Evaluating a national science and technology program using the human capital and relational asset perspectives

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 487-497

  Hung, Chia Liang ^a   Chou, Jerome Chih Lung ^b   Roan, Hung Wei ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHI NAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b HWA HSIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPLOYMENT; HUMAN CAPITAL; KNOWLEDGE; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY POLICY; TELECOMMUNICATION;

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE MANPOWER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; TAIWAN; TELECOMMUNICATION; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; HEALTH MANPOWER; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TAIWAN; TELECOMMUNICATIONS;

TAIWAN;

EID: 77954175857     PISSN: 01497189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bontis N. Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision 1998, 36(2):63-76.
2. Bozeman B., Dietz J., Gaughan M. Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management 2001, 22(7/8):636-655.
3. Brown E.A. Measuring performance at the army research laboratory: the performance evaluation construct. Journal of Technology Transfer 1997, 22(2):21-26.
4. Callon M., Larédo P., Mustar P. Strategic management of research and technology: evaluation of programmes 1997, Economica International, Paris.
5. Chiang J.T. Management of national technology programs in a newly industrialized country-Taiwan. Technovation 1990, 10(8):531-554.
6. Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990, 35(1):128-152.
7. Cozzens S.E. The knowledge pool: measurement challenges in evaluating fundamental research programs. Evaluation and Program Planning 1997, 20(1):77-89.
8. Dalpe R. Evaluating the industrial relevance of public R&D laboratories. Evaluating R&D impacts: methods and practice 1993, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. B. Bozeman, J. Melkers (Eds.).
9. Georghiou L. Issues in the evaluation of innovation and technology policy. Evaluation 1998, 4(1):37-51.
10. Kundu S.C., Kumar R. Evaluating benefits of training and development: a study of Indian and multinational companies. Proceedings of 12th Asia Pacific Management Conference 2006, 760-768. [ISSN: 974-8257-30-4].
11. Lanzi D. Capabilities, human capital and education. Journal of Socio-Economics 2007, 36(3):424-435.
12. Lepori B. Methodologies for the analysis of research funding and expenditure: from input to positioning indicators. Research Evaluation 2006, 15(2):133-143.
13. Luwel M. Job advertisements as an indicator for mobility of researchers: naturejobs as a case study. Research Evaluation 2005, 14(1):80-92.
14. Mann S., Robertson I.T. What should training evaluations evaluate?. Journal of European Industrial Training 2006, 20(9):14-20.
15. Mohr J., Sengupta S., Slater S. Marketing of high-technology products and innovations 2005, Prentice-Hall. 2nd ed.
16. NSC White paper on science and technology (2007-2010) 2007, National Science Council, Taipei.
17. NSC 2007 Yearbook of science and technology of Taiwan 2007, National Science Council, Taipei.
18. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation Development) Frascati manual: proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development 2002, OECD Publishing, Paris.
19. Rogers J.D., Bozeman B. Knowledge value alliances: an alternative to the R&D project focus in evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values 2001, 26(1):23-55.
20. Sakakibara M. Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan: who benefits and how?. Research Policy 1997, 26(4-5):447-473.
21. Sharma S. Applied multivariate techniques 2005, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
22. Steinbock D. Wireless horizon: strategy and competition in the worldwide mobile marketplace 2002, AMA, New York.
23. Stewart T. Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organizations 1997, Doubleday Publishing.
24. Thomas P., Breitzman A. A method for identifying hot patents and linking them to government-funded scientific research. Research Evaluation 2006, 15(2):145-152.
25. Wu H.L. Economic analysis of developing technological human capitals by technology budget 2006, CIER, Taipei.