolaczkowski B, Thornton JW. 2004. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution heterogeneous. Nature 431:980-984.
13. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. 2004. MEGA 3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5:150-163.
14. Martin RD. 1972. Adaptive radiation and behaviour of the Malagasy lemurs. Phil Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 264:295-352.
15. Masters JC, Rayner RJ, Ludewick H, Zimmermann E, Molez-Verriere N, Vincent F, Nash LT. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among the Galaginae as indicated by erythrocytic allozymes. Primates 35: 177-190.
16. Masters JC, Brothers DJ. 2002. Lack of congruence between morphological and molecular data in reconstructing the phylogeny of the Galagonidae. Am J Phys Anthropol 117:79-93.
17. Masters JC, Anthony N, de Wit MJ, Mitchell A. 2005. Reconstructing the evolutionary history of the Lorisidae using morphological, molecular, and geological data. Am J Phys Anthropol 127:465-480.
18. Nash LT, Bearder SK, Olson TR. 1989. Synopsis of Galago species characters. Int J Primatol 10:57-80.
19. Nixon KC, Carpenter JM. 1993. On outgroups. Cladistics 9:413-426.
20. Nylander JAA. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Uppsala: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
21. Olson TR. 1979. Studies on aspects of the morphology of the genus Otolemur Coquerel, 1859. Ph.D. dissertation, University of London, London, UK. Available from: University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI; 7970038.
22. Porter CA, Page SL, Czelusniak J, Schneider H, Schneider MPC, Sampaio I, Goodman M. 1997. Phylogeny and evolution of selected primates as determined by sequences of the ε-globin locus and 5′ flanking regions. Int J Primatol 18:261-295.
23. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
24. Rasmussen DT, Nekaris KA. 1998. Evolutionary history of lorisiform primates. Folia Primatol 69(Suppl 1):250-285.
25. Roos C, Schmitz J, Zischler H. 2004. Primate jumping genes elucidate strepsirrhine phylogeny. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 10650-10654.
26. Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406-425.
27. Schwartz JH, Tattersall I. 1985. Evolutionary relationships of living lemurs and lorises (Mammalia, Primates) and their potential affinities with European Adapidae. Anthropol Pap Am Mus Nat Hist 60:1-100.
28. Schwartz JH. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of African and Asian lorisids. In: Matano S, Tuttle RH, Ishida H, Goodman M, editors. Topics in primatology. Vol. 3. Evolutionary biology, reproductive endocrinology, and virology. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press. p 65-81.
29. Scotland RW, Olmstead RG, Bennett JR. 2003. Phylogeny reconstruction: the role of morphology. Syst Biol 52:539-548.
30. Sober E. 2004. The contest between parsimony and likelihood. Syst Biol 53:644-653.
31. Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
32. Tamura K, Nei M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of the mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 7: 512-526.
33. Thornton JW, Kolaczkowski B. 2005. No magic pill for phylogenetic error. Trends Genet 21:310-311.
34. Wiens JJ. 2004. The role of morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction. Syst Biol 53: 653-661.
35. Yoder AD. 1994. Relative position of the Cheirogaleidae in strepsirhine phylogeny: a comparison of morphological and molecular methods and results. Am J Phys Anthropol 94:25-46.
36. Yoder AD, Irwin JA, Payseur BA. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Syst Biol 50: 408-424.
37. Zimmermann E. 1990. Differentiation of vocalizations in bushbabies (Galaginae, Prosimiae, Primates) and the significance for assessing phylogenetic relationships. Z Zool Syst Evol Forsch 28:217-239.