Is probability matching smart? Associations between probabilistic choices and cognitive ability

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 243-251

  West, Richard F ^a   Stanovich, Keith E ^b  

^a JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MENTAL TEST; NORMAL HUMAN; PROBABILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0037367755     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194383     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. ANDERSON, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. ANDERSON, J. R. (1991). Is human cognition adaptive? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 14, 471-517.
3. BARON, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
4. BRASE, G. L., COSMIDES, L., & TOOBY, J. (1998). Individuation, counting, and statistical inference: The role of frequency and whole-object representations in judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 3-21.
5. BYRNES, J. P., & OVERTON, W. F. (1986). Reasoning about certainty and uncertainty in concrete, causal, and propositional contexts. Developmental Psychology, 22, 793-799.
6. CHATER, N., & OAKSFORD, M. (2000). The rational analysis of mind and behaviour. Synthèse, 122, 93-131.
7. CHATER, N., & OAKSFORD, M. (2001). Human rationality and the psychology of reasoning: Where do we go from here? British Journal of Psychology, 92, 193-216.
8. CHIPMAN, S. F. (1996). Still far too sexy a topic. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 19, 248-249.
9. COOPER, W. S. (1989). How evolutionary biology challenges the classical theory of rational choice. Biology & Philosophy, 4, 457-481.
10. COOPER, W. S., & KAPLAN, R. H. (1982). Adaptive coin-flipping: A decision-theoretic examination of natural selection for random individual variation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 94, 135-151.
11. COSMIDES, L., & TOOBY, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 163-205). New York: Oxford University Press.
12. COSMIDES, L., & TOOBY, J. (1994). Beyond intuition and instinct blindness: Toward an evolutionarily rigorous cognitive science. Cognition, 50, 41-77.
13. COSMIDES, L., & TOOBY, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58, 1-73.
14. DAWES, R. M. (1998). Behavioral decision making and judgment. In D. T Gilbert, S. T Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 497-548). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
15. ENGLE, R. W., TUHOLSKI, S. W., LAUGHLIN, J. E., & CONWAY, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309-331.
16. EVANS, J. S. B. T., & OVER, D. E. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
17. FANTINO, E., & ESFANDIARI, A. (2002). Probability matching: Encouraging optimal responding in humans. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 58-63.
18. FIORINA, M. P. (1971). A note on probability matching and rational choice. Behavioral Science, 16, 158-166.
19. GAL, I., & BARON, J. (1996). Understanding repeated simple choices. Thinking & Reasoning, 2, 81-98.
20. GEARY, D. C. (1996). Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 19, 229-247.
21. GIGERENZER, G. (1996a). On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996). Psychological Review, 103, 592-596.
22. GIGERENZER, G. (1996b). Rationality: Why social context matters. In P. B. Baltes & U. Staudinger (Eds.), Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition (pp. 319-346). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. GILOVICH, T., GRIFFIN, D., & KAHNEMAN, D. (Eds.) (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH (1999-2000). Table 2-20: Distribution of SAT scores of entering class by sex, fall 1998-99. Retrieved November 11, 2001, from http://www. jmu.edu/instresearch/statsum/199900/2-20.htm.
25. JEPSON, C., KRANTZ, D., & NISBETT, R. (1983). Inductive reasoning: Competence or skill? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 6, 494-501.
26. KAHNEMAN, D., & FREDERICK, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49-81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. KAHNEMAN, D., SLOVIC, P., & TVERSKY, A. (Eds.) (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. KAHNEMAN, D., & TVERSKY, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
29. KAHNEMAN, D., & TVERSKY, A. (Eds.) (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. KEREN, G., & WAGENAAR, W. A. (1985). On the psychology of playing blackjack: Normative and descriptive considerations with implications for decision theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 133-158.
31. KIMURA, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. KOKIS, J., MACPHERSON, R., TOPLAK, M., WEST, R. F., & STANOVICH, K. E. (2002). Heuristic and analytic processing: Age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 26-52.
33. KYLLONEN, P. C. (1996). Is working memory capacity Spearman's g? In I. Dennis & P. Tapsfield (Eds.), Human abilities: Their nature and measurement (pp. 49-76). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. MANKTELOW, K. I. (1999). Reasoning and thinking. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
35. OAKSFORD, M., & CHATER, N. (1998). Rationality in an uncertain world. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
36. OAKSFORD, M., & CHATER, N. (2001). The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 349-357.
37. PETERSON, C. R., & ULEHLA, Z. (1965). Sequential patterns and maximizing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1-4.
38. RODE, C., COSMIDES, L., HELL, W., & TOOBY, J. (1999). When and why do people avoid unknown probabilities in decisions under uncertainty? Testing some predictions from optimal foraging theory. Cognition, 72, 269-304.
39. SHAFIR, E., & LEBOEUF, R. A. (2002). Rationality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 491-517.
40. SHANKS, D. R., TUNNEY, R. J., & MCCARTHY, J. D. (2002). A reexamination of probability matching and rational choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 233-250.
41. SKYRMS, B. (1996). The evolution of the social contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. STANOVICH, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. STANOVICH, K. E., & WEST, R. F. (1998a). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 161-188.
44. STANOVICH, K. E., & WEST, R. F. (1998b). Who uses base rates and P(D/∼H)? An analysis of individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26, 161-179.
45. STANOVICH, K. E., & WEST, R. F. (1999). Discrepancies between normative and descriptive models of decision making and the understanding/acceptance principle. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 349-385.
46. STANOVICH, K. E., & WEST, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726.
47. TODD, P. M., & GIGERENZER, G. (2000). Precis of Simple heuristics that make us smart. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 727-780.
48. TVERSKY, A., & EDWARDS, W. (1966). Information versus reward in binary choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 680-683.
49. WEST, R. F., & STANOVICH, K. E. (1991). The incidental acquisition of information from reading. Psychological Science, 2, 325-330.