Methodologies for the analysis of research funding and expenditure: From input to positioning indicators

Research Evaluation

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 133-143

  Lepori, Benedetto ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUGANO   (Switzerland)

^b Observatoire des Sciences et Techniques   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750547107     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154406781775995     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Barré R 2001. Sense and nonsense of S&T productivity indicators, Science and Public Policy, 28(4), 259-266.
2. Barré R 2006. Towards a European STI Indicators Platform (ESTIP), position paper to the Second PRIME Network of Excellence Annual Conference.
3. BMBF 2004. Bundesbericht Forschung 2004, Berlin.
4. Bonaccorsi, A and C Daraio 2004. Econometric approaches to the analysis of productivity of R&D systems. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, eds. H Moed, W Glänzel and U Schmoch, pp. 51-74. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
5. Bonaccorsi, A, C Daraio and B Lepori 2006. Indicators for the analysis of higher education systems: some methodological reflections. In Universities as Strategic Units, eds. A Bonaccorsi and C Daraio. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, forthcoming.
6. Braun D 2003. Lasting tensions in research policy-making - a delegation problem. Science and Public Policy, 30(5), 309-321.
7. Brown, L et al 2004. Measuring Research and Development Expenditures in the US Economy. Washington, National Academies Press.
8. Dinges M 2006. Project Funding. Country Report: Austria. Paris: European Network of Indicators Producers.
9. Esterle, L and J Theves 2005. Analysis of the different European systems for producing indicators, paper presented at the Workshop on S&T Indicators Production, Lisbon, 22-23 September 2005.
10. EC, European Commission 2004. Commission Regulation (EC) No 753/2004 of 22 April 2004 implementing Decision No 1608/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards statistics on science and technology. Brussels: EC.
11. Geuna, A 2001. The changing rationale for European university research funding: are there negative unintended consequences?. Journal of Economic Issues, 35(3), 607-632.
12. Geuna, A and B Martin 2003. University research evaluation and funding: an international comparison. Minerva, 41, 277-304.
13. Godin, B 2004. Globalizing S&T indicators: how statisticians responded to the political agenda on globalization. Project on the History and Sociology of S&T Statistics, Working Paper 27.
14. Godin, B 2005a. Measurement and Statistics on Science and Technology: 1920 to the Present. London: Routledge.
15. Godin, B 2005b. Science, accounting and statistics: the inputoutput framework. Project on the History and Sociology of S& T Statistics, Working Paper 31.
16. Inzelt, A 2005. National Systems of S&T Data/Indicators Production: Country Report on Hungary. Paris.
17. Irvine, J, B Martin and P Isard 1990. Investing in the Future: An International Comparison of Government Funding of Academic and Related Research. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
18. Jacobsson, S and A Rickne 2004. How large is the Swedish "academic" sector really? A critical analysis of the use of science and technology indicators. Research Policy, 33, 1355-1372.
19. Jongbloed, B and C Salerno 2004. Kosten per Student. Methodologie, schattingen en een internationale vergelijking. CHEPS report, Twente.
20. Lepori, B 2005. Project Funding. Country Report: Switzerland. Paris: European Network of Indicators Producers.
21. Lepori, B 2006a. La politique de la recherche suisse: Acteurs, institutions et développement historique. Bern: Haupt, forthcoming.
22. Lepori, B 2006b. Public research funding and research policy: a long-term analysis for the Swiss case. Science and Public Policy, 33(4).
23. Lepori, B, M Benninghoff, B Jongbloed, C Salerno and S Slipersaeter 2006. Changing models and patterns of higher education funding: some empirical evidence. In Universities as Strategic Units, eds. A Bonaccorsi and C Daraio.Aldershot: Edward Elgar, forthcoming.
24. Lepori, B, M Dinges, B Poti and E Reale 2005. Public project funding of research activities, a comparative analysis in six European countries, paper to presented at the Workshop on S&T Indicators Production, Lisbon, 22-23 September 2005.
25. Luwel, M 2004. The use of input data in the performance analysis of R&D systems. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, eds. H Moed, W Glänzel and U Schmoch, pp. 315-338. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
26. Mairesse, J and M Sasenou 1991. R&D and productivity: a survey of econometric studies at the firm level. Science-Technology Industry Review, 6, 9-43.
27. Millar, J and J Senker 2000. International Approaches to Research Policy and Funding: University Research Policy in Different National Contexts. Brighton: SPRU.
28. Moed H, W Glänzel and U Schmoch 2004. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
29. NSF, National Science Foundation 2004. Science and Engineering Indicators 2004. Washington.
30. OECD, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1991. OECD Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data (Oslo Manual). Paris: OECD.
31. OECD 1995. Manual on the Measurement of Human Resources in Science and Technology (Canberra Manual). Paris: OECD.
32. OECD 1995a. The Measurement of University R&D: Principal Problems of International Comparability. Paris: OECD.
33. OECD 2000a. Measuring R&D in the Higher Education Sector: Methods Used in the OECDEU Member Countries (Revised with 2000 Data), DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI(97)2.
34. OECD 2000b. R&D Statistics: Sources and Methods. Paris: OECD.
35. OECD 2001. Measuring Expenditure on Health-Related R&D. Paris: OECD.
36. OECD 2002. Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. Paris: OECD.
37. OECD 2003. Governance of Public Research. Towards Better Practices. Paris: OECD.
38. OECD 2004. The Internationalisation of Industrial R&D: Policy Issues and Measurements Problems. Paris: OECD.
39. OECD 2005. OECD Handbook on Economic Globalisation Indicators. Paris: OECD.
40. Potì, B, and E Reale 2005. Project Funding. Country report: Italy. Paris: European Network of Indicators Producers.
41. Teichler, U 1996. The conditions of the academic profession: an international comparative analysis of the academic profession in Western Europe, Japan and the USA. In Inside Academia: New Challenges for the Academic Profession, eds. P A M Maassen and F A van Vught. Enschede, Netherlands: Center for Higher Education Policies.
42. Van Raan, A. 2004. Measuring science. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, eds. H Moed, W Glänzel and U Schmoch, pp. 19-50. Dordrecht: Kluwer.