Bioethanol from the Portuguese forest residue Pterospartum tridentatum - An evaluation of pretreatment strategy for enzymatic saccharification and sugars fermentation

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 101, Issue 20, 2010, Pages 7797-7803

  Ferreira, S ^a   Gil, N ^a   Queiroz, J A ^a   Duarte, A P ^a   Domingues, F C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BEIRA INTERIOR   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Acid diluted pretreatment; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Fermentability; Lignocellulosic ethanol; Pterospartum tridentatum

Indexed keywords

BIO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION; CURRENT ENERGY; DRY BIOMASS; ENZYMATIC SACCHARIFICATION; ETHANOL YIELD; FERMENTABILITY; FOREST RESIDUE; GLUCOSE YIELDS; LIGNOCELLULOSIC ETHANOL; LIGNOCELLULOSIC MATERIAL; LIQUID FRACTION; OPTIMAL CONDITIONS; PRE-TREATMENT; PTEROSPARTUM TRIDENTATUM; REDUCING SUGARS;

ACIDS; BIOETHANOL; DETOXIFICATION; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FOSSIL FUELS; GLUCOSE; OPTIMIZATION; SACCHARIFICATION; SUGAR (SUCROSE); SULFURIC ACID;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS;

ALCOHOL; BIOETHANOL; CELLULOSE; GLUCOSE; SUGAR; SULFURIC ACID; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; BIOFUEL; CELLULOSE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FOSSIL FUEL; LEGUME; LIGNIN; PHYTOMASS; SUGAR; SULFURIC ACID;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; FERMENTATION; FOREST; HYDROLYSIS; NONHUMAN; PICHIA STIPITIS; PLANT RESIDUE; PORTUGAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PTEROSPARTUM TRIDENTATUM; SACCHARIFICATION; SHRUB;

CARBOHYDRATES; CELLULASE; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; HYDROLYSIS; PORTUGAL;

ACIDS; ENZYMOLYSIS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FOSSIL FUELS; GLUCOSE; LIGNOCELLULOSE; OPTIMIZATION; PRETREATMENT; SACCHARIFICATION; SUGAR; SULFURIC ACID;

PTEROSPARTUM TRIDENTATUM;

EID: 77954309619     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.038     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Balat M., Balat H., Oz C. Progress in bioethanol processing. Prog. Energy Combust. 2008, 34:551-573.
2. Brandberg T., Sanandaji N., Gustafsson L., Franzen C.J. Continuous fermentation of undetoxified dilute acid lignocellulose hydrolysate by Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 96581 using cell recirculation. Biotechnol. Prog. 2005, 21:1093-1101.
3. Canettieri E.V., de Moraes Rocha G.J., de Carvalho J.A., de Almeida e Silva J.B. Optimization of acid hydrolysis from the hemicellulosic fraction of Eucalyptus grandis residue using response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98:422-428.
4. CELPA, 2007. Associação da Indústria Papeleira. Statistics Reports. , 2008 (accessed 19.01.2009). http://www.celpa.pt/images/pdf/art209_pt_be_2007.pdf.
5. Chang V.S., Holtzapple M.T. Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2000, 84-86:5-37.
6. Esteban L.S., Ciria P., Carrasco J.E. An assessment of relevant methodological elements and criteria for surveying sustainable agricultural and forestry biomass byproducts for energy purposes. BioResources 2008, 3:910-928.
7. Esteghlalian A., Hashimoto A.G., Fenske J.J., Penner M.H. Modeling and optimization of the dilute-sulfuric-acid pretreatment of corn stover, poplar and switchgrass. Bioresour. Technol. 1997, 59:129-136.
8. Ferreira S., Duarte A.P., Ribeiro M.H.L., Queiroz J.A., Domingues F.C. Response surface optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of Cistus ladanifer and Cytisus striatus for bioethanol production. Biochem. Eng. J. 2009, 45:192-200.
9. Galbe M., Zacchi G. A review of the production of ethanol from softwood. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 59:618-628.
10. Galbe M., Zacchi G. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials for efficient bioethanol production. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2007, 108:41-65.
11. Gupta R., Sharma K.K., Kuhad R.C. Separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) of Prosopis juliflora, a woody substrate, for the production of cellulosic ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis-NCIM 3498. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:1214-1220.
12. Hahn-Hagerdal B., Galbe M., Gorwa-Grauslund M.F., Liden G., Zacchi G. Bio-ethanol - the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. Trends Biotechnol. 2006, 24:549-556.
13. Hari Krishna S., Chowdary G.V. Optimization of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation for the production of ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48:1971-1976.
14. Hendriks A.T.W.M., Zeeman G. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:10-18.
15. Kim S., Holtzapple M.T. Effect of structural features on enzyme digestibility of corn stover. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97:583-591.
16. Kim J.K., Oh B.R., Shin H.J., Eom C.Y., Kim S.W. Statistical optimization of enzymatic saccharification and ethanol fermentation using food waste. Process Biochem. 2008, 43:1308-1312.
17. Lu X.B., Zhang Y.M., Yang J., Liang Y. Enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover after pretreatment with dilute sulfuric acid. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2007, 30:938-944.
18. Lynd L.R. Overview and evaluation of fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass: technology, economics, the environment, and policy. Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 1996, 21:403-465.
19. Marques S., Alves L., Roseiro J.C., Girio F.M. Conversion of recycled paper sludge to ethanol by SHF and SSF using Pichia stipitis. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32:400-406.
20. Martin C., Galbe M., Nilvebrant N.O., Jonsson L.J. Comparison of the fermentability of enzymatic hydrolyzates of sugarcane bagasse pretreated by steam explosion using different impregnating agents. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2002, 98:699-716.
21. Miller G.L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 1959, 31:426-428.
22. Montgomery D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments 2001, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. fifth ed.
23. Mosier N., Wyman C., Dale B., Elander R., Lee Y.Y., Holtzapple M., Ladisch M. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96:673-686.
24. Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C. Response Surface Methodology, Process and Product Optimisation using Designed Experiments 2002, Wiley, New York. second ed.
25. NREL, 2008. Standard Biomass Analytical Procedures. Laboratory Analytical Procedure National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA.
26. Rahman S.H., Choudhury J.P., Ahmad A.L., Kamaruddin A.H. Optimization studies on acid hydrolysis of oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber for production of xylose. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98:554-559.
27. Rego F., Godinho-Ferreira P., Uva J.S., Cunha J. Combination of structural and compositional factors for describing forest types using national forest inventory data. Monitoring and indicators of forest biodiversity in Europe: from ideas to operationality. EFI Proc. 2004, 51:153-162.
28. Sanchez G., Pilcher L., Roslander C., Modig T., Galbe M., Liden G. Dilute-acid hydrolysis for fermentation of the Bolivian straw material Paja Brava. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 93:249-256.
29. Silverstein R.A., Chen Y., Sharma-Shivappa R.R., Boyette M.D., Osborne J. A comparison of chemical pretreatment methods for improving saccharification of cotton stalks. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98:3000-3011.
30. 4 impregnation for ethanol production. Biomass Bioenergy 2003, 24:475-486.
31. Sun Y., Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 83:1-11.
32. Sun Y., Cheng J.J. Dilute acid pretreatment of rye straw and bermudagrass for ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96:1599-1606.
33. Zhou J., Wang Y.H., Chu J., Luo L.Z., Zhuang Y.P., Zhang S.L. Optimization of cellulase mixture for efficient hydrolysis of steam-exploded corn stover by statistically designed experiments. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 10:819-825.