Determination of glomerular filtration rate using dynamic CT-Angiography: Simultaneous acquisition of morphological and functional information

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 45, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 387-392

  Helck, Andreas ^a   Sommer, Wieland H ^a   Klotz, Ernst ^b   Wessely, Matthias ^a   Nikolaou, Konstantin ^a   Clevert, Dirk A ^a   Notohamiprodjo, Mike ^a   Illner, Wolf D ^a   Reiser, Maximilian ^a   Becker, Hans Christoph ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

contrast medium reduction; dynamic CTA; quantitative imaging; renal transplant; single kidney GFR

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; CREATININE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CREATININE CLEARANCE; FEMALE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENAL GRAFT DYSFUNCTION; ALGORITHM; ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE QUALITY; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RENAL ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954083771     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181e332d0     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Katzberg RW, Buonocore MH, Low R, et al. MR determination of glomerular filtration rate in subjects with solitary kidneys in comparison to clinical standards of renal function: feasibility and preliminary report. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2009;4:51-65.
2. Sourbron SP, Michaely HJ, Reiser MF, et al. MRI-measurement of perfusion and glomerular filtration in the human kidney with a separable compartment model. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:40-48.
3. Grenier N, Mendichovszky I, de Senneville BD, et al. Measurement of glomerular filtration rate with magnetic resonance imaging: principles, limitations, and expectations. Semin Nucl Med. 2008;38:47-55.
4. Ruppert-Kohlmayr AJ, Uggowitzer MM. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) of the kidneys [in German]. Radiologe. 2005;45:887-896.
5. Sommer FG. Can single-kidney glomerular filtration rate be determined with contrast-enhanced CT? Radiology. 2007;242:325-326.
6. Fowler JC, Beadsmoore C, Gaskarth MT, et al. A simple processing method allowing comparison of renal enhancing volumes derived from standard portal venous phase contrast-enhanced multidetector CT images to derive a CT estimate of differential renal function with equivalent results to nuclear medicine quantification. Br J Radiol. 2006;79:935-942.
7. Tsushima Y. Functional CT of the kidney. Eur J Radiol. 1999;30:191-197.
8. Miles KA. Measurement of tissue perfusion by dynamic computed tomography. Br J Radiol. 1991;64:409-412.
9. Blomley MJ, Dawson P. Review article: the quantification of renal function with enhanced computed tomography. Br J Radiol. 1996;69:989-995.
10. Lerman LO, Flickinger AL, Sheedy PF, et al. Reproducibility of human kidney perfusion and volume determinations with electron beam computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 1996;31:204-210.
11. Miles KA, Hayball MP, Dixon AK. Functional imaging of changes in human intrarenal perfusion using quantitative dynamic computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 1994;29:911-914.
12. Krier JD, Ritman EL, Bajzer Z, et al. Noninvasive measurement of concurrent single-kidney perfusion, glomerular filtration, and tubular function. Am J Physiol. 2001;281:F630-F638.
13. Daghini E, Juillard L, Haas JA, et al. Comparison of mathematic models for assessment of glomerular filtration rate with electron-beam CT in pigs. Radiology. 2007;242:417-424.
14. Dawson P, Peters M. Dynamic contrast bolus computed tomography for the assessment of renal function. Invest Radiol. 1993;28:1039-1042. (Pubitemid 24085696)
15. Miles KA, Leggett DA, Bennett GA. CT derived Patlak images of the human kidney. Br J Radiol. 1999;72:153-158.
16. Tsushima Y, Blomley MJ, Kusano S, et al. Use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography to measure clearance per unit renal volume: a novel measurement of renal function and fractional vascular volume. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;33:754-760.
17. Tsushima Y, Blomley MJ, Okabe K, et al. Determination of glomerular filtration rate per unit renal volume using computerized tomography: correlation with conventional measures of total and divided renal function. J Urol. 2001;165:382-385.
18. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:223-232.
19. Frennby B, Almen T. Use of spiral CT and the contrast medium iohexol to determine in one session aortorenal morphology and the relative glomerular filtration rate of each kidney. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:2270-2277.
20. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, et al; Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130:461-470.
21. Du Bois D, Du Bois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916. Nutrition. 1989;5:303-311.
22. Raju DL, Grover VK, Shoker A. Limitations of glomerular filtration rate equations in the renal transplant patient. Clin Transplant. 2005;19:259-268.
23. Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, et al. European Guidelines on Quality Criteria Computed Tomography: Appendix C. Funded by the European Commission; 2009. Contract No FIGM-CT2000-20078-CT-TIP. http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/ quality/.
24. Peters AM. The kinetic basis of glomerular filtration rate measurement and new concepts of indexation to body size. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:137-149.
25. Hackstein N, Kooijman H, Tomaselli S, et al. Glomerular filtration rate measured using the Patlak plot technique and contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI with different amounts of gadolinium-DTPA. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;22:406-414.
26. Hackstein N, Heckrodt J, Rau WS. Measurement of single-kidney glomerular filtration rate using a contrast-enhanced dynamic gradient-echo sequence and the Rutland-Patlak plot technique. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;18:714-725. (Pubitemid 37467273)
27. Laurent D, Poirier K, Wasvary J, et al. Effect of essential hypertension on kidney function as measured in rat by dynamic MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2002.47.127-134.
28. Lee VS, Rusinek H, Noz ME, et al. Dynamic three-dimensional MR renography for the measurement of single kidney function: initial experience. Radiology. 2003;227:289-294.
29. Sadick M, Schock D, Kraenzlin B, et al. Morphologic and dynamic renal imaging with assessment of glomerular filtration rate in a pcy-mouse model using a clinical 3.0 Tesla scanner. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:469-475.
30. Ludemann L, Nafz B, Elsner F, et al. Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:125-134.
31. Rossi C, Boss A, Artunc F, et al. Comprehensive assessment of renal function and vessel morphology in potential living kidney donors: an MRI-based approach. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:705-711.
32. Samtleben W. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis [in German]. Radiologe. 2007; 47:778-784.
33. Hackstein N, Bauer J, Hauck EW, et al. Measuring single-kidney glomerular filtration rate on single-detector helical CT using a two-point Patlak plot technique in patients with increased interstitial space. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:147-156.
34. Krishnamurthi G, Stantz KM, Steinmetz R, et al. Functional imaging in small animals using X-ray computed tomography-study of physiologic measurement reproducibility. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005;24:832-843.
35. O'Dell-Anderson KJ, Twardock R, Grimm JB, et al. Determination of glomerular filtration rate in dogs using contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2006;47:127-135.
36. Daghini E, Primak AN, Chade AR, et al. Assessment of renal hemodynamics and function in pigs with 64-section multidetector CT: comparison with electron-beam CT. Radiology. 2007;243:405-412.
37. Buckley DL, Shurrab AE, Cheung CM, et al. Measurement of single kidney function using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison of two models in human subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24:1117-1123.
38. Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Erley CM, et al. The ACTIVE trial: comparison of the effects on renal function of iomeprol-400 and iodixanol-320 in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing abdominal computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:170-178.
39. ten Dam MA, Wetzels JF. Toxicity of contrast media: an update. Neth J Med. 2008;66:416-422.
40. Rydahl C, Thomsen HS, Marckmann P. High prevalence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in chronic renal failure patients exposed to gadodiamide, a gadolinium-containing magnetic resonance contrast agent. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:141-144.
41. Hope TA, Herfkens RJ, Denianke KS, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with chronic kidney disease who received gadopentetate dimeglu-mine. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:135-139.
42. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, et al. National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol. 2006;79:968-980.
43. Perrone RD, Madias NE, Levey AS. Serum creatinine as an index of renal function: new insights into old concepts. Clin Chem. 1992;38:1933-1953.