Balancing scientific and community interests in community-based participatory research

Accountability in Research

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 198-210

  Resnik, David B ^a   Kennedy, Caitlin E ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Community based participatory research; Data interpretation; Data sharing; Ethics; Objectivity; Openness; Publication

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DECISION MAKING; DEMOGRAPHY; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLISHING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; PUBLISHING; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 77954248042     PISSN: 08989621     EISSN: 15455815     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2010.493095     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Angell, M. (2004). The Truth about Drug Companies. New York: Random House.
2. Brandt, A. (2009). The Cigarette Century. New York: Basic Book.
3. Chen, D., Jones, L., and Gelberg, L. (2006). Ethics of clinical research within a community-academic partnered participatory framework. Ethn Dis, 16(Suppl 1):S118-135.
4. Dickert, N. and Sugarman, J. (2005). Ethical goals of community consultation in research. Am J Public Health, 95:1123-1127.
5. Emanuel, E. and Miller, F. (2001). The ethics of placebo-controlled trials-A middle ground. N Engl J Med, 345:915-919.
6. Flicker, S., Travers, R., Guta, A., McDonald S., and Meagher, A. (2007). Ethical dilemmas in community-based participatory research: Recommendations for institutional review boards. J Urban Health, 84:478-493.
7. Gilbert, S. (2006). Supplementing the traditional institutional review board with an environmental health and community review board. Environ Health Perspect, 114:1626-1629.
8. Gould, S. (1981). The Mismeasurement of Man. New York: WW Norton.
9. Haack, S. (2003). Defending Science within Reason. New York: Prometheus Books.
10. Harawa, N., Greenland, S., Bingham, T., Johnson, D., Cochran, S., Cunningham, W., Celentano, D., Koblin, B., LaLota, M., MacKellar, D., McFarland, W., Shehan, D., Stoyanoff, S., Thiede, H., Torian, L., and Valleroy, L. (2004). Associations of race/ethnicity with HIV prevalence and HIV-related behaviors among young men who have sex with men in 7 urban centers in the United States. JAIDS, 35:526-536.
11. Horowitz, C., Robinson, M., and Seifer, S. (2009). Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: are researchers prepared? Circulation, 119:2633-2642.
12. Hull, D. (1988). Science as a Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Institute of Medicine. (2009). Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Israel, B., Schulz, A., Parker, E., and Becker, A. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Ann Rev Public Health, 19:173-194.
15. Kennedy, C., Vogel, A., Goldberg-Freeman, C., Kass, N., and Farfel, M. (2009). Faculty perspectives on community-based research: "I see this still as a journey". J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 4(2):3-16.
16. Kitcher, P. (1993). The Advancement of Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Kitcher, P. (2003). Science, Truth, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Krimsky, S. (2003). Science in the Private Interest. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
19. Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Latour, B. and Wolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21. Longino, H. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
22. Marquis, D. (1983). Leaving therapy to chance. Hastings Cent Rep, 13(4):40-47.
23. Marshall, P. and Berg, J. (2006). Protecting communities in biomedical research. Am J Bioeth, 6(3):28-30.
24. Michaels, D. (2008). Doubt Is Their Product. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Miller, P. and Weijer, C. (2006). Fiduciary obligation in clinical research. J Law Med Ethics, 34:424-440.
26. Mills, E., Cooper, C., and Kanfer, I. (2005). Traditional African medicine in the treatment of HIV. Lancet Infect Dis, 5:465-467.
27. Minkler, M. (2004). Ethical challenges for the "outside" researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Educ Behav, 31:684-697.
28. National Academy of Sciences. (2009). On Being a Scientist. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29. National Cancer Institute. (2004). What is randomization? Available at: http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/learning/what-is-randomization. Last accessed December 20, 2009.
30. O'Fallon, L. and Dearry, A. (2002). Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences. Environ Health Perspect, 110(Suppl 2):155-159.
31. Pielke, R. (2007). The Honest Broker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Routledge.
33. Resnik, D. (2007). The Price of Truth. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Resnik, D. (2009a). Playing Politics with Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Resnik, D. (2009b). Environmental health research and the observer's dilemma. Environ Health Perspect, 117:1191-1194.
36. Resnik, D. and Sharp, R. (2006). Protecting third parties in human subjects research. IRB, 28(4):1-7.
37. Rhodes, S., Hergenrather, K., Bloom, F., Leichliter, J., and Montaño, J. (2009). Outcomes from a community-based, participatory lay health adviser HIV/STD prevention intervention for recently arrived immigrant Latino men in rural North Carolina. AIDS Educ Prev, 21(5 Suppl):103-108.
38. Savage, C., Xu, Y., Lee, R., Rose, B., Kappesser, M., Anthony, J. (2006). A case study in the use of community-based participatory research in public health nursing. Public Health Nurs, 23:472-478.
39. Shamoo, A. and Resnik, D. (2009). Responsible Conduct of Research. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Sharp, R. and Foster, W. (2000). Involving study populations in the review of genetic research. J Law Med Ethics, 28:41-51.
41. Sharp, R. and Foster, W. (2002). Community involvement in ethical review of genetic research: Lessons from American Indian and Alaska Native populations. Environm Health Perspect, 110(Suppl 2):145-148.
42. Shetgiri, R., Kataoka, S., Ryan, G., Askew, L., Chung, P., and Schuster, M. (2009). Risk and resilience in Latinos: A community-based participatory research study. Am J Prev Med, 37(6 Suppl 1):S217-224.
43. Wallwork, E. (2008). Ethical analysis of research partnerships with communities. Kennedy Inst Ethics J, 18:57-85.
44. Watkins, B., Shepard, P., and Corbin-Mark, C. (2009). Completing the circle: A model for effective community review of environmental health research. Am J Public Health, 99:S567-S577.
45. Weijer, C. and Emanuel, E. (2000). Protecting communities in biomedical research. Science, 289:1142-1144.