On integrating Kano's model dynamics into QFD for multiple product design

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 351-363

  Raharjo, Hendry ^a   Brombacher, Aarnout C ^b   Gohc, T N ^c   Bergmana, Bo ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Design for Six Sigma; Kano's model dynamics; Optimization; QFD

Indexed keywords

CHANGING ENVIRONMENT; CUSTOMER NEED; CUSTOMER PREFERENCES; DESIGN FOR SIX SIGMA; DESIGN PHASE; DESIGN PROCESS; ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLES; KANO'S MODEL; KANO'S MODEL DYNAMICS; KEY PROBLEMS; MULTIPLE PRODUCTS; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; OPTIMIZATION FRAMEWORK; PRODUCT CREATION PROCESS; QUANTITATIVE APPROACH;

DYNAMICS; INNOVATION; OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; SALES; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING; WORK SIMPLIFICATION;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 77954125321     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: 10991638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.1065     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Brombacher AC, Sander PC, Sonnemans PJM, Rouvroye JL. Managing product reliability in business processes 'under pressure'. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2005;88:137-146.
2. Harry M, Schroeder R. Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing the World's Top Corporations. Doubleday: New York, 2000.
3. Montgomery DC. Beyond Six Sigma. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2001;17(4):iii-iv.
4. Goh TN. A strategic assessment of Six Sigma. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2002;18:403-410.
5. Magnusson K, Kroslid D, Bergman B. Six Sigma: The Pragmatic Approach. Studentlitteratur: Lund, Sweden, 2003.
6. Brady JE, Allen TT. Six Sigma literature: A review and agenda for future research. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2006;22:335-367.
7. Schroeder RG, Linderman K, Liedtke C, Choo AS. Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory. Journal of Operations Management 2008;26:536-554.
8. Hahn GJ, Doganaksoy N, Hoerl R. The evolution of Six Sigma. Quality Engineering 2000;12(3):317-326.
9. Fuller HT. Observations about the success and evolution of Six Sigma at Seagate. Quality Engineering 2000;12(3):311-315.
10. Folaron J, Morgan JP. The evolution of Six Sigma. ASQ Six Sigma Forum Magazine 2003;2(4):38-44.
11. Hoerl R, Snee RD, Czarniak S, Parr WC. The future of Six Sigma. ASQ Six Sigma Forum Magazine 2004;3(4):38-43.
12. De Mast J. Integrating the many facets of Six Sigma. Quality Engineering 2007;19(4):353-361.
13. Banuelas R, Antony J. Six Sigma or design for Six Sigma. The TQM Magazine 2004;16(4):250-263.
14. Kwak YH, Anbari FT. Benefits, obstacles, and future of Six Sigma approach. Technovation 2006;26:708-715.
15. Bergman B, Klefsjö B. Quality from Customer Needs to Customer Satisfaction. Studentlitteratur: Lund, Sweden, 2003.
16. Xie M, Tan KC, Goh TN. Advanced QFD Applications. ASQ Quality Press: Milwaukee, WI, 2003.
17. Raharjo H, Brombacher AC, Xie M. Dealing with subjectivity in early product design phase: A systematic approach to exploit QFD potentials. Computers and Industrial Engineering 2008;55(1):253-278.
18. Cristiano JJ, Liker JK, White CC III. Key factors in the successful application of quality function deployment (QFD). IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2001;48(1):81-95.
19. Kano N, Seraku N, Takahashi F, Tsuji S. Attractive quality and must-be quality. The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control 1984;14(2):39-48.
20. Matzler K, Hinterhuber HH. How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation 1998;18(1):25-38.
21. Shen XX, Tan KC, Xie M. An integrated approach to innovative product development using Kano's model and QFD. European Journal of Innovation Management 2000;3(2):91-99.
22. Tan KC, Shen XX. Integrating Kano's model in the planning matrix of quality function deployment. Total Quality Management 2000;11(8):1141-1151.
23. Tan KC, Pawitra TA. Integrating SERVQUAL and Kano's model into QFD for service excellence development. Managing Service Quality 2001;11(6):418-430.
24. Sireli Y, Kauffmann P, Ozan E. Integration of Kano's model into QFD for multiple product design. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2007;54(2):380-390.
25. Lai X, Tan KC, Xie M. Optimizing product design using quantitative quality function deployment: A case study. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2007;23(1):45-57.
26. Tontini G. Integrating the Kano model and QFD for designing new products. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 2007;18(6):599-612.
27. Kano N. Life cycle and creation of attractive quality. The Fourth International Quality Management and Organizational Development (QMOD) Conference, Linköping University, Sweden, 2001.
28. Wu HH, Liao AYH, Wang PC. Using grey theory in quality function deployment to analyse dynamic customer requirements. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2005;25:1241-1247.
29. Wu HH, Shieh JI. Using a Markov chain model in quality function deployment to analyze customer requirements. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2006;30:141-146.
30. Raharjo H, Xie M, Brombacher AC. Prioritizing quality characteristics in dynamic quality function deployment. International Journal of Production Research 2006;44(23):5005-5018.
31. Van de Poel I. Methodological problems in QFD and directions for future development. Research in Engineering Design 2007;18(1):21-36.
32. CQM. A special issue on Kano's methods for understanding customer-defined quality. The Center for Quality Management Journal 1993;2(4):3-35.
33. Witell LN, Fundin A. Dynamics of service attributes: A test of Kano's theory of attractive quality. International Journal of Service Industry Management 2005;16(2):152-168.
34. Löfgren M, Witell L. Two decades of using Kano's theory of attractive quality: A literature review. The Quality Management Journal 2008;15(1):59-75.
35. Shen XX, Xie M, Tan KC. Listening to the future voice of the customer using fuzzy trend analysis in QFD. Quality Engineering 2001;13(3):419-425.
36. Fong D. Using the self-stated importance questionnaire to interpret Kano questionnaire results. Center for Quality of Management Journal 1996;5(3):21-23.
37. Raharjo H, Xie M, Brombacher AC. On modeling dynamic priorities in the analytic hierarchy process using compositional data analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 2009;194(3):834-846.
38. Hanke JE, Wichern DW. Business Forecasting (8th edn). Pearson Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2005.
39. Harker PT, Vargas LG. The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's analytic hierarchy process. Management Science 1987;33(9):1383-1402.
40. Aitchison J. The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data. Blackburn Press: Caldwell, NJ, 2003.
41. Chan LK, Wu ML. Quality function deployment: A comprehensive review on its concepts and methods. Quality Engineering 2002;15(1):23-35.
42. Saaty TL. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1980.
43. Malik SA, Sullivan WG. Impact of ABC information on product mix and costing decisions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 1995;42(2):171-176.
44. Pollack-Johnson B, Liberatore MJ. Incorporating quality considerations into project time/cost tradeoff analysis and decision making. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2006;53(4):534-542.
45. Kreng VB, Lee TP. QFD-based modular product design with linear integer programming-A case study. Journal of Engineering Design 2004;15(3):261-284.
46. Takai S. The role of modularized QFD in an interdisciplinary approach for system concept selection. Proceedings of ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Philadelphia, PA, U. S. A., 10-13 September 2006.
47. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations (5th edn). Free Press: New York, 2003.
48. Arvidsson M, Gremyr I. Principles of robust design methodology. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2008;24:23-35.
49. Hasenkamp T, Arvidsson M, Gremyr I. A review of practices for robust design methodology. Journal of Engineering Design 2008; DOI: 10.1080/09544820802275557.
50. Tang LC, Goh TN, Yam HS, Yoap T. Six Sigma: Advanced Tools for Black Belts and Master Black Belts. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2006.
51. Tang LC, Goh TN, Lam SW, Zhang CW. Fortification of Six Sigma: Expanding the DMAIC toolset. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2007;23:3-18.