The use of a dual-task paradigm for assessing speech intelligibility in clients with Parkinson disease

Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 141-155

  Bunton, Kate ^a   Keintz, Connie K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954147300     PISSN: 10651438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Hallett, M. & Khoshbin, S. (1980). A physiological mechanism of bradykinesia. Brain, 103, 301-314. (Pubitemid 10046625)
2. Hammen, V., Yorkston, K., & Beukelman, D. (1988). Pausal and speech duration characteristics as a function of speaking rate in normal and Parkinsonian dysarthric individuals. In K. Yorkston & D. Beukelman (Eds.), Recent advances in clinical dysarthria (pp. 213-224). Boston: Little, Brown.
3. Ho, A., Iansek, R., & Bradshaw, J. (2002). The effect of a concurrent task on Parkinsonian Speech. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 36-47. (Pubitemid 34412136)
4. Hustad, K., & Weismer, G. (2007). Interventions to improve intelligibility and communicative success for speakers with dysarthria. In G. Weismer (Ed.), Motor Speech Disorders: Essays for Ray Kent (pp. 261-303). San Diego: Plural Publishing.
5. Iansek, R., Bradshaw, J., Phillips, J., Cunnington, R., & Morris, M. (1995). Interaction of the basal ganglia and supplementary motor area in the elaboration of movement. In D. Glencross & J. Piek (Eds.), Motor control and sensory integration: Issues and directions (pp. 37-59). New York: Elselvier.
6. Jou, J., & Harris, R. (1992). The effect of divided attention on speech production. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 301-304.
7. Kalikow, D., Stevens, K, & Elliott, L. (1977). Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1337-1351. (Pubitemid 8086815)
8. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9. Keintz, C., Bunton, K., & Hoit, J. (2007). Influence of visual information on the intelligibility of dysarthric speech. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 16, 222-234.
10. Kempler, D., & Van Lancker, D. (2002). Effect of speech task on intelligibility in dysarthria: A case study of Parkinson's disease. Brain and Language, 80, 449-464. (Pubitemid 34921334)
11. Kent, R., & Read, C. (1992). The acoustic analysis of speech. San Diego: Singular Publishing.
12. Kent R., Weismer, G., Kent, J. & Rosenbek, J. (1989). Toward explanatory intelligibility testing in dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 482-499. (Pubitemid 19274774)
13. Kim, H. H. (1994). Monotony of speech production in Parkinson's disease: Acoustic entities and their perceptual relations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
14. Kleinow, J., & Smith, A. (2000). Influences of length and syntactic complexity on the speech motor stability of the fluent speech of adults who stutter. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 548-559.
15. LaBarba, R., Bowers, C., Kingsberg, S., & Freeman, G. (1987). The effects of concurrent vocalization on foot and hand motor performance: A test of the functional distance hypothesis. Cortex, 23, 301-308. (Pubitemid 17104389)
16. Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Li, K., Lindenberger, U., Freund, A., & Baltes, P. (2001). Walking while memorizing: A SOC study of age-related differences in compensatory behavior under dualtask conditions. Psychological Science, 12, 230-237. (Pubitemid 33653536)
18. Lindenberger, U., Marsiske, M., & Baltes, P. (2000). Memorizing while walking: Increase in dual-task costs from young adulthood to old age. Psychology of Aging, 15, 417-436.
19. Marsden, C. (1982). The mysterious motor function of the basal ganglia: The Robert Wartenberg lecture. Neurology, 32, 514-539. (Pubitemid 12161356)
20. McLeod, P. (1977). Parallel processing and the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychologica, 41, 381-391.
21. McRae, P., Tjaden, K., & Schoonings, B. (2002). Acoustic and perceptual consequences of articulatory rate change in Parkinson disease. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 35-50. (Pubitemid 34131107)
22. Milenkovic, P. (2002). TF32 [computer program]. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
23. Moray, N. (1967). Where is attention limited? A survey and a model. Acta Psychologica, 27, 84-92.
24. Morrell, C. H., Gordon-Salant, S., Pearson, J. D., Brant, L. J. & Fozard, J. L. (1996). Age-and gender-specific reference ranges for hearing level and longitudinal changes in hearing level. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 100, 1949-1967.
25. Morris, M., Iansek, R., Matyas, T., & Summers, J. (1996). Stride length regulation in Parkinson's disease: Normalizing strategies and underlying mechanisms. Brain, 119, 551-568.
26. Murray, L. (1999). Attention and aphasia: Theory, research, and clinical implications. Aphasiology, 13, 91-111. (Pubitemid 29056160)
27. Navon, D., & Miller, J. (2002). Queuing or Sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 193-251. (Pubitemid 39659791)
28. Oldfield, R. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
29. Oliveira, R., Gurd, J., Nixon, P., Marhsall, J., & Passingham, R. (1998). Hypometria in Parkinson's disease: Automatic versus controlled processing. Movement Disorders, 13, 422-427. (Pubitemid 28221493)
30. Oomen, C., & Postma, A. (2001). Effects of divided attention on the production of filled pauses and repetitions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 997-1004. (Pubitemid 34014161)
31. Parush, A. (2005). Speech-based interaction in multitask conditions: Impact of prompt modality. Human Factors, 47, 591-597.
32. Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358-377.
33. Pashler, H. (1990). Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 826-842.
34. Pashler, H. (1994a). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244. (Pubitemid 24976769)
35. Pashler, H. (1994b). Graded capacity sharing in dual-task interference? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 330-342.
36. Sarno, M. (1968). Speech impairment in Parkinson's disease. Archives of Physiological Medicine and Rehabilitation, 49, 269-275.
37. Schiavetti, N., Whitehead, R., & Metz, D. (2004). The effects of simultaneous communication on production and perception of speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9, 286-304. (Pubitemid 38767862)
38. Seth-Smith, M., Ashton, R., & McFarland, K. (1989). A dual-task study of sex differences in language reception and production. Cortex, 25, 425-431. (Pubitemid 19244892)
39. Shuster, L. (2004). Forum: Resouce theory and aphasia reconsidered: Why alternative theories can better guide our research. Aphasiology, 18, 811-854.
40. Silverman, K. E. A. (1987). The structure and processing of fundamental frequency contours. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge, UK.
41. Simon, R., & Sussman, H. (1987). The dual-task paradigm: Speech dominance or manual dominance. Neuropsychologia, 25, 559-569. (Pubitemid 17113243)
42. Tjaden, K, & Wilding, G. (2004). Rate and loudness manipulations in dysarthria: Acoustic and perceptual findings. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 766-783. (Pubitemid 39129112)
43. Turner, G., & Weismer, G. (1993). Characteristics of speaking rate in the dysarthria associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 1134-1144. (Pubitemid 23354169)
44. Weismer, G. (1984). Articulatory characteristics of Parkinsonian dysarthria: Segmental and phrase-level timing, spirantization, and glottal-supraglottal coordination. In M. McNeil, J. Rosenbek, & A. Aronson (Eds.), The dysarthrias: Psychology, acoustics, perception, management (pp. 101-130). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
45. Wickens, C. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuramen & D. Davies (Eds.) Varieties of attention (pp. 63-102). Toronto: Academic Press.
46. Wickens, C. (1989). Attention and skilled performance. In D. Holding (Ed.) Human Skills (pp. 72-105). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
47. Yorkston, K., & Beukelman, D. (1978). A comparison of techniques for measuring intelligibility of dysarthric speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 11, 499-512.
48. Yorkston, K., Beukelman, D., Strand, E., & Bell, K. (1999). Management of motor speech disorders in children and adults. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.