A monitoring and evaluation scheme for an ICT-supported education program in schools

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 166-179

  Rodríguez, Patricio ^a   Nussbaum, Miguel ^a   López, Ximena ^b   Sepúlveda, Marcos ^a  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Adoption; Collaborative learning; Education; ICT; Monitoring and evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954280989     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Agodini, R., Dynarski, M., Honey, M., & Levin, D. (2003). The Effectiveness of Educational Technology: Issues and Recommendations for the National Study. Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. Retrieved March 25, 2009 from http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/PDFs/edtechrec.pdf.
2. Batchelor, S., & Norrish, P. (2005). Framework for the Assessment of ICT Pilot Projects. InfoDev. Retrieved March 25, 2009 from http://www.infodev.org/en/Document.4.pdf.
3. Bustos, H., & Nussbaum, M. (2009). An experimental study of the inclusion of technology in higher education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 17(1), 100-107.
4. Campuzano, L., Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., & Rall, K. (2009). Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings From Two Student Cohorts (NCEE 2009-4041). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved August 5, 2009 from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20094041/pdf/20094041.pdf.
5. Castro, C. (2004). Are new technologies better technologies? For whom? In D. Chapman, & L. Mählck (Eds.), Adapting technology for school improvement: a global perspective (pp. 39-54). International Institute for Educational Planning - UNESCO.
6. Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
7. Condie, R., & Munro, B. (2007). The Impact of ICT in schools a landscape review. DfES Publications. Retrieved March 25, 2009 from http://publications.becta.org.uk/download.cfm?resID=28221.
8. Conlon, T., & Simpson, M. (2003). Silicon Valley versus Silicon Glen: the impact of computers upon teaching and learning: a comparative study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 137-150.
9. Cortez, C., Nussbaum, M., López, X., Rodríguez, P., Santelices, R., Rosas, R., et al. (2005). Teachers' support with ad-hoc collaborative networks. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 171-180.
10. Cox, M., & Marshall, G. (2007). Effects of ICT: Do we know what we should know? Education and Information Technologies, 12(2), 59-70.
11. Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., Heaviside, S., Novak, T., Carey, N., Campuzano, L., et al. (2007). Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings from the First Student Cohort. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved March 25, 2009 from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pdf/20074005.pdf.
12. Harrison, C., Comber, C., Fischer, T., Haw, K., Lewin, C., Lunzer, E., et al. (2002). ImpaCT2: The impact of information and communication technologies on pupil learning and attainment. DfES Publications. Retrieved March 25, 2009 from http://partners.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/ImpaCT2_strand1_report.pdf.
13. Hayes, D. N. A. (2007). ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms. Computers & Education, 49(2), 385-395.
14. Kozma, R. B. (2008). Comparative Analysis of Policies for ICT in Education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 1083-1096). New York: Springer.
15. Light, D. (2008). Evaluating Educational Technology Interventions: How do we know its working? Center for Children and Technology, Education Development Center, Inc. Retrieved March 25, 2009 from http://cct.edc.org/admin/publications/speeches/Evaluating Educational Technology.pdf.
16. Martin, M., Mullis, I., Gonzalez, E., & Chrostowski, S. (2004). Findings From IEA's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. Retrieved May 5, 2009 from http://timss.bc.edu/PDF/t03_download/T03INTLSCIRPT.pdf.
17. Nussbaum, M., Alvarez, C., McFarlane, A., Gomez, F., Claro, S., & Radovic, D. (2009). Technology as small group face-to-face Collaborative Scaffolding. Computers & Education, 52(1), 147-153.
18. Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37(2), 163-178.
19. Penuel, W. R. (2005). Recommendations for Evaluation Research within Educational Innovations. Center for Technology in learning, SRI International. Retrieved March 25, 2009 from http://ctl.sri.com/publications/downloads/Rec_Eval_Research_within_Edu_Innovations.pdf.
20. Reynolds, D., Treharne, D., & Tripp, H. (2003). ICT - the hopes and the reality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 151-167.
21. Robertson, J. (2002). The ambiguous embrace: twenty years of IT (ICT) in UK primary schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 403-409.
22. Roschelle, J., Rafanan, K., Estrella, G., Nussbaum, M., & Claro, S. (2009). From Handheld Collaborative Tool to Effective Classroom Module: Embedding CSCL in a Broader Design Framework. In O'Malley, C., Suthers D., Reimann P. & Dimitracopoulou A. (Eds.) Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices - CSCL2009 Conference Proceedings, ISLS (pp. 395-403). Rhodes, June 8-13, 2009.
23. Rovai, A. P. (2003). A practical framework for evaluating online distance education programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(2), 109-124.
24. Sander, C. (1997). Planning Monitoring and Evaluation of Programme Performance. A Resource Book. Ontario: IDRC Evaluation Unit.
25. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. John Wiley and Sons.
26. Sunkel, G. (2006). Las Tecnologías de La Información y la Comunicación (TIC) en la educación en América Latina. Una exploración de indicadores. CEPAL - Políticas sociales, División de Desarrollo Social, CEPAL, Naciones Unidas.
27. Trucano, M. (2005). Knowledge Maps: ICTs in Education. ICT and Education Series. Washington, DC: infoDev/World Bank. Retrieved March 25, 2009, from http://www.infodev.org/en/Document.8.pdf.
28. Valdivia, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2009). Using Multiple Choice Questions as a Pedagogic Model for Face-to-Face CSCL. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 17(1), 89-99.
29. Wagner, D. A., Day, B., James, T., Kozma, R. B., Miller, J., & Unwin, T. (2005). Monitoring and Evaluation of ICT in Education Projects: A Handbook for Developing Countries. ICT and Education Series. Washington, DC: infoDev/World Bank.. Retrieved March, 29 2009, http:/www.infodev.org/en/Document.9.pdf.
30. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and Social Inclusion - Rethinking the Digital Divide. The MIT Press.
31. Watson, D. (1993). The ImpacT Report: an evaluation of the impact of information technology on children's achievements in primary and secondary schools. London: Department for Education and King's College Centre for Educational Studies.
32. Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers & Education, 42(3), 289-314.
33. Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2007). A conceptual framework based on Activity Theory for mobile CSCL. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 211-235.
34. Zurita, G., Nussbaum, M., & Salinas, R. (2005). Dynamic Grouping in Collaborative Learning Supported by Wireless Handhelds. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 149-161.