Predicting How People Play Games: A Simple Dynamic Model of Choice

Games and Economic Behavior

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 104-122

  Sarin, Rajiv ^a   Vahid, Farshid ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000135041     PISSN: 08998256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/game.1999.0783     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bereby-Meyer Y., Erev I. On Learning To Become a Successful Loser: A Comparison of Alternative Abstractions of Learning Processes in the Loss Domain. J. Math. Psychol. 42:1998;266-286.
2. Börgers T., Sarin R. Learning Through Reinforcement and Replicator Dynamics. J. Econom. Theory. 77:1997;1-14.
3. Börgers T., Sarin R. Naive Reinforcement Learning with Endogenous Aspirations. Int. Econom. Rev. 2000.
4. Camerer C., Ho T. Experience Weighted Attraction Learning in Normal-Form Games. Econometrica. 67:1999;827-874.
5. Clements M., Hendry D. Towards a Theory of Economic Forecasting. Hargreaves C. Nonstationary Time Series Analysis of Co-integration. 1994;Oxford University Press.
6. Erev, I, and, Roth, A. 1996, On the Need For Low Rationality, Cognitive Game Theory: Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Games with Unique, Mixed Strategy Equilibrium, mimeo, University of Pittsburgh.
7. Erev I., Roth A. Predicting How People Play Games: Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Games with Unique, Mixed Strategy Equilibrium. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88:1998;848-881.
8. Fudenberg D., Levine D. Theory of Learning in Games. 1998;MIT Press.
9. Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. Case Based Decision Theory. Q. J. Econom. 110:1995;605-639.
10. Kendall M., Stuart A., Ord J. Advanced Theory of Statistics. 1991.
11. Malcolm D., Liebermann B. The Behavior of Responsive Individuals Playing a Two-Person, Zero-Sum Game Requiring the Use of Mixed Strategies. Psychonomic Sci. 1965;373-374.
12. Ochs J. Simple Games with Unique Mixed-Strategy Equilibrium: An Experimental Study. Games Econom. Behav. 10:1995;202-217.
13. O'Neill B. Nonmetric Test of the Minimax Theory of Two-Person Zero-Sum Games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 84:1987;2106-2109.
14. Rapoport A., Boebel R. Mixed Strategies in Strictly Competitive Games: A Further Test of the Minmax Hypothesis. Games Econom. Behav. 4:1992;261-283.
15. Roth A., Erev I. Learning in Extensive-Form Games: Experimental Data and Simple Dynamic Models in the Intermediate Run. Games Econom. Behav. 6:1995;164-212.
16. Sarin, R, and, Vahid, F. 1998, Payoff Assessments Without Probabilities: Incorporating Similarity among Strategies, mimeo, Texas A&M University and Monash University.
17. Sarin R., Vahid F. Payoff Assessments Without Probabilities: A simple dynamic model of choice. Games Econom. Behav. 28:1999;294-309.
18. Suppes P., Atkinson R. Markov Learning Models for Multiperson Interactions. 1960;Stanford University Press.