Speech-based interaction in multitask conditions: Impact of prompt modality

Human Factors

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 591-597

  Parush, Avi ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION; DATA REDUCTION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; PERFORMANCE;

MULTITASK CONDITIONS; PROMPT MODALITY; SPEECH-BASED INTERACTIONS; TRACKING PERFORMANCE;

SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DRIVING ABILITY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; EYE HAND COORDINATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; SPEECH; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; WORKLOAD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DATA DISPLAY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH; SPEECH RECOGNITION SOFTWARE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WORKLOAD;

EID: 33644857123     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872005774860041     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Baber, C. (1993). Designing interactive speech technology. In C. Baber & J. M. Noyes (Eds.), Interactive speech technology (pp. 1-17). London: Taylor & Francis.
2. Baber, C., Mellor, B., Graham, R., Noyes, J. M., & Tunley, C. (1996). Workload and the use of automatic speech recognition: The effects of time and resource demands. Speech Communication, 20, 37-53.
3. Bradford, J. H. (1995). The human factors of speech-based interfaces: A research agenda. SIGCHI Bulletin, 27(2), 61-67.
4. Damos, D. L., & Lyall, E. A. (1986). The effect of varying stimulus and response modes and asymmetric transfer on the dual-task performance of discrete tasks. Ergonomics, 29, 519-533.
5. Gawron, V. J. (2000). Human performance measures handbook. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Graham, R., & Carter, C. (2001). Voice dialing can reduce the interference between concurrent tasks of driving and phoning. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 26(1), 30-47.
7. Hansen, B., Novick, G. D., & Sutton, S. (1996). Systematic design of spoken prompts. In Proceedings of the CHI '96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 157-164). New York: ACM Press.
8. Hapeshi, K., & Jones, D. M. (1989). Concurrent manual tracking and speaking: Implications for automatic speech recognition. In M. J. Smith & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Work with computers: Organizational, stress and health aspects (pp. 412-418). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
9. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Lee, J. D., Caven, B., Haake, S., & Brown, T. L. (2001). Speech-based interaction with in-vehicle computers: The effect of speech-based E-mail on driver's attention to the roadway. Human Factors, 43, 631-640.
11. Linde, A., & Shively, R. (1988). Field study of communication and workload in police helicopters: Implications for cockpit design. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 237-241). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
12. Marshall, J. P. (1992). A manufacturing application of voice recognition for assembly of aircraft wire harness. In Proceedings of Speech Tech/Voice Systems Worldwide (n.p.). New York: Media Dimensions.
13. Martin, G. L. (1989). The utility of speech input in user-computer interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 30, 355-375.
14. Martin, T. B. (1976). Practical applications of voice input to machines. Proceedings of the IEEE, 64(4), 487-501.
15. McCallum, M. C., Campbell, J. L., Richman, J. B., & Brown, J. L. (2004). Speech recognition and in-vehicle telematics devices: Potential reductions in driver distraction. International Journal of Speech Technology, 7, 25-33.
16. Moray, N. (1967). Where is attention limited? A survey and a model. Acta Psychologica, 27, 84-92.
17. Murata, A. (1998). Effectiveness of speech response under dual task situations. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 10(3), 283-292.
18. Rudnicky, A. I. (1995). The design of spoken language interfaces. In A. Syrdal, R. Bennett, & S. Greenspan (Eds.), Applied speech technology (pp. 403-428). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
19. Schmandt, C. (1994). Voice communication with computers: Conversational systems. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
20. Schraagen, J. M. C. (1993). Information presentation in in-car navigation systems. In A. M. Parkes & S. Franzen (Eds.), Driving future vehicles (pp. 171-185). London: Taylor & Francis.
21. Simpson, C. A., McCauley, M. E., Rolan, E. F, Ruth, J. C., & Williges, B. H. (1985). System design for speech recognition and generation. Human Factors, 27, 115-141.
22. Walker, M. A., Fromer, J., Di Fabbrizio, G., Mestel, C., & Hindle, D. (1998). What can I say?: Evaluating a spoken language interface to Email. In Proceedings of the CHI '98 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 582-589). New York: ACM Press.
23. Waterworth, J. A. (1982). Man-machine speech dialogue acts. Applied Ergonomics, 13, 203-207.
24. White, R. G. (1997). Lessons from flight research relevant to voice operated driver systems. In 4th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems (Paper No. 2001; pp. 21-24). Berlin: ICC.
25. Wickens, C. D. (1980). The structure of attentional resources. In R. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 239-257). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Wickens, C. D., Sandry, D. L., & Vidulich, M. (1983). Compatibility and resource competition between modalities of input, central processing and output. Human Factors, 25, 227-248.
27. Yankelovich, N. (1996). How do users know what to say? Interactions, 3(6), 32-43.
28. Yankelovich, N., Levow, G.-A., & Marx, M. (1995). Designing SpeechActs: Issues in speech user interfaces. In Proceedings of the CHI '95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 369-376). New York: ACM Press.