The role of working memory in information acquisition and decision making: Lessons from the binary prediction task

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 63, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1335-1360

  Rakow, Tim ^a   Newell, Ben R ^b   Zougkou, Konstantina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Binary prediction; Choice; Information acquisition; Intelligence; Memory; Probability; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MATHEMATICS; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADULT; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MATHEMATICS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954166752     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210903357945     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anderson, R. B., Doherty, M. E., Berg, N. D., & Friedrich, J. C. (2005). Sample size and the detection of correlation-a signal detection account: Comment on Kareev (2000) and Juslin and Olsson. Psychological Review, 112, 268-279.
2. Bereby-Meyer, Y., & Erev, I. (1998). On learning to become a successful loser: A comparison of alternative abstractions of learning processes in the loss domain. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 42, 266-286.
3. Brackbill, Y., Kappy, M. S., & Starr, R. H. (1962). Magnitude of reward and probability learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 32-35.
4. Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432-459.
5. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
6. Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769-786.
7. Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A metaanalysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422-433.
8. Dawes, R. M. (1982). The robust beauty of improper linear models. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 391-407). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B. (1974). Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 95-106.
10. Derks, P. L., & Paclisanu, M. I. (1967). Simple strategies in binary prediction by children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 278-285.
11. Dierckx, V., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005). Adaptive strategy application in linear reasoning. In M. J. Roberts & E. J. Newton (Eds.), Methods of thought: Individual differences in reasoning strategies (pp. 107-127). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
12. Edwards, W. (1965). Optimal strategies for seeking information. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 2, 312-329.
13. Elwin, E., Juslin, P., Olsson, H., & Enkvist, T. (2007). Constructivist coding: Learning from selective feedback. Psychological Science, 18, 105-110.
14. Engle, R. W., Nations, J. K., & Cantor, J. (1990). Is "working memory capacity" just another name for word knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 799-804.
15. Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309-331.
16. Fantino, E., & Esfandiari, A. (2002). Probability matching: Encouraging optimal responding in humans. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 58-63.
17. Gaissmaier, W., & Schooler, L. J. (2008). The smart potential behind probability matching. Cognition, 109, 416-422.
18. Gaissmaier, W., Schooler, L. J., & Rieskamp, J. (2006). Simple predictions fueled by capacity limitations: When are they successful? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 966-982.
19. Gal, I., & Baron, J. (1996). Understanding repeated simple choices. Thinking and Reasoning, 2, 81-98.
20. Goodnow, J. J. (1955). Determinants of choice-distribution in two-choice situations. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 106-116.
21. Hitch, G. J., Halliday, M. S., & Littler, J. E. (1989). Item identification time and rehearsal as predictors of memory span in children. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 375-386.
22. Hogarth, R. M. (2006). Is confidence in decisions related to feedback? Evidence from random samples of real-world behavior. In K. Fiedler & P. Juslin (Eds.), Information sampling and adaptive cognition (pp. 456-484). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Humphreys, L. G. (1939). Acquisition and extinction of verbal expectations in a situation analogous to conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 294-301.
24. Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (2005). Capacity limitations and the detection of correlations: Comment on Kareev (2000). Psychological Review, 112, 256-267.
25. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
26. Kareev, Y. (1995a). Positive bias in the perception of covariation. Psychological Review, 102, 490-502.
27. Kareev, Y. (1995b). Through a narrow window: Working memory capacity and the detection of covariation. Cognition, 56, 263-269.
28. Kareev, Y. (2000). Seven (indeed, plus or minus two) and the detection of correlations. Psychological Review, 107, 397-402.
29. Kareev, Y. (2005). And yet the small-sample effect does hold: Reply to Juslin and Olsson (2005) and Anderson, Doherty, Berg, and Friedrich (2005). Psychological Review, 112, 280-285.
30. Kareev, Y., Lieberman, I., & Lev, M. (1997). Through a narrow window: Sample size and the perception of correlation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 278-287.
31. Kyllonen, P. C. (1996). Is working memory capacity Spearman's g? In I. Dennis & P. Tapsfield (Ed.), Human abilities: Their nature and measurement (pp. 49-76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. March, J. G. (1996). Learning to be risk averse. Psychological Review, 103, 309-319.
33. Meo, M., Roberts, M. J., & Marucci, F. S. (2007). Element salience as a predictor of item difficulty for Raven's Progressive Matrices. Intelligence, 35, 359-368.
34. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
35. Mogle, J. A., Lovett, B. J., Stawski, R. S., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2008). What's so special about working memory? An examination of the realtionship among working memory, secondary memory, and fluid intelligence. Psychological Science, 19, 1071-1077.
36. Newell, B. R., & Rakow, T. (2007). The role of experience in decisions from description. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 1133-1139.
37. Nies, R. C. (1962). Effects of probable outcome information on two-choice learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 430-433.
38. Peterson, C. R., & Ulehla, Z. J. (1965). Sequential patterns and maximizing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1-4.
39. Rakow, T., Demes, K. A., & Newell, B. R. (2008). Biased samples not mode of presentation: Reexamining the apparent underweighting of rare events in experience-based choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106, 168-179.
40. Sarin, R., & Vahid, F. (2001). Predicting how people play games: A simple dynamic model of choice. Games and Economic Behavior, 34, 104-122.
41. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726.
42. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127-154.
43. Tversky, A., & Edwards, W. (1966). Information versus reward in binary choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 680-683.
44. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
45. West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2003). Is probability matching smart? Associations between probabilistic choices and cognitive ability. Memory and Cognition, 31, 243-251.
46. Wolford, G., Newman, S. E., Miller, M. B., & Wig, G. S. (2004). Searching for patterns in random sequences. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 221-228.