Protecting communities in biomedical research

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 28-30

  Marshall, Patricia A ^a   Berg, Jessica W ^b  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSUMER; CULTURAL FACTOR; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PUBLIC OPINION; RESEARCH ETHICS; SHORT SURVEY;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIALS; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; DISCLOSURE; ETHICAL REVIEW; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; NEGOTIATING; PUBLIC OPINION; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 33745084833     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160600685770     Document Type: Short Survey

References (10)

1. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). 2002. International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Geneva, Switzerland: CIOMS.
2. Davis, D. 2000. Groups, communities and contested identities in genetic research. Hastings Center Report 30: 38-45.
3. Dickert, N., and J. Sugarman. 2005. Ethical goals of community consultation in research. American Journal of Public Health 95(7): 1123-1127.
4. Holloway, K. F. C. 2006. Accidental communities: Race, emergency medicine, and the problem of PolyHeme®. American Journal of Bioethics 6(3): 7-17.
5. Juengst, E. T. 2004. FACE facts: Why human genetics will always provoke bioethics. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32: 252-266.
6. Marshall, P. A., and C. Rotimi. 2001. Ethical challenges in community based research. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 322(5): 259-263.
7. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2002. The ethics of research related to healthcare in developing countries. London, UK: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
8. Sharp, R. R., and M. W. Foster. 2000. Involving study populations in the review of genetic research. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28(1): 41-51.
9. The International HapMap Consortium. 2004. Integrating science and ethics in the International HapMap Project. Nature Reviews Genetics 5: 467-475.
10. Weijer, C. 1999. Protecting communities in research: Philosophical and pragmatic challenges. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8(4): 501-513.