Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 125-134

  Ludiedemann, Lutz ^a   Nafz, Benno ^a   Eisner, Franz ^b   Groszlige Siestrup, Christian ^a   Meissler, Michael ^a   Kaufels, Nicola ^c   Rehbein, Hagen ^a   Persson, Pontus B ^a   Michaely, Henrik J ^d   Lengsfeld, Philipp ^e   Voth, Matthias ^e   Gutberlet, Matthias ^e  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b VIVANTES KLINIKUM AM URBAN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^d BAYER PHARMA AG   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Blood pool contrast agent; DCE MRI; Kidney; Perfusion; Renal blood flow

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN; GADOFOSVESET;

ABDOMINAL AORTA; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLOOD; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; KIDNEY BLOOD FLOW; KIDNEY CORTEX; KIDNEY MEDULLA; KIDNEY PERFUSION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENAL ARTERY; SWINE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 67651091583     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318193598c     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Rusinek H, Kaur M, Lee VS. Renal magnetic resonance imaging. Cürr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2004;3:667-673.
2. Schoenberg SO, Rieger J, Nittka M, et al. Renal MR angiography: current debates and developments in imaging of renal artery stenosis. Semin Ultrasound CTMR. 2003;24:255-267.
3. Kramer U, Thiel C, Seeger A, etal. Preoperative evaluation of potential living related kidney donors with high-spatial-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) angiography at 3 Tesla: comparison with intraoperative findings. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:747-755.
4. Lee VS, Rusinek H, Noz ME, et al. Dynamic three-dimensional MR renog-raphy for the measurement of single kidney function: initial experience. Radiology. 2003;227:289-294.
5. Sourbron SP, Michaely HJ, Reiser MF, et al. MRI-Measurement of perfusion and glomerular filtration in the human kidney with a separable compartment model. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:40-48.
6. Semelka RC, Corrigan K, Ascher SM, et al. Renal corticomedullary differentiation: observation in patients with differing serum creatinine levels. Radiology. 1994;190:149-152.
7. Michaely HJ, Schoenberg SO, Oesingmann N, et al. Renal artery stenosis: functional assessment with dynamic MR perfusion measurements-feasibility study. Radiology. 2006;238:586-596.
8. Lee VS, Rusinek H, Johnson G, et al. MR renography with low-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine: feasibility. Radiology. 2001;221:371-379.
9. Carvlin MJ, Arger PH, Kundel HL, et al. Use of Gd-DTPA and fast gradient-echo and spin-echo MR imaging to demonstrate renal function in the rabbit. Radiology. 1989;170:705-711.
10. Prasad PV, Edelman RR, Epstein FH. Noninvasive evaluation of intrarenal oxygenation with BOLD MRI. Circülation. 1996;94:3271-3275.
11. Martirosian P, Klose U, MaderI, etal. FAIR true-FISP perfusion imaging of the kidneys. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51:353-361.
12. Michaely HJ, Schoenberg SO, Ittrich C, et al. Renal Disease: Value of functional magnetic resonance imaging with flow and perfusion measurements. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:698-705.
13. Aumann S, Schoenberg SO, Just A, et al. Quantification of renal perfusion using an intravascular contrast agent (part 1): results in a canine model. Magn Reson Med. 2003;49:276-287.
14. Gadofosveset: MS 325, MS 32520, Vasovist, ZK 236018. Drugs R D. 2004;5:339-342.
15. Prasad PV, Cannillo J, Chavez DR, et al. First-pass renal perfusion imaging using MS-325, an albumin-targeted MRI contrast agent. Invest Radiol. 1999; 34:566-571.
16. Li W, Brophy DP, Chen Q, et al. Semiquantitative assessment of uterine perfusion using first pass dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for patients treated with uterine fibroid embolization. JMagn Reson Imaging. 2000;12: 1004-1008.
17. Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, et al. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36: 715-725.
18. Lerman LO, Schwartz S, Grande JP, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of a novel swine model of renal artery stenosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:1455-1465.
19. Michaely HJ, Sourbron SP, Buettner C, et al. Temporal constraints in renal perfusion imaging with a 2-compartment model. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:120- 128.
20. 15O positron emission tomography. Eür J Radiol. In press. Caravan P, Parigi G, Chasse JM, et al. Albumin binding, relaxivity, and water exchange kinetics of the diastereoisomers of MS-325, a Gadolinium (III)-based magnetic resonance angiography contrast agent. Inorg Chem. 2007;46:6632-6639.
21. Warmuth C, Nagel S, Hegemann O, et al. Accuracy of blood flow values determined by arterial spin labeling: a validation study in isolated porcine kidneys. JMagn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:353-358.
22. 15O. JNücl Med. 2002;43:470-475.
23. Nitzsche EA, Choi Y, Killion D, et al. Quantification and parametric mapping of cortical blood flow in vivo based on Patlak graphical analysis. Kidney Int. 1993;44:985-996.
24. 15O PET to assess perfusion of pelvic tumors: arterial blood sampling versus image extraction. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51: 2883-2900.