Monoculture on the intellectual landscape: Research performance evaluation

London Review of Education

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 141-151

  Ruth, Damian ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Academic culture; Audit culture; Research assessment; Research performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954187117     PISSN: 14748460     EISSN: 14748479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14748460.2010.487332     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Alvesson, M., and H. Willmott. 1996. Making sense of management: A critical introduction. London: Sage.
2. Aronowitz, S. 2000. The knowledge factory: Dismantling the corporate university and creating true higher learning. Boston: Beacon Press.
3. Asmar, C. 1999. Is there a gendered agenda in academia? The research experience of female and male PhD graduates in Australian universities. Higher Education 38: 255-73.
4. Association of University Teachers. 2001. The gender pay gap widens 1995-2000. London: Association of University Teachers.
5. Bailyn, L. 2003. Academic careers and gender equity: Lessons learned from MIT. Gender, Work and Organization 10, no. 2: 137-53.
6. Bakker, L., J. Boston, and L. Campbell. 2006. Evaluating the performance-based research fund: Framing the debate. Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies, Victoria University Wellington.
7. Baldwin, G. 1985. Women at Monash University. Monash, Australia: Monash University.
8. Barr, J. 1999. Liberating knowledge: Research, feminism and adult education. Leicester: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education.
9. Bauman, Z. 1989. Modernity and the holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Benschop, Y., and M. Brouns. 2003. Crumbling ivory tower: Academic organizing and its gender effects. Gender, Work and Organization 10, no. 2: 194-212.
11. Bernstein, B. 1971. On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In Knowledge and control: new directions for the sociology of education, ed. M.F.D. Young, 47-69. London: Collier-MacMillan.
12. Boulton, G., and C. Lucas. 2008. What are universities for? Leuven: European League of Research Universities. www.leru.org.
13. Brett, J. 2000. Competition and collegiality. In Why universities matter, ed. T. Coady, 144-55. Australia: Allen and Unwin.
14. Bronstein, P., and L. Farnsworth. 1998. Gender differences in faculty experiences of interpersonal climate and processes for advancement. Research in Higher Education 39, no. 5: 557-85.
15. Brooks, A. 1997. Academic women. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education.
16. Burrell, G. 1996. Normal science, paradigms, metaphors, discourses and genealogies of analysis. In Handbook of organizational studies, ed. S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy, and W. Nord, 642-58. London: Sage.
17. Castleman, T., M. Allen, W. Bastalich, and P. Wright. 1995. Limited access: Women's disadvantage in higher education employment. Melbourne: National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU).
18. Chideya, N.T., C.E.M. Choikomba, A.J.C. Ogweni, and L.C. Tsikirayi. 1982. The role of the university and its future in Zimbabwe international conference papers. Harare: Harare Publishing House.
19. Clegg, S.R., and A. Ross-Smith. 2003. Revising the boundaries: Management education and learning in a postpositivist world. Academy of Management Learning and Education 2, no. 1: 85-98.
20. Coady, T. 2000. Why universities matter: A conversation about values, means and directions. St Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin.
21. Codd, J.A. 2006. The performance-based research fund and the production and commodification of knowledge. In Evaluating the performance-based research fund, ed. L. Bakker, J. Boston, L. Campbell, and R. Smyth, 215-30. Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies, Victoria University of Wellington.
22. Currie, J., P. Harris, and B. Thiele. 2000. Sacrifices in greedy universities: Are they gendered? Gender and Education 12, no. 3: 268-91.
23. Dalziel, P. 2005. Rewarding individual research excellence in the PBRF. New Zealand Journal of Tertiary Education Policy 1, no. 2: 1-9.
24. Davis, D.E., and H.S. Astin. 1990. Life cycle, career patterns and gender stratification in academe: Breaking myths and exposing truths. In Storming the tower: Women in the academic world, ed. S. Stiver Lie, and V.E. O'Leary, 89-107. London: Kogan Page.
25. Deming, W.E. 1986. Out of the crisis. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
26. Dines, E. 1993. Women in higher education management. Paris: UNESCO.
27. Duncan, G. 2004. Pouvoir et savoir: The tertiary education strategy and the will to know. New Zealand Journal of Tertiary Education Policy 1, June: 1-9. http://www.aus.ac.nz/publications/Ejournal/VollNol/VollNol.htm.
28. Eisner, E.W. 1997. The new frontier in qualitative research methodology. Qualitative Inquiry 3, no. 3: 259-73.
29. Elg, U., and K. Jonnergard. 2003. The inclusion of female PhD students in Academia: A case study of a Swedish university department. Gender, Work and Organization 10, no. 2: 154-74.
30. Ellul, J. 1973. Propaganda: The formation of men's attitudes. New York: Vintage.
31. Etzkowitz, H. 1989. Entrepreneurial science in the Academy: A case of the transformation of norms. Social Problems 36, no. l: l4-29.
32. Etzkowitz, H., C. Kemelgor, M. Neuschatz, and B. Uzzi. 1992. Athena unbound: Barriers to women in academic science and engineering. Science and Public Policy 19: 157-79.
33. Etzkowitz, H., C. Kemelgor, M. Neuschatz, and B. Uzzi. 1994. Barriers to women in academic science and engineering. In Who will do science? Educating the next generation, ed. W.J. Pearson, and I. Fechter, 68-80. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
34. Evans, M. 1995. Ivory towers: Life in the mind. In Feminist academics: Creative agents for change, ed. L. Morley, and V. Walsh, 73-85. London: Taylor and Francis.
35. Eze, E.C. 1997a. Introduction: Philosophy and the (post)colonial. In Postcolonial African philosophy: A critical reader, ed. E.C. Eze, l-22. Oxford: Blackwell.
36. Feenberg, A. l999. Questioning technology. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
37. Foucault, M. 1972. Power/knowledges: Selected interviews and other writings. New York: Pantheon Books.
38. Gamble, P., and J. Blackwell. 2001. Knowledge management A state of the art guide. London: Kogan Page.
39. Gander, J.P. 1999. Faculty gender effects on academic research and teaching. Research in Higher Education 40, no. 2: 171-84.
40. Glazer, J.S., E.M. Bensimon, and B. Townsend. 1993. Women in higher education: A feminist perspective. Needham Heights, MA: Ginn Press.
41. Haraway, D. 1989. Primate visions: Gender, race and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge.
42. Harding, S. 1993. The racial economy of science: Towards a democratic future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
43. Harris, P., B. Thiele, and J. Currie. 1998. Success, gender and academic voices. Consuming passion or selling the soul. Gender and Education 10, no. 2: 133-48.
44. Horkheimer, M., and T.W. Adorno. 1973. Dialectic of enlightenment. London: Allen Lane.
45. Hoskin, K.W., and R.H. Macve. 1988. The genesis of accountability: The West Point connections. Accounting Organizations and Society 13, no. 1: 37-73.
46. Jackson, W. 1987. Altars of unhewn stone. New York: North Point Press.
47. Knights, D., and W. Richards. 2003. Sex discrimination in UK academia. Gender, Work and Organization 10, no. 2: 137-53.
48. Kulis, S., and D. Sicotte. 2002. Women scientists in academia: Geographically constrained to big cities, college clusters, or the coasts? Research in Higher Education 43, no. 1: 1-30.
49. Kyvik, S. 1995. Productivity differences in scientific publishing. Paper presented at the IMHE Seminar on Human Resources and Staff Development, Technical University of Vienna, 10-12 May, in Vienna.
50. Lee, F.S., and S. Harley. 1998. Peer review: The research assessment exercise and the demise of non-mainstream economics. Capital and Class 66: 23-52.
51. Leonard, P. 1998. Gendering change? Management, masculinity and dynamics of incorporation. Gender and education 10, no. 1: 71-84.
52. Lie, S., and L. Malik. 1994. The gender gap in higher education: World yearbook of education. London: Kogan Page.
53. Luke, C. 1997. Quality assurance and women in higher education. Higher Education 33: 433-51.
54. Lyotard, J.F. 1984. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge.Trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi, Vol. 10. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
55. Marcuse, H. 1941. Some social implications of modern technology. In The essential Frankfurt school reader, ed. A. Arato and E. Gebhardt, 138-62. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
56. Marginson, S. 2000. Research as a managed economy: The costs. In Why universities matter, ed. T. Coady, 186-213. Australia: Allen and Unwin.
57. Martin, R. 1998. Chalk lines: The politics of work in the managed university. London: Duke University.
58. Merchant, C. 1990. The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. New York: Harper.
59. Monastersky, R. 2005. The number that's devouring science. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 14 October.
60. Moore, K.M., and M.A.D. Sagaria. 1991. The situation of women in research universities in the United States: Within the inner circles of academic power. In Women's higher education in comparative perspective, ed. G.P. Kelly, and S. Slaughter, 185-200. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
61. Morley, L. 1994. Glass ceiling or iron cage: Women in UK academia. Gender, work and organization 10, no. 2: 137-53.
62. Nelson, J. 1996. Feminism, objectivity and economics. London: Routledge.
63. Poole, M., L. Bornholt, and F. Summers. 1997. An international study of the gendered nature of academic work: Some cross-cultural explorations. Higher Education 34: 373-96.
64. Postman, N. 1993. Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage.
65. Prichard, C. 2006. A warm embrace? New Zealand, universities and the 'Knowledge-based economy'. Social Epistemology 20, no. 3-4: 283-97.
66. Rowland, S. 1994. Perspectives on teaching and research. In Learning in difficult times: Issues for teaching in higher education, ed. P. Carotte, and M. Hammond, 55-65. Sheffield: Universities and Colleges' Staff Development Unit.
67. Ruth, D.W. 2001. Staff perceptions of teaching and research at the University of the North. South African Journal of Higher Education 15, no. 1: 154-70.
68. Schiebinger, L. 1993. Nature's body: Gender in the making of modern science. Boston: Beacon Press.
69. Scott, J. 1998. Seeing like a state. New Haven: Yale University Press.
70. Scott, S., and M. Porter. 1984. The double marginalisation of women in research. In Is higher education fair to women?, ed. S. Acker, and D.W. Piper, 180-6. Guildford: SRHE-NFER-Nelson.
71. Shiva, V. 1993. Monocultures of the mind: Perspectives on biodiversity and biotechnology. London: Zed Books.
72. Smith, D. 1978. A peculiar eclipsing. Women's Studies International Quarterly 1: 1-17.
73. Spender, D. 1981. The gatekeepers: A feminist critique of academic publishing. In Doing feminist research, ed. H. Roberts, l86-202. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
74. Stanley, L. 1984. How the social science research process discriminates against women. In Is higher education fair to women?, ed. S. Acker, and D.W. Piper, 189-209. Guildford: SRHE-NFER-Nelson.
75. Tawhai, V., K. Pihera, and P. Bruce-Ferguson. 2004. Does the PBRF need reshaping? A new Maori educational institution's perspective. Paper presented at the HERDSA Conference, Miri, Malaysia.
76. Townley, B. 1993. Performance appraisal and the emergence of management. Journal of Management Studies 30, no. 2: 22l-38.
77. Trow, M. 1994. Managerialism and the academic profession: The case of England. Higher Education Policy 7, no. 2: ll-8.
78. Veak, T. 2000. Whose technology? Whose modernity? Questioning Feenberg's 'Questioning Technology'. Science, Technology and Human Values 25, no. 2: 226-37.
79. Visvanathan, S. 2001. The grand sociology of Manuel Castells. In Challenges of globalisation: South African debates with Manuel Castells, ed. J. Muller, N. Cloete, and S. Badat, 3-49. Pinelands, Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman.
80. Waiti, D. 2004. Publish or perish: Negotiating research territories within Ng_W_nanga. Paper presented at the HERDSA Conference, July 4-7, in Miri, Malaysia.
81. Whitehead, S. 200l. The invisible gendered subject: Men in education management. Journal of Gender Studies l0, no. l: 67-82.
82. Williams, W., and L. Chrisman. l994. Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
83. Willmott, H. 1984. Images and ideals of managerial work: A critical examination of conceptual and empirical accounts. Journal of Management Studies 24: 249-70.
84. Willmott, H. 2003. Commercialising higher education in the UK: The state, industry and peer review. Studies in Higher Education 28, no. 2: l29-4l.
85. Winiati, W. 2003. The performance-based research fund: Incompatibility. Unpublished manuscript.
86. Winter, R., T. Taylor, and J. Sarros. 2000. Trouble at the Mill: Quality of academic worklife issues within a comprehensive Australian university. Studies in Higher Education 25, no. 3: 279-95.