Fast and Frugal Framing Effects?

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1043-1052

  McCloy, Rachel ^a   Beaman, C Philip ^a   Frosch, Caren A ^a   Goddard, Kate ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Fast and frugal; Framing; Heuristic; Judgment; Recognition

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; JUDGMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954169272     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019693     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bennis W.M., Pachur T. Fast and frugal heuristics in sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2006, 7:611-629.
2. Bilalić M., McLeod P., Gobet F. Why good thoughts block better ones: The mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect. Cognition 2008, 108:652-661.
3. Gigerenzer G., Goldstein D.G. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review 1996, 103:650-669.
4. Goldstein D.G., Gigerenzer G. Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review 2002, 109:75-90.
5. Grice H.P. Logic and conversation. Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts 1975, 41-58. Academic Press, New York, NY. P. Cole, J. Morgan (Eds.).
6. Johnson-Laird P.N., Shafir E. The interaction between reasoning and decision making: An introduction. Cognition 1993, 49:1-9.
7. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:263-291.
8. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 1984, 39:341-350.
9. Kuhberger A. The framing of decisions: A new look at old problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1995, 62:230-240.
10. Kuhberger A. The influence of framing on risky decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1998, 75:23-55.
11. Luchins A.S., Luchins E.H. Rigidity of behavior: A variational approach to the effects of Einstellung 1959, University of Oregon Press, Eugene, OR.
12. McCloy R., Beaman C.P., Morgan B., Speed R. Training conditional and cumulative risk judgments: The role of frequencies, problem-structure, and Einstellung. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2007, 21:325-344.
13. Oppenheimer D.M. Not so fast! (and not so frugal!) Rethinking the recognition heuristic. Cognition 2003, 90:B1-B9.
14. Pachur T., Biele G. Forecasting from ignorance: The use and usefulness of recognition in lay predictions of sports events. Acta Psychologica 2007, 125:99-116.
15. Pachur T., Hertwig R. On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: Retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32:983-1002.
16. Serwe S., Frings C. Who will win Wimbledon? The recognition heuristic in predicting sports events. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2006, 19:321-332.
17. Sher S., McKenzie C.R.M. Information leakage from logically equivalent frames. Cognition 2006, 101:467-494.
18. Sunday Times Rich List 2005. The Sunday Times (special supplement) 2005, April 3.
19. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981, January 30, 211:453-458.
20. Volz K.G., Schooler L.J., Schubotz R.I., Raab M., Gigerenzer G., von Cramon D.Y. Why you think Milan is larger than Modena: Neural correlates of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:1924-1936.