Planning in sentence production: Evidence for the phrase as a default planning scope

Cognition

Volumn 116, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 177-192

  Martin, Randi C ^a   Crowther, Jason E ^a   Knight, Meredith ^a   Tamborello, Franklin P ^a   Yang, Chin Lung ^b  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Language production; Scope of planning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; LATENT PERIOD; NORMAL HUMAN; PLANNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; VOICE ONSET TIME; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MEMORY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPEECH; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954315636     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.04.010     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alario F.-X., Caramazza A. The production of determiners: Evidence from French. Cognition 2002, 82:179-223.
2. Alario F.-X., Costa A., Caramazza A. Frequency effects in noun phrase production: Implications for models of lexical access. Language and Cognitive Processes 2002, 17:299-319.
3. Allum P.H., Wheeldon L.R. Planning scope in spoken sentence production: The role of grammatical units. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:791-810.
4. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., Gulikers L. The CELEX lexical database (release 2) [CD-ROM] 1995, Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
5. Bock K. Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review 1982, 89:1-47.
6. Caramazza A., Costa A., Miozzo M., Bi Y. Specific-word frequency effect: Implications for the representation of homophones in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:1430-1450.
7. Catrambone R. The subgoal learning model: Creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1998, 127:355-376.
8. Chang F., Dell G.S., Bock K. Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review 2006, 113:234-272.
9. Cohen J.D., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., Provost J. PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 1993, 25:257-271.
10. Costa A., Caramazza A. The production of noun phrases in English and Spanish: Implications for the scope of phonological encoding in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:178-198.
11. Crowther, J. E. (2009). Mechanisms and scope of planning in language production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rice University.
12. Damian M.F., Dumay N. Time pressure and phonological advance planning in production. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:195-209.
13. Ferreira F. Syntax in language production: An approach use tree-adjoining grammars. Aspects of language production 2000, 291-330. Psychology Press, London. L. Wheeldon (Ed.).
14. Ferreira F., Swets B. How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:57-84.
15. Ford M. Sentence planning units: Implications for the speaker's representation of meaningful relations underlying sentences. The mental representation of grammatical relations 1982, 797-827. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. J. Bresnan (Ed.).
16. Freedman M.L., Martin R.C. Dissociable components of short-term memory and their relation to long-term learning. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2001, 18:193-226.
17. Goldman-Eisler F. Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech 1968, Academic Press, New York.
18. Griffin Z. Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition 2001, 82:B1-14.
19. Griffin Z. A reversed word length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:603-609.
20. Griffin Z. Why look? Reasons for eye movements related to language production. The integration of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world 2004, 213-247. Psychology Press, New York. J.M. Henderson, F. Ferreira (Eds.).
21. Griffin Z., Bock K. What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science 2000, 11:274-279.
22. Griffin Z.M., Ferreira V.S. Properties of spoken language production. Handbook of psycholinguistics 2006, 21-59. Elsevier, London. 2nd ed. M.J. Traxler, M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds.).
23. Hanten G., Martin R.C. Contributions of phonological and semantic short-term memory to sentence processing: Evidence from two cases of closed head injury in children. Journal of Memory and Language 2000, 43:335-361.
24. Jescheniak J.D., Levelt W.J.M. Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:824-843.
25. Jescheniak J.D., Meyer A.S., Levelt W.J.M. Specific-word frequency is not all that counts in speech production: Comments on Caramazza, Costa, et al. (2001) and new experimental data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:432-438.
26. Kempen G., Huijbers P. The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: Indirect election of words. Cognition 1983, 14:185-209.
27. Levelt W.J.M., Meyer A.S. Word for word: Multiple lexical access in speech production. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2000, 12:433-452.
28. Lindsley J.R. Producing simple utterances: Details of the planning process. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1976, 5:331-354.
29. Martin N., Saffran E.M. Language and auditory-verbal short term memory impairments: Evidence for common underlying processes. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1997, 14:641-682.
30. Martin R.C., Freedman M.L. Short-term retention of lexical-semantic representations: Implications for speech production. Memory 2001, 9:261-280.
31. Martin R.C., He T. Semantic short-term memory deficit and language processing: A replication. Brain and Language 2004, 89:76-82.
32. Martin R.C., Lesch M.F., Bartha M.C. Independence of input and output phonology in word processing and short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 41:3-29.
33. Martin R.C., Miller M., Vu H. Lexical-semantic retention and speech production: Further evidence from normal and brain-damaged participants for a phrasal scope of planning. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2004, 21:625-644.
34. Martin R.C., Romani C. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension: A multiple-components view. Neuropsychology 1994, 8:506-523.
35. Martin R.C., Shelton J.R., Yaffee L.S. Language processing and working memory: Neuropsychological evidence for separate phonological and semantic capacities. Journal of Memory and Language 1994, 33:83-111.
36. Meyer A.S., Belke E., Häcker C., Mortensen L. Use of word length information in utterance planning. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:210-231.
37. Meyer A.S., Ouellet M., Häcker C. Parallel processing of objects in a naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:982-987.
38. Meyer A.S., Sleiderink A., Levelt W. Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition 1998, 66:25-33.
39. Miozzo M., Caramazza A. The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25:907-922.
40. Morgan J.L., Meyer A.S. Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:428-442.
41. Morgan J.L., Meyer A.S. Processing of extrafoveal objects during multi-object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:428-442.
42. Morsella E., Miozzo M. Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28:555-563.
43. Navarrete E., Costa A. Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 53:359-377.
44. Oppermann F., Jescheniak J.D., Schriefers H. Conceptual coherence affects phonological activation of context objects during object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:587-601.
45. Roach, A., Schwartz, M., Martin, N., Grewal, R., Brecher, A. (1996). The Philadelphia naming task: Scoring and rationale. Clinical Aphasiology (Vol. 24, pp. 121-134). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
46. Rosenbaum D.A. Human motor control 2010, Academic Press/Elsevier, San Diego, CA. 2nd ed.
47. Rosenbaum D.A., Carlson R.A., Gilmore R.O. The acquisition of intellectual and perceptual-motor skills. Annual Review of Psychology 2001, 52:453-470.
48. Rosenbaum D.A., Kenny S.B., Derr M.A. Hierarchial control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1983, 9:86-102.
49. Schriefers H. Lexical access in the production of noun phrases. Cognition 1992, 45:33-54.
50. Schriefers H., de Ruiter J.P., Steigerwald M. Parallelism in the production of noun phrases: Experiments and reaction time models. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1999, 25:702-720.
51. Smith M., Wheeldon L. High level processing scope in spoken sentence production. Cognition 1999, 73:205-246.
52. Smith M., Wheeldon L. Syntactic priming in spoken sentence production-An online study. Cognition 2001, 78:123-164.
53. Snodgrass J.G., Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory 1980, 6:174-215.
54. Spieler D.H., Griffin Z.M. The influence of age on the time course of word preparation in multiword utterances. Language and Cognitive Processes 2006, 21:291-321.
55. Szekely A., Jacobsen T., D'Amico S., Devescovi A., Andonova E., Herron D., et al. A new on-line resource for psycholinguistics studies. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 51:247-250.
56. van der Meulen, F. F., Meyer, A. S. (2000). Coordination of eye gaze and speech in sentence production. Poster presented at the 41st annual meeting of the psychonomic society, New Orleans, LA, November.
57. Wheeldon L.R., Lahiri A. Prosodic units in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language 1997, 37:356-381.
58. Wheeldon L.R., Lahiri A. The minimal unit of phonological encoding: Prosodic or lexical. Cognition 2002, 85:B31-B41.