The role of modularized QFD in an interdisciplinary approach for system concept selection

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Takai, Shun ^a  

^a MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Concept selection; Decomposition; Modularization; Perceptual rating; QFD; Systems

Indexed keywords

COST ACCOUNTING; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; DECOMPOSITION; ENGINEERS; MARKETING; MATRIX ALGEBRA; VALUE ENGINEERING;

MODULARIZATION; PERCEPTUAL RATING; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT (QFD); SYSTEM CONCEPT SELECTION;

SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EID: 33751308830     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/detc2006-99627     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. King, R., 1987, Better Design in Half the Time: Implementing Quality Function Deployment (QFD) in America, GOAL, Lawrence, MA.
2. Hauser, J., and Clausing, D., 1988, "The House of Quality," Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp. 63-73.
3. Akao, Y., 1990, Quality Function Deployment: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Clausing, D., 1993, Total Quality Development: A Step-By-Step Guide to World-Class Concurrent Engineering, ASME Press, New York, NY.
5. Franceschini, F., 2002, Advanced Quality Function Deployment, St. Lucie Press, Boca Raton, FL.
6. Griffin, A., and Hauser, J. R., 1992, "Pattern of Communication among Marketing, Engineering and Manufacturing-A Comparisons between Two New Product Teams," Management Science, 38(3), pp. 360-373.
7. Hazelrigg, G A., 1996, "The Implication of Arrow's Impossibility Theorem on Approaches to Optimal Engineering Design," ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 118(2), pp. 161-164.
8. Scott, M. J., and Antonsson, E. K., 1999, "Arrow's Theorem and Engineering Design Decision Making," Research in Engineering Design, 11, pp. 218-228.
9. Wasserman, G. S., 1993, "On How to Prioritize Design Requirements During the QFD Planning Process," IIE Transactions, 25(3), pp. 59-65.
10. Franceschini, F., and Rossetto, S., 1995, "QFD: The Problem of Comparing Technical/Engineering Design Requirements," Research in Engineering Design, 7, pp. 270-278.
11. Otto, K. N., 1995, "Measure Methods for Product Evaluation," Research in Engineering Design, 1, pp. 86-101.
12. Locascio, A., and Thurston, D. L., 1994, "Quantifying the House of Quality for Optimal Product Design," ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference Proceedings, DE-Vol. 68, pp. 43-54.
13. Goncalves-Coelho, A. M., Mourao, A. J. F., and Pereira, Z. L., 2005, "Improving the use of QFD with Axiomatic Design," Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 13(3), pp. 233-239.
14. El-Haik, B. S., 2005, Axiomatic Quality : Integrating Axiomatic Design with Six-Sigma, Reliability, and Quality Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
15. Maekawa, Y., and Ohta, K., 1990, "Quality Deployment and Cost Deployment," in Y. Akao, eds., Quality Function Deployment: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 211-235.
16. Calder, B., 1977, "Focus Groups and the Nature of Qualitative Marketing Research," Journal of Marketing Research, 14, August, pp. 353-364.
17. Griffin, A., and Hauser, J. R., 1993, "The Voice of the Customer," Marketing Science, 12(1), pp. 1-27.
18. Green, P. E., Carmone, F. J., and Fox, L. B., 1969, "Television Programme Similarities: An Application of Subjective Clustering," Journal of the Market Research Society, 11(1), pp. 70-90.
19. Green, P., and McNennamin, J., 1973, "Market Position Analysis," in Stewart Henderson Britt and Norma F. Guess (Eds.), Marketing Manager's Handbook, Chicago, IL: Dartnell Press; pp. 543-554.
20. Pahl, G., and Beitz, W., 1996, Engineering Design: A systematic approach, Springer.
21. Otto, K., and Wood, K., 2001, Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
22. Shah, J., 1998, "Experimental Investigation of Progressive Idea Generation Techniques in Engineering Design," CD-ROM Proceedings of DETC '98, 1998 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Atlanta, GA.
23. Green, P. E., and Wind, Y., 1975, "New Way to Measure Consumers' Judgements," Harvard Business Review, 53, pp. 107-117.
24. Green, P. E., and Srinivasan, V., 1978, "Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook," Journal of Consumer Research, 5, pp. 103-123.
25. Green, P. E., and Srinivasan, V., 1990, "Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice," Journal of Marketing, 54(October), pp. 3-19.
26. Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H., 1976, Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
27. Howard, R. A., 1983, "The Evolution of Decision Analysis," Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis, Vol. 1, Howard, R. A., and Matheson, J. E., eds., Strategic Decision Group Menlo Park, CA., pp. 7-16.
28. Howard, R. A., 1988b, "Decision Analysis: Practice and Promise," Management Science, 34(6), pp. 679-695.
29. Cooper, R., and Chew, B. W., 1996, "Control Tomorrow's Costs Through Today's Design," Harvard Business Review, January-February, pp. 88-97.
30. Cooper, R., 1995, When Lean Enterprises Collide: Competing Through Confrontation, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
31. Ansari, S. L., Bell, J. E., Cypher, J. H., Dears, P. H., Dutton, J. J., Ferguson, M. D., Hallin, K., Marx, C. A., Ross, C. G., Zampino, P. A., 1997, Target Costing: The Next Frontier in Strategic Cost Management, The CAM-I Target Cost Core Group, Irwin Professional Publishing, Chicago, IL.
32. Pugh, S., 1990, Total Design, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
33. Kepner, C. H., and Tregoe, B. B., 1997, The New Rational Manager, Princeton Research Press, Princeton, N.J.
34. Ulrich, K. T. and Eppinger, S. D., 1995, Product Design and Development, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY.
35. Fechner, G., 1966, Element of Psychophysics, Vol. 2, translated by Helmut E. Adler, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, NY.
36. Saaty, T. L., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw Hill, New York.
37. Fowler, T. C., 1990, Value Analysis in Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.
38. Kusiak, A., and Larson, N., 1995, "Decomposition and Representation Methods in Mechanical Design," ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 117(B), pp. 17-24.
39. Kusiak, A., and Szczerbicki, E., 1992, "A Formal Approach to Specifications in Conceptual Design," ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 114, pp. 659-666.
40. Baldwin, C. Y., and Clark, K. B., 2000, Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
41. Ward, A. C., Liker, J. K., Sobek, II, D. K., and Cristiano, J. J., 1994, "Set-Based Concurrent Engineering and Toyota," Proceedings, ASME Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, pp. 79-90.
42. Boothroyd, G., Dewhurst, P., and Knight, W., 2002, Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly, Marcel Dekker, New York.