Online reciprocal peer tutoring for the improvement of linguistic abilities in Spanish and English;Tutoría entre iguales recíproca y virtual para la mejora de habilidades lingüísticas en español e inglés

Infancia y Aprendizaje

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 209-222

  Duran, David ^a   Blanch, Sílvia ^a   Thurston, Allen ^b   Topping, Y Keith ^c  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cooperative learning; Information and communication technology (ICT) and peer tutoring; Learning languages; Peer learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954350299     PISSN: 02103702     EISSN: 15784126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1174/021037010791114571     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. BARBERÀ, E. (2008). Aprender e-learning. Barcelona: Paidós.
2. CALLISON, D. & LAMB, A. (2004). Key Words in Instruction: audience analysis. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 21 (1), 34-39.
3. CASSANY, D. (2002). Reparar la escritura, didáctica de la corrección de lo escrito. Barcelona: Graó.
4. CATALÀ, G., COMES, G. & RENOM, J. (2001). Evaluación de la comprensión lectora. Barcelona: Graó.
5. CHAPMAN, E. S. (1998). Key considerations in the design and implementation of effective peer- assisted learning programmes. En K. J. Topping & S. Ehly (Eds.), Peer-assisted learning (pp. 67- 84). Mahwah, NY: Erlbaum.
6. COHEN, P., KULIK, J. & KULIK, C. (1982). Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: a Meta-analysis of Findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19 (2), 237-248.
7. COLL, C. & MARTÍ, E. (2001). La educación escolar ante las nuevas tecnologías de la información y de la comunicación. En C. Coll, J. Palacios & A. Marchesi (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación. 2. Psicología de la educación escolar (pp. 623-653). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
8. CORTESSE, C. (2005). Learning trough Teaching. Management Learning, 36 (1), 87-15.
9. CURRICULUM, EVALUATION ANDMANAGEMENT CENTRE (2004). Performance indicators in primary schools primary seven assessment. Durham, UK: Curriculum, Evaluation and Management Centre.
10. DAMON, W. & PHELPS, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 9-19.
11. DEKHINET, R., TOPPING, K. J., DURAN, D. & BLANCH. S. (2008). Let Me Learn with my peers online!: foreign language learning through reciprocal peer tutoring. Innovate. Journal of Online Education. [Revista electrónica], 4 (3). En http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view = article&id = 479 [Consulta: 16 de Marzo de 2009]
12. DURAN, D. (Ed.) (2006). Tutoría entre iguales: algunas prácticas. Monográfico de Aula de Innovación Educativa, 153-154, 7-39.
13. DURAN, D. & MONEREO, C. (2005). Styles and sequence of cooperative interaction in fixed and reciprocal peer tutoring. Learning & Instruction, 15, 179-199.
14. DURAN, D. & VIDAL, V. (2004). Tutoría entre iguales: de la teoría a la práctica. Barcelona: Graó.
15. FANTUZZO, J. & GINSBURG-BLOCK, M. (1998). Reciprocal Peer Tutoring: Developing and testing effective peer collaborations for elementary school students. En K. J. Topping & S. Ehly (Eds.), Peer-assisted learning (pp.121-145). Mahwah, NY: Erlbaum.
16. FANTUZZO, J. W., POLITE, K. & GRAYSON, N. (1990). An Evaluation of reciprocal peer tutoring across elementary school settings. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 309-323.
17. FANTUZZO, J. W., KING, A. M. & HELLER, L. R. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: a component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 331-339.
18. FLANIGAN, B. O. (1991). Peer tutoring and second language acquisition in the elementary school. Applied Linguistics, 12 (2), 142-158.
19. FUCHS, L. S., FUCHS, D., BENTZ, J., PHILLIPS, N. B. & HAMLETT, C. L. (1994). The nature of students interactions during peer tutoring with and without prior training experience. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 75-103.
20. GÓMEZ, L. (2002). Gramática, didáctica del español. Madrid: Ediciones SM.
21. GOODLAD, S. & HIST, B. (1989). Peer tutoring: A guide to learning by teaching. Londres: K. Page.
22. GREENWOOD, C. R., CARTA, J. & KAMPS, D. (1990). Teacher-mediated Versus Peer-mediated instruction: A review of advantages and disadvantages. En H. C. Foot, M. J. Morgan & R. H. Shute (Eds.), Children helping children (pp. 177-205). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
23. GRIFFIN, M. & GRIFFIN, B. (1998). An Investigation of the Effects of reciprocal Peer Tutoring in Achievement, Self-Efficacy, and Test anxiety. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 298-311.
24. GYANANI, T. C. & PAHUJA, P. (1995). Effects of peer tutoring on abilities and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 469-475.
25. a ed.). México: McGraw-Hill.
26. HICKEY, T. M. (2007). Children's language networks in minority language immersion: What goes in may not come out. Language and Education, 21 (1), 46-65.
27. LITTLE, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublín: Authentik.
28. LITTLE, D., USHIODA, E., APPEL, M. C., MORAN, J., O'ROURKE, B. & SCHWIENHORST, K. (1999). Evaluating tandem language learning by e-mail: Report on a bilateral project. CLCS Occasional Paper, 55. [en línea] www.eric.ed.gov [Consulta: 4 de Diciembre de 2007].
29. MCLUCKIE, J. & TOPPING, K. J. (2004). Transferable Skills for Online Peer Learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29 (5), 563-584.
30. MELERO, M.A. & FERNÁNDEZ, P. (1995). El aprendizaje entre iguales: el estado de la cuestión en Estados Unidos. En P. Fernández & M. A. Melero (Eds.), La interacción social en contextos Educativos (pp. 35-98). Madrid: S. XXI.
31. MILIAN, M. & CAMPS, A. (2006). El razonamiento metalingüístico en el marco de las secuencias didácticas de gramática. En A. Camps (Ed.), Diálogo e investigación en las aulas. Investigaciones en didáctica de la lengua (pp. 25-54). Barcelona: Graó.
32. MOMINÓ, J. M., SIGALÉS, C. & MENESES, J. (2008). La escuela en la sociedad red. Internet en la educación primaria y secundaria. Barcelona: Ariel.
33. MONEREO, C. (Ed.) (2005). Internet y competencias básicas. Aprender a colaborar, a comunicarse, a participar, a aprender. Barcelona: Graó.
34. PERSON, N. K. & GRAESSER, A. G. (1999). Evolution of discourse during cross-age tutoring. En A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 69-86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. PELL, T. & JARVIS, T. (2001). Developing attitude to science scales for use with children of ages from five to eleven years. International Journal of Science Education, 23 (8), 847-862.
36. ROHRBECK, C.A., GINSBURGH-BLOCK, M. D., FANTUZZO & J .W. & MILLER, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted Learning: interventions with elementary school students: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95 (2), 240-257.
37. SHANG, H. (2005). Email dialogue journaling: attitudes and impact on L2 reading performance. Educational Studies, 31 (2), 197-212.
38. TOPPING, K. J. (2000). Tutoring by Peers, Family and Volunteers. Ginebra: UNESCO.
39. TOPPING, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25 (6), 631-645.
40. TOPPING, K. J. & EHLY, S. (Eds.) (1998). Peer-assisted learning. Mahwah, NJ & Londres, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. WELLS, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry. Cambridge: University of Cambridge [Trad. cast. de G. Sánchez: Indagación dialógica. Barcelona: Paidós, 2001].
42. WOLFE-QUINTERO, K., INAGAKI, S. & KIM, H. Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity (Technical Report Number 17). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre.