Commercialising higher education in the UK: The state, industry and peer review

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 129-141

  Willmott, Hugh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037403404     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0307507032000058127     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. ARMSTRONG, P. (2000) Science, enterprise and profit: ideology in the knowledge-driven economy, paper presented to the New Economy Workshop, University of London, December.
2. COMMITTEE OF VICE-CHANCELLORS AND PRINCIPAL (CVCP) (1999) Technology Transfer: the US experience (London, VCP).
3. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY (1998) Our Competitive Future: building the knowledge driven economy; available at: http://www.dti.gov.uk/competitive/main/html.
4. ELTON, L. (2000) The UK Research Assessment Exercise: unitended consequences, Higher Education Quarterly, 54, pp. 274-283.
5. FASSIM, Y. (1991) Academic ethos v business ethics, International Journal of Technology Management, 6, pp. 533-546.
6. GRIFFITH, J. (1989) Universities and the State: the next steps (London Council for Academic Freedom and Democracy).
7. HAGUE, D. (1991) Beyond Universities: a new republic of the intellect (London, Institute of Economic Affairs).
8. HALSEY, A.H. (1995) The Decline of Donnish Domination: the British academic professions in the twentieth century (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
9. HARLEY, S. (2000) Accountants Divided: research selectivity and academic accounting labour in UK universities, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 11, pp. 549-582.
10. HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL (1994) 1996 Research Assessment Exercise (Bristol, Higher Education Funding Councils for England, Scotland and Wales).
11. HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL FOR ENGLAND (1995a) Guidance on Submissions; available at: www.hefce.ac.uk
12. HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL FOR ENGLAND (1995b) Membership of Assessment Panels (Revised); available at: www.hefce.ac.uk
13. HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL FOR ENGLAND (1997) The Impact of the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise on Higher Education Institutions in the UK; available at: www.hefce.ac.uk
14. HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL FOR ENGLAND (1998) Research Assessment Exercise in 2001: key decisions and issues for further consultation; available at: www.hefce.ac.uk
15. HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL FOR ENGLAND (1999) Research Assessment Exercise 2001: membership of assessment panels; available at: www.hefce.ac.uk
16. HOWELLS, J., NEDEVA, M. & GEORGHIOU, L. (1998) Industry-Academic Links in the UK (Higher Education Funding Council for England).
17. JACKSON, N. & CARTER, P. (1998) Labour as dressage, in: A. McKINLAY & K. STARKEY (Eds) Foucault, Management and Organization Theory: from panopticon to technologies of self (London, Sage).
18. JONES, C.S. (1991) Power, politics and the Jarratt proposals for accounting in British universities, Financial Accountability and Management, 7, pp. 143-158.
19. LEE, F. & HARLEY, S. (1997) Peer review, the research assessment exercise and the demise of heterodox economics, Working Paper, Department of Economics, De Montfort University. Later published in revised form as: Peer review, the research assessment exercise and the demise of non-mainstream economics, Capital and Class, 66, pp. 23-45.
20. LYOTARD, J-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: a report on knowledge (Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press).
21. McNAY, I. (1996) The Impact of the 1992 RAE on Institutional and Individual Behaviour in English Higher Education: the evidence from the research project (Higher Education Funding Council for England).
22. McNAY, I. (1997) The impact of the 1992 research assessment exercise in English universities, Higher Education Review, 29, pp. 34-43.
23. MILLER, H. (1995) States, economies and the changing labour process of academics: Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom, in: J. SMYTHE (Ed.) Academic Work (Buckingham, Open University Press).
24. MILLER, H. & EDWARDS, T. (n.d.) University management, the state and economy. Working Paper, Aston Business School.
25. O'BRIEN, P. (1994) Research selectivity exercises: a sceptical but positive note, Higher Education Review, 27, pp. 7-17.
26. PETERS, M. (1992) Performance and accountability in 'post-industrial society': the crisis of British universities, Studies in Higher Education, 17, pp. 123-139.
27. PHILLIMORE, A. (1989) University research performance indicators in practice: the University Grants Committee evaluation of British universities 1985-6, Research Policy, 18, pp. 255-271.
28. PRICHARD, C. (2000) Making Managers in Universities and Colleges (Buckingham, Open University Press).
29. ROYAL SOCIETY (2000) Research Policy and Funding, (London, Royal Society).
30. SCOTT, P. (1984) The Crisis of the University (London, Groom Helm).
31. SCOTT, P. (1991) Beyond the dual-support system: scholarship, research and teaching in the context of academic autonomy, Studies in Higher Education, 16, pp. 5-13.
32. SHUMAR, W. (1997) College for Sale; a critique of the commodification of higher education (Washington DC, Falmer Press).
33. SLAUGHTER, S. & LESLIE, L.L. (1997) Academic Capitalism (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press).
34. TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION SUPPLEMENT (1998) The changing nature of further education, 22 May.
35. TROW, M. (1994) Managerialism and the academic profession: quality and control, Quality Support Centre, Higher Education Report No. 2 (Wembley, Hensel Press).
36. WILLIAMS, G. (1996) The many faces of privatisation, Higher Education Management, 8(3), pp. 39-56.