The evolution of social and reproductive monogamy in Peromyscus: Evidence from Peromyscus californicus (the California mouse)

Monogamy: Mating Strategies and Partnerships in Birds, Humans and Other Mammals

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 81-92

  Ribble, David O ^a  

^a TRINITY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923477346     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139087247.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (93)

1. Agrell, J., Wolff, J. O. & Ylonen, H. (1998). Counter-strategies to infanticide inmammals, costs and consequences. Oikos, 83, 507-17.
2. Amadon, D. (1959). The significance of sexual differences in size among birds. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 103, 531-6.
3. Barlow, G. W. (1988). Monogamy in relation to resources. In The Ecology of Social Behaviour, ed. C.N. Slobodchikoff, pp. 55-79. San Diego, California: Academic Press.
4. Birdsall, D. A. & Nash, D. (1973). Occurrence of successful multiple insemination of females in natural populations of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Evolution, 27, 106-10.
5. Birkhead, T. R. &Møller, A. P. (1996). Monogamy and sperm competition in birds. In Partnerships in Birds: The Study of Monogamy, ed. J. M. Black, pp. 323-43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Black, J. M. (2001). Fitness consequences of long-term pair bonds in barnacle geese: monogamy in the extreme. Behavioural Ecology, 12, 640-5.
7. Blair, W. F. (1951). Population structure, social behavior, and environmental relations in a natural population of the beachmouse. Contributions from the Laboratory of Vertebrate Biology, University of Michigan, 48, 1-47.
8. Bowers, M. A. & Smith, H. D. (1979). Differential habitat utilization by sexes of the deermouse, Peromyscus maniculatus. Ecology, 60, 869-75.
9. Bradley, R. D., Tiemann-Boege, I., Kilpatrick, C. W. & Schmidly, D. J. (2000). Taxonomic status of Peromyscus boylii sacarensis, inferences from DNA sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome-B gene. Journal of Mammalogy, 81, 875-84.
10. Cantoni, D. & Brown, R. E. (1997). Paternal investment and reproductive success in the California mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Animal Behaviour, 54, 377-86.
11. Carleton, M. D. (1989). Systematics and evolution. In Advances in the Study of Peromyscus (Rodentia), ed. G. L. J. Kirkland & J. N. Layne, pp. 7-141. Lubbock, Texas: Texas Tech University Press.
12. Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Harvey, P. H. (1983). The functional significance of variation in body size among mammals. In Advances in the Study of Mammalian Behavior, ed. J. F. Eisenberg & D. G. Kleiman, pp. 632-63. Special Publication of the American Society of Mammalogists, No. 7. Shippensburg, Pennsylvania.
13. Dewsbury, D. A. (1981). An exercise in the prediction of monogamy in the field from laboratory data on 42 species of Muroid rodents. Biologist, 63, 138-62.
14. Dudley, D. (1974a). Contributions of paternal care to the growth and development of the young in Peromyscus californicus. Behavioral Biology, 11, 155-66.
15. Dudley, D. (1974b). Paternal behavior in the California mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Behavioral Biology, 11, 247- 52.
16. Duquette, L. S. & Millar, J. S. (1995). The effect of supplemental food on life-history traits and demography of a tropical mouse Peromyscus mexicanus. Journal of Animal Ecology, 64, 348-60.
17. Eisenberg, J. F. (1963). The intraspecific behavior of some cricetine rodents of the genus Peromyscus. American Midland Naturalist, 69, 240-6.
18. Eisenberg, J. F. (1968). Behavior patterns. Special Publications, American Society of Mammalogy, 2, 451-95.
19. Foltz, D. W. (1981). Genetic evidence for long-term monogamy in a small rodent, Peromyscus polionotus. American Naturalist, 117, 665-75.
20. Frank, D. H. & Heske, E. J. (1992). Seasonal changes in space use patterns in the southern grasshopper mouse Onychomys torridus torridus. Journal of Mammalogy, 73, 292-8.
21. Greenwood, P. J. (1980). Mating systems, philopatry, and dispersal in birds and mammals. Animal Behaviour, 28, 1140-62.
22. Greenwood, P. J. (1983). Mating systems and the evolutionary consequences of dispersal. In The Ecology of Animal Movement, ed. I. R. Swingland & P. J. Greenwood, pp. 116-31. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
23. Gubernick, D. J. & Addington, R. L. (1994). The stability of female social and mating preferences in the monogamous California mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Animal Behaviour, 47, 559-67.
24. Gubernick, D. J. & Alberts, J. R. (1987). The biparental care system of the California Mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 101, 169-77.
25. Gubernick, D. J. & Alberts, J. R. (1989). Postpartum maintenance of paternal behaviour in the biparental California mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Animal Behaviour, 37, 656-64.
26. Gubernick, D. J. & Teferi, T. (2000). Adaptive significance of male parental care in amonogamous mammal. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 267, 147-50.
27. Gubernick, D. J., Wright, S. L.&Brown R. E. (1993). The significance of father's presence for offspring survival in the monogamous California mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Animal Behaviour, 46, 539-46.
28. Haggerty, T. M., Morton, E. S. & Fleischer, R. C. (2001). Genetic monogamy in Carolina Wrens (Throthorus ludovicianus). The Auk, 118, 215-19.
29. Hall, L. S. & Morrison, M. L. (1997). Den and relocation site characteristics and home ranges of Peromyscus truei in the white mountains of California. Great Basin Naturalist, 57, 124-30.
30. Hansen, R. M. (1957). Communal litters of Peromyscus maniculatus. Journal of Mammalogy, 38, 525.
31. Hartung, T. G. & Dewsbury, D. A. (1979). Paternal behavior in six species of muroid rodents. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 26, 466-78.
32. Hatton, D.C.&Meyer, M. E. (1973). Paternal behavior in cactus mice (Peromyscus crinitus). Bulletin of the Psychonometry Society, 2, 330.
33. Heske, E. J. & Ostfeld, R. S. (1990). Sexual dimorphism in size, relative size of testes, and mating systems in North American voles. Journal of Mammalogy, 71, 510-19.
34. Horner, B. E. (1947). Paternal care of young mice of the genus Peromyscus. Journal of Mammalogy, 28, 31-6.
35. Horner, B.E.&Taylor, J.M. (1968). Growth and reproduction in the southern grasshopper mouse. Journal of Mammalogy, 49, 644-60.
36. Howard, W. E. (1949). Dispersal, amount of inbreeding, and longevity in a local population of prairie deermice on the George Reserve, Michigan. Contributions from the Laboratory of Vertebrate Biology, University of Michigan, 43, 1-50.
37. Jacquot, J. J. & Vessey, S. H. (1994). Non-offspring nursing in the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus. Animal Behaviour, 48, 1238-40.
38. Jarman, J. P. (1974). The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour, 48, 215-67.
39. Kalcounis-Rueppell, M.C. (2000). Breeding Systems, Habitat Overlap, and Activity Patterns of Monogamous and Promiscuous Mating in Peromyscus californicus and P. boylii. Ph.D. thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
40. Kaufman, D.W.&Kaufman, G. A. (1989). Population biology. In Advances in the Study of Peromyscus (Rodentia), ed. G. L. J. Kirkland & J. N. Layne, pp. 233-70. Lubbock, Texas: Texas Tech University Press.
41. Kirkland, G. L. J. & Layne, J. N. (ed.) (1989). Advances in the Study of Peromyscus (Rodentia). Lubbock, Texas:Texas Tech University Press.
42. Kleiman, D. G. (1977). Monogamy in mammals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 52, 39-69.
43. Komers, P. E. & Brotherton, P. N. M. (1997). Female space use is the best predictor of monogamy in mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 264, 1261-70.
44. König, B. & Markl, H. (1987). Maternal care in house mice: I. The weaning strategy as a means for parental manipulation of offspring quality. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 20, 1-9.
45. König, B., Riester, J. & Markl, H. (1988). Maternal care in house mice (Mus musculus): II. The energy cost of lactation as a function of litter size. Journal of Zoology, London, 216, 195-210.
46. Kurland, J. A. & Gaulin, S. J. C. (1984). The evolution of male paternal investment, effects of genetic relatedness and feeding ecology on the allocation of reproductive effort. In Primate Paternalism, ed.D.W.Taub, pp. 259-308.New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
47. Langtimm, C. A. & Dewsbury, D. A. (1991). Phylogeny and evolution of rodent copulatory behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 41, 217-25.
48. Lewis, A.W. (1972). Seasonal population changes in the cactus mouse, Peromyscus eremicus. The SouthwesternNaturalist, 17, 85-93.
49. MacMillen, R. E. (1964). Population ecology, water relations, and social behavior of a southern California semidesert rodent fauna. University of California Publications in Zoology, 71, 1-59.
50. Maddison, W. P. & Maddison, D. R. (2000). MacClade 4. Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
51. Madison, D. M. (1977). Movements and habitat use among interacting Peromyscus leucopus as revealed by radiotelemetry. Canadian Field Naturalist, 91, 273-81.
52. Maynard Smith, J. (1977). Parental investment, a prospective analysis. Animal Behaviour, 25, 1-9.
53. Merritt, J. F. (1974). Factors influencing the local distribution of Peromyscus californicus in northern California. Journal of Mammalogy, 55, 102-14.
54. Merritt, J. F. (1978). Peromyscus californicus. Mammalian Species, 85, 1-6.
55. Metzgar, L. H. (1971). Behavioral population regulation in the woodmouse, Peromyscus leucopus. American Midland Naturalist, 86, 434-48.
56. Millar, J. S. (1989). Reproduction and development. In Advances in the Study of Peromyscus (Rodentia), ed.G. L. J. Kirkland & J. N. Layne, pp. 169-231. Lubbock, Texas: Texas Tech University Press.
57. Millar, J. S. & Derrickson, E. M. (1992). Group nesting in Peromyscus maniculatus. Journal of Mammalogy, 73, 403-7.
58. Millar, J. S.&Innes, D.G.L. (1983). Demographic and life cycle characteristics of montane deer mice. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 61, 574-85.
59. Nelson, R. J., Gubernick, D. J. & Blom, J. M. C. (1995). Influence of photoperiod, green food, and water availability on reproduction in male California mice (Peromyscus californicus). Physiology and Behavior, 57, 1175-80.
60. Ostfeld, R. S. (1990). The ecology of territoriality in small mammals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 411-15.
61. Quillfeldt, P., Schmoll, T., Peter, H.-U., Epplen, J. T. & Lubjuhn, Y. (2001). Genetic monogamy in Wilson's Storm-Petrel. The Auk, 118, 242-8.
62. Ribble, D. O. (1990). Population and Social Dynamics of the California mouse (Peromyscus californicus). Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
63. Ribble, D. O. (1991). The monogamous mating system of Peromyscus californicus as revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 29, 161-6.
64. Ribble, D. O. (1992a). Dispersal in a monogamous rodent, Peromyscus californicus. Ecology, 73, 859-66.
65. Ribble, D. O. (1992b). Lifetime reproductive success and its correlates in the monogamous rodent, Peromyscus californicus. Journal of Animal Ecology, 61, 457-68.
66. Ribble, D.O.&Millar, J.S. (1996). Themating system of northern populations of Peromyscus maniculatus as revealed by radiotelemetry and DNA fingerprinting. Ecoscience, 3, 423-8.
67. Ribble, D. O. & Salvioni, M. (1990). Social organization and nest co-occupancy in Peromyscus californicus, a monogamous rodent. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 26, 9-15.
68. Ribble, D. O. & Stanley, S. (1998). Home ranges and social organization of syntopic Peromyscus boylii and P. truei. Journal of Mammalogy, 79, 932-41.
69. Ribble, D. O., Wurtz, A. E., McConnell, E. K., Buegge, J. J. & Welch, K. C. J. (2002). A comparison of home ranges of two species of Peromyscus using trapping and radiotelemetry data. Journal of Mammalogy, 83, 260-6.
70. Rickart, E. A. (1977). Reproduction, growth and development in two species of cloud forest Peromyscus from southern Mexico. The University of Kansas Natural History Museum Occasional Papers, 67, 1-22.
71. Rickart, E. A. & Robertson, P. B. (1985). Peromyscus melanocarpus. Mammalian Species, 241, 1-3.
72. Rogers, D. S. & Engstrom, M. D. (1992). Evolutionary implications of allozymic variation in tropical Peromyscus of the mexicanus species group. Journal of Mammalogy, 73, 55-69.
73. Sauer, J. R. & Slade, N. A. (1987). Size-based demography of vertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18, 71-90.
74. Scheibe, J. S. & O'Farrell, J. O. (1995). Habitat dynamics in Peromyscus truei, eclectic females, density dependence, or reproductive constraints? Journal of Mammalogy, 76, 368-75.
75. Schug, M. D., Vessey, S. H. & Underwood, E. M. (1992). Paternal behavior in a natural population of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus). American Midland Naturalist, 127, 373-80.
76. Smith, M.H. (1966). TheEvolutionary Significance of Certain Behavioral, Physiological, and Morphological Adaptations of the Old-field Mouse, Peromyscus polionotus. Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida.
77. Stangl, F. B., Jr & Baker, R. J. (1984). Evolutionary relationships in Peromyscus, congruence in chromosomal, genic, and classical data sets. Journal of Mammalogy, 65, 643-54.
78. Stapp, P. (1999). Size and habitat characteristics of home ranges of northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster). The Southwestern Naturalist, 44, 101-5.
79. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, ed. B. Campbell, pp. 136-79. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
80. Wiley, R. H. (1974). Evolution of social organization and life-history patterns among grouse. Quarterly Review of Biology, 49, 201-27.
81. Wittenberger, J. F. & Tilson, R. L. (1980). The evolution of monogamy, hypotheses and evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11, 197-232.
82. Wolff, J. O. (1985). The effects of density, food, and interspecific interference on home range size in Peromyscus leucopus and Peromyscus maniculatus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 63, 2657-62.
83. Wolff, J. O. (1989). Social behavior. In Advances in the Study of Peromyscus (Rodentia), ed. G. L. J. Kirkland & J. N. Layne, pp. 271-91. Lubbock, Texas: Texas Tech University Press.
84. Wolff, J. O. (1993). Why are female small mammals territorial? Oikos, 68, 364-70.
85. Wolff, J. O. (1994). Reproductive success of solitary and communally nesting white-footed mice and deer mice. Behavioral Ecology, 5, 206-9.
86. Wolff, J. O. & Cicirello, D. M. (1989). Field evidence for sexual selection and resource competition infanticide in white-footed mice. Animal Behaviour, 38, 637-42.
87. Wolff, J. O. & Cicirello, D. M. (1990). Mobility versus territoriality, alternative reproductive strategies in white-footed mice. Animal Behaviour, 39, 1222-24.
88. Wolff, J. O. & Cicirello, D. M. (1991). Comparative paternal and infanticidal behavior of sympatric white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus noveboracensis) and deermice (P. maniculatus nubiterrae). Behavioral Ecology, 2, 38-45.
89. Wolff, J. O. & Peterson, J. A. (1998). An offspring-defense hypothesis for territoriality in female mammals. Ethology, Ecology and Evolution, 10, 227-39.
90. Xia, X. & Millar, J. S. (1986). Sex-related dispersion of breeding deer mice in theKananaskisValley, Alberta. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 64, 933-6.
91. Xia, X. & Millar, J. S. (1988). Paternal behavior by Peromyscus leucopus in enclosures. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 66, 1184-7.
92. Xia, X. & Millar, J. S. (1989). Dispersion of adult male Peromyscus leucopus in relation to female reproductive status. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 67, 1047-52.
93. Xia, X. & Millar, J. S. (1991). Genetic evidence of promiscuity inPeromyscus leucopus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 28, 171-8.